What is the prognosis for a 64‑year‑old man with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia 20 months after allogeneic stem‑cell transplantation, now on azacitidine (Vidaza) and venetoclax, who received liposomal daunorubicin (Mylotarg), and has CBFB‑MYH11 inversion, derivative chromosome 1;18, trisomy 8, low donor chimerism in myeloid and CD34⁺ cells, and NRAS G12D and WT1 splice‑site mutations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prognosis for Recurrent AML Post-Transplant with High-Risk Features

This patient faces a grave prognosis with an expected median overall survival of 6-9 months, driven by multiple adverse factors: early post-transplant relapse (20 months), emergence of the derivative chromosome 1;18 abnormality (associated with poor prognosis), near-complete loss of donor chimerism in CD34+ progenitor cells (0% donor DNA), and persistent disease despite venetoclax-azacitidine therapy. 1

Critical Prognostic Factors

Timing of Post-Transplant Relapse

  • Relapse at 20 months (approximately 671 days) post-transplant places this patient in the intermediate-risk category for post-transplant relapse, with 3-year survival probability of only 12-26%. 2, 3
  • Patients relapsing 6-24 months after allogeneic transplant have significantly worse outcomes compared to those relapsing beyond 2 years (38% 3-year survival for >3 years vs. 12% for 6-24 months). 2

Cytogenetic Evolution and High-Risk Features

  • The emergence of the derivative chromosome 1;18 represents clonal evolution with gain of 1q and loss of 18p—a new abnormality explicitly associated with poor prognosis in the cytogenetic report. 1
  • While the original CBFB rearrangement (inv(16)) is typically favorable-risk, the persistence of this abnormality with additional high-risk features (der(1;18), trisomy 8) transforms the disease biology into an adverse-risk category. 2
  • The presence of two distinct clones indicates genetic heterogeneity and treatment resistance. 1

Chimerism Analysis: Critical Red Flag

  • Complete loss of donor chimerism in CD34+ progenitor cells (0% donor DNA) indicates that the leukemia has entirely replaced the donor graft in the stem cell compartment—this is the most ominous finding. 1
  • Myeloid lineage chimerism of only 31% donor DNA demonstrates predominant recipient (leukemic) cells in the myeloid compartment. 1
  • This pattern indicates graft failure at the stem cell level and loss of graft-versus-leukemia effect. 2

Molecular Mutations

  • NRAS G12D mutation (34.7% allele frequency) and WT1 splice-site mutation (25.8% allele frequency) represent additional adverse molecular features associated with treatment resistance. 1
  • RAS pathway mutations are associated with resistance to venetoclax-based therapy. 1

Post-Treatment Bone Marrow Findings

  • Persistent cytogenetic abnormalities (extra chromosome 1 and derivative 1;18) after chemotherapy indicate chemoresistant disease. 1
  • The appearance of a non-clonal deletion 13(q12q22) suggests ongoing genomic instability. 1

Treatment Response and Expected Outcomes

Current Regimen Efficacy

  • Venetoclax-azacitidine in the relapsed/refractory post-transplant setting achieves overall response rates of only 21-43%, with complete remission rates of 24-31%. 2, 1
  • The median overall survival for relapsed/refractory AML treated with azacitidine or decitabine is 6.7 months, with CR/CRi rates of 16.3%. 2
  • Given the persistent disease after venetoclax-azacitidine therapy (as evidenced by persistent cytogenetic abnormalities), this patient appears to have primary refractory disease to this regimen. 1

Age and Performance Status Considerations

  • At 64 years old, this patient falls into the higher-risk age category (>45 years at relapse), which independently predicts worse outcomes with a relative risk of 1.42 for mortality. 3
  • Intensive salvage chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine cannot be safely applied in patients aged 60 years or older due to unacceptably high toxicity risk. 2

Realistic Treatment Options and Their Limitations

Second Allogeneic Transplant

  • A second allogeneic transplant represents the only realistic chance for long-term survival but carries substantial risk and requires achieving remission first. 2, 1
  • Second transplant is only considered for patients relapsing >5 months after first transplant (this patient qualifies at 20 months). 2, 4
  • However, the complete loss of donor chimerism in CD34+ cells (0%) and persistent disease after current therapy make achieving the remission necessary for second transplant highly unlikely. 1
  • Patients with active/persistent disease who undergo second transplant have dismal outcomes and should ideally be enrolled in clinical trials. 5

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI)

  • DLI combined with chemotherapy or targeted agents is rarely effective in the long term for post-transplant relapse, particularly with low disease burden and longer time since first transplant. 4, 6
  • The complete loss of donor chimerism in stem cells suggests DLI alone would be ineffective, as there is no residual graft-versus-leukemia effect to augment. 1
  • Venetoclax-azacitidine combined with DLI achieved 61.5% overall response rate in one study, but this patient is already on venetoclax-azacitidine with persistent disease. 6

