What type of pacemaker is suitable for patients with different cardiac conditions, such as sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular (AV) block, heart failure, or atrial fibrillation?

Pacemaker Selection by Cardiac Condition

Sinus Node Dysfunction (SND)

Dual-chamber pacing (DDD) is the preferred mode for patients with sinus node dysfunction and intact AV conduction, offering superior outcomes in preventing atrial fibrillation and pacemaker syndrome compared to single-chamber ventricular pacing. 1

Primary Recommendation

• Dual-chamber (DDD) or single-chamber atrial pacing (AAI) is recommended over single-chamber ventricular pacing (VVI) in patients with SND and intact AV conduction (Class I, Level of Evidence: A). 1
• Dual-chamber pacing reduces atrial fibrillation risk by 20% (hazard ratio 0.80) and stroke risk compared to ventricular pacing. 1
• Pacemaker syndrome occurs in up to 25% of patients with VVI pacing, causing significant quality of life impairment. 1, 2

Important Programming Consideration

• Program dual-chamber pacemakers to minimize ventricular pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation (Class IIa, Level of Evidence: B). 1, 3
• Minimizing ventricular pacing reduces persistent atrial fibrillation risk by 40% (hazard ratio 0.60) in patients with SND. 4
• The median percentage of ventricular pacing can be reduced from 99% to 9.1% using algorithms that promote intrinsic AV conduction. 4

Alternative Options

• Single-chamber atrial pacing (AAI) may be considered in highly selected patients with normal AV and ventricular conduction (Class IIb, Level of Evidence: B). 1
• However, 20-30% of SND patients will develop AV block within 5 years, making dual-chamber pacing safer long-term. 1, 3
• VVI pacing may be considered only when frequent pacing is not expected or significant comorbidities limit life expectancy (Class IIb, Level of Evidence: C). 1

Rate-Adaptive Features

• Rate-adaptive pacing (DDDR) is useful in patients with significant symptomatic chronotropic incompetence (Class IIa, Level of Evidence: C). 1
• Chronotropic incompetence is common in SND and should be reassessed during follow-up. 1

Contraindication

• Do not use dual-chamber or atrial pacing in patients with permanent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation where rhythm restoration is not planned (Class III, Level of Evidence: C). 1, 2

---

Atrioventricular (AV) Block

Dual-chamber pacing is the first-line recommendation for AV block, maintaining AV synchrony and preventing pacemaker syndrome, though single-chamber ventricular pacing is acceptable in specific clinical situations. 1

Primary Recommendation

• Dual-chamber pacing (DDD) is recommended for patients with AV block (Class I, Level of Evidence: C). 1, 5
• Dual-chamber pacing prevents pacemaker syndrome, which occurs in more than 25% of patients with AV block treated with VVI pacing. 1
• Quality of life and exercise capacity are consistently superior with dual-chamber pacing in crossover trials. 1, 6

Acceptable Alternatives

• Single-chamber ventricular pacing (VVI) is acceptable in specific situations (Class I, Level of Evidence: B): 1
  • Sedentary patients with limited activity levels 1, 2
  • Significant medical comorbidities likely to impact survival 1, 2
  • Technical limitations such as vascular access problems that increase atrial lead placement risk 1
  • Permanent atrial fibrillation (see below) 1

Special Consideration: VDD Pacing

• Single-lead dual-chamber (VDD) pacing is useful in patients with normal sinus node function and AV block, particularly younger patients with congenital AV block (Class IIa, Level of Evidence: C). 1, 2, 5
• VDD systems reduce procedure time and complications by eliminating the atrial lead while maintaining AV synchrony. 1
• The main limitation is potential atrial sensing degradation over time and inability to provide atrial pacing if SND develops. 1

Type 2 Second-Degree AV Block

• Permanent pacemaker implantation is recommended even in asymptomatic patients with Mobitz Type II block due to high risk of progression to complete heart block (Class I indication). 5
• Do not delay pacemaker implantation waiting for symptoms, as progression can be sudden and unpredictable. 5
• Dual-chamber pacing (DDD) is the preferred mode (Class I). 5

Contraindication

• Dual-chamber pacing should not be used in patients with AV block and permanent atrial fibrillation where rhythm restoration is not planned (Class III, Level of Evidence: C). 1

---

Atrial Fibrillation

Single-chamber ventricular pacing (VVI/VVIR) is the appropriate mode for patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, as there is no atrial contribution to maintain. 1, 2

Primary Recommendation

• VVI or VVIR pacing is recommended for patients in permanent or longstanding persistent AF where rhythm restoration is not planned (Class I). 1, 2
• Rate-responsive features (VVIR) may improve exercise capacity in active patients. 1

Post-AV Junction Ablation

• VVI pacing is appropriate following AV junction ablation for AF rate control (Class IIa, Level of Evidence: B). 1, 2
• The incidence of permanent AF is high (up to 39%) after AV junction ablation, even with continued antiarrhythmic therapy. 1

---

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Consider cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction who require pacing, especially if high percentage of ventricular pacing is expected. 1

Key Consideration

• In patients with LVEF ≤35% and indication for pacing, CRT should be considered if a high percentage of ventricular pacing is anticipated. 1
• Traditional right ventricular pacing can worsen heart failure due to ventricular desynchronization. 1
• This applies particularly to patients with SND or AV block who will require frequent ventricular pacing. 1

---

Other Specific Conditions

Hypersensitive Carotid Sinus Syndrome

• Dual-chamber or single-chamber ventricular pacing is useful (Class I, Level of Evidence: C). 1, 2
• Do not use AAI pacing (Class IIa contraindication). 1, 2

Neurocardiogenic Syncope

• Dual-chamber pacing is useful (Class I, Level of Evidence: C). 1, 2
• Do not use AAI pacing (Class IIa contraindication). 1, 2

Congenital Long QT Syndrome

• Dual-chamber or atrial pacing is recommended over ventricular pacing for symptomatic or high-risk patients (Class I, Level of Evidence: C). 1, 2

Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

• Dual-chamber pacing is useful for medically refractory, symptomatic patients with significant resting or provoked left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (Class I, Level of Evidence: C). 1, 2
• Do not use single-chamber pacing (Class IIa contraindication). 1

---

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Pacemaker Syndrome

• This occurs with loss of AV synchrony in ventricular pacing, causing lightheadedness, syncope, fatigue, and reduced quality of life. 1, 2
• It affects 25% or more of patients with VVI pacing and is a primary reason to choose dual-chamber pacing when atrial function is intact. 1, 2
• Crossover from VVI to DDD occurred in 26% of elderly patients in the PASE trial due to pacemaker syndrome. 7

Excessive Ventricular Pacing

• Conventional dual-chamber pacing results in 99% ventricular