Blood Testing Before Stopping Venetoclax in AML
Before discontinuing venetoclax therapy in AML, order a bone marrow aspirate with blast count assessment, multiparameter flow cytometry for measurable residual disease (MRD), and molecular testing for mutations (particularly NPM1, IDH1/2, FLT3, and TP53) to determine disease status. 1
Essential Testing Components
Bone Marrow Assessment
- Bone marrow aspirate is mandatory to evaluate blast percentage and determine if morphologic remission (<5% blasts) has been achieved 1
- Count at least 500 nucleated cells on marrow smears containing spicules for accurate blast enumeration 1
- Include myeloblasts, monoblasts, and promonocytes in the blast count 1
- If aspirate is inadequate (dry tap), perform a bone marrow trephine biopsy with immunohistochemistry for CD34 to assess blast burden 1
Flow Cytometry for MRD
- Multiparameter flow cytometry (minimum 3-4 colors) should be performed to detect MRD using the aberrant immunophenotype established at diagnosis 1
- Flow cytometric MRD assessment from bone marrow is recommended after treatment cycles and can detect residual disease below morphologic thresholds 1
- The absence of MRD (particularly in patients achieving complete remission) correlates with better outcomes 1
Molecular Testing
- Molecular MRD assessment should be performed if a molecular marker (NPM1, IDH1/2, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, or other fusion transcripts) was present at diagnosis 1
- Molecular testing can be performed from both peripheral blood and bone marrow 1
- Repeat mutation analysis for key genes including NPM1, FLT3, IDH1/2, TP53, KRAS/NRAS, and SF3B1, as acquisition of new mutations or changes in mutational burden can indicate emerging resistance 2
Timing of Assessment
- Perform bone marrow biopsy on days 21-28 of each venetoclax cycle for response assessment, potentially earlier (day 21) for patients receiving venetoclax with decitabine 1
- If morphologic remission is achieved and counts recover, subsequent bone marrow biopsies can be repeated at 3-6 month intervals rather than after every cycle 1
- If blood counts worsen over time despite prior remission, repeat bone marrow biopsy immediately to rule out relapsed disease before stopping therapy 1
Additional Laboratory Monitoring
- Complete blood count with differential to assess peripheral blast count and cytopenias 1
- Comprehensive metabolic panel to evaluate organ function 1
- Cytogenetic analysis if new chromosomal abnormalities are suspected, as relapse may be driven by increased cytogenetic complexity 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on peripheral blood counts to determine disease status, as bone marrow assessment is essential even when peripheral counts appear normal 1
- Do not use flow cytometric CD34 counts as a substitute for visual blast assessment, as not all blasts express CD34 and processing artifacts can cause errors 1
- Do not stop venetoclax based on cytopenias alone without confirming disease status, as prolonged cytopenias can occur even in morphologic remission with venetoclax-based therapy 1
- If considering stopping therapy due to worsening counts, always rule out relapsed disease with bone marrow biopsy before attributing cytopenias to drug toxicity 1
Predictors of Response and Resistance
- NPM1 mutations predict better responses to venetoclax therapy and should be monitored 3, 2
- TP53, KRAS/NRAS, FLT3-ITD, and SF3B1 mutations are associated with worse outcomes and venetoclax resistance 3, 2
- Adverse cytogenetics predict inferior survival with venetoclax-based therapy 2
- Monocytic phenotype AML shows decreased sensitivity to venetoclax 3