Clinical Trial Enrollment

  • Clinical trial enrollment should be the highest priority given the poor prognosis and limited standard options. 1, 4
  • Novel triplet combinations (e.g., adding pevonedistat to venetoclax-azacitidine) showed 46.7% overall response rate in relapsed/refractory AML, with 71.4% CR rate in HMA-naive patients. 7
  • However, this patient has already received azacitidine, which may limit efficacy of HMA-based combinations. 7

Targeted Therapy Considerations

  • The patient lacks FLT3, IDH1, or IDH2 mutations that would make them eligible for targeted monotherapy with gilteritinib, ivosidenib, or enasidenib. 2, 1
  • NRAS mutations do not currently have approved targeted therapies. 1

Quantitative Survival Estimates

Short-Term Survival (1 Year)

  • Based on the relapse timing (6-24 months post-transplant), expected 1-year survival is approximately 12-23%. 2, 3
  • The presence of persistent disease after venetoclax-azacitidine likely places survival at the lower end of this range. 1

Long-Term Survival (3-5 Years)

  • 3-year survival probability is 12% for patients relapsing 6-24 months post-transplant. 2
  • 5-year survival is realistically <5% without achieving complete remission and proceeding to second transplant or achieving durable response to novel therapy. 2, 1

Median Overall Survival

  • Median overall survival is expected to be 6-9 months from current assessment. 1
  • This estimate assumes continuation of venetoclax-azacitidine or transition to best supportive care. 1

Critical Caveats and Clinical Pitfalls

Avoid Intensive Chemotherapy

  • Do not pursue intensive salvage chemotherapy (high-dose cytarabine-based regimens) in this 64-year-old patient due to prohibitive toxicity risk and low likelihood of benefit. 2
  • 30-day mortality with intensive salvage chemotherapy in heavily pretreated patients can reach 14% or higher. 4

Realistic Goal-Setting

  • Treatment goals must shift from cure to disease control and quality of life optimization. 1
  • Long-term survival without additional transplant is unlikely, and achieving remission adequate for second transplant appears improbable given current disease trajectory. 1

Palliative Care Integration

  • Early palliative care consultation should be initiated to address symptom management, transfusion support, and goals of care discussions. 2, 4
  • Best supportive care with cytoreductive therapy (hydroxyurea, 6-mercaptopurine) should be offered if the patient cannot tolerate or declines active treatment. 2

Monitoring for Complications

  • Close monitoring for infectious complications, bleeding (given thrombocytopenia), and tumor lysis syndrome is essential. 8
  • The patient's low donor chimerism and immunosuppression place them at high risk for opportunistic infections. 1

Summary of Prognostic Determinants

This patient's prognosis is determined by the convergence of multiple adverse factors:

  • Early post-transplant relapse (20 months = intermediate-risk timing) 2
  • Complete loss of donor chimerism in CD34+ cells (0% donor DNA) 1
  • Emergence of high-risk cytogenetic abnormality (der(1;18)) 1
  • Persistent disease despite venetoclax-azacitidine therapy 1
  • Adverse molecular mutations (NRAS G12D, WT1 splice-site) 1
  • Age >60 years precluding intensive salvage chemotherapy 2
  • Clonal evolution with multiple cytogenetic clones 1

The median overall survival of 6-9 months represents the most realistic expectation, with clinical trial enrollment or novel combination therapy offering the only meaningful chance to extend survival beyond this timeframe. 1

References

Guideline

Prognosis and Management of Second Post-Transplant Relapse AML on Venetoclax-Azacitidine

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia relapsing after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a center for international blood and marrow transplant research study.

Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2015

Guideline

Survival Rate for AML After Third Recurrence

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What blood tests should be ordered to assess AML status before stopping Venclexta (venetoclax)?
What is the prognosis for a 64-year-old male with recurrent Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) 20 months after a stem cell transplant, with cytogenetic abnormalities including CBFB (16q22) gene rearrangement and an extra signal for the RUNX1T1 (8q21.3) gene region?
What is the recommended treatment approach for a patient with a 3rd Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) recurrence, being the 1st recurrence after a stem cell transplant?
What is the prognosis for a 64-year-old male with recurrent Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), 20 months after stem cell transplant, who has developed hemorrhagic cystitis due to BK virus, and is currently being treated with venetoclax (Abbvie's Venclexta, generic name: venetoclax), after completing a 7-day course of Vidaza (azacitidine) and receiving a dose of Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin), with abnormal cytogenetics and chromosome analysis, mixed chimerism, and NRAS and WT1 mutations?
What is the significance of persistent cytogenetic abnormalities in a patient with trilineage dysplasia in sustained clinical remission on azacitidine (Aza) + venetoclax (Ven)?
Can Depakote (valproic acid) cause hyponatremia?
What is the appropriate management of hypertriglyceridaemia‑induced acute pancreatitis?
Should a patient who suffered a stroke at home without receiving acute treatment be seen promptly by a neurologist?
What is the recommended management for an adult with non‑alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and metabolic risk factors such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidaemia?
Can tranexamic acid (TXA) be used to stop an acute gastrointestinal bleed?
What evidence supports the use of apixaban in end‑stage renal disease patients on dialysis who require anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.