Is pulmonary embolism (PE) often a result of recurring COVID-19 infections in patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Is Pulmonary Embolism Often a Result of Recurring COVID-19 Infections?

Pulmonary embolism is associated with acute COVID-19 infection, not recurring infections—the evidence addresses PE during active COVID-19 illness, with no data supporting PE as a consequence of multiple separate COVID-19 episodes. 1

PE Incidence During Acute COVID-19 Infection

The available evidence focuses exclusively on PE occurring during active COVID-19 hospitalization, not from recurring infections:

  • PE occurs in approximately 25% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients who undergo imaging for suspected thromboembolism, with similar rates in ICU (29%) and non-ICU (24%) settings 2
  • The incidence of VTE in COVID-19 patients is higher than in non-COVID hospitalized patients with similar degrees of illness, even with prophylactic anticoagulation 1
  • PE develops at a median of 7.0 days after hospital admission during the acute infection phase 3

Pathophysiology: Why COVID-19 Causes PE During Acute Infection

COVID-19 creates a perfect thrombotic storm through all three components of Virchow's triad during active infection 1:

  • Hypercoagulable state: Systemic cytokine storm (elevated IL-2, IL-7, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A, TNF-α) triggers the coagulation system 1
  • Endothelial injury: Significantly elevated von Willebrand factor and Factor VIII levels indicate direct vascular damage 1
  • Stasis: Severe ARDS requiring positive-pressure ventilation with high PEEP and fluid restriction decreases pulmonary blood flow, leading to microthrombosis 1

Critical Evidence Gap: No Data on Recurring Infections

None of the available guidelines or research studies address PE risk from multiple separate COVID-19 infections [1 through 4]. The evidence exclusively examines:

  • PE during a single acute COVID-19 hospitalization 1, 2
  • Recurrent VTE during the same COVID-19 illness despite anticoagulation (not recurrent COVID infections) 1
  • Post-discharge thromboprophylaxis following a single COVID-19 episode 1

Management of Recurrent VTE During Acute COVID-19 (Not Recurring Infections)

If PE recurs during the same COVID-19 illness despite therapeutic anticoagulation 1:

  • With LMWH failure: Increase LMWH dose by 25-30% after confirming compliance 1
  • With DOAC or warfarin failure: Switch to therapeutic weight-adjusted LMWH after confirming compliance and therapeutic range 1
  • Minimum anticoagulation duration is 3 months for any COVID-19-associated PE 1

Clinical Pitfalls

  • Do not confuse "recurrent VTE during COVID-19" with "PE from recurring COVID-19 infections"—the guidelines address breakthrough thrombosis during a single illness, not thrombotic risk from multiple separate infections 1
  • D-dimer levels >1600 ng/mL (8.761 nmol/L) predict PE with 100% sensitivity during acute COVID-19 and should prompt CT pulmonary angiography 2
  • Hemorrhagic events occur later than thrombotic events (median 11.4 days vs 7.0 days after admission), requiring careful temporal risk-benefit assessment 3
  • Male sex, smoking, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, and IL-6 levels are associated with increased PE risk during acute COVID-19 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Bleeding Risk in COVID-19 Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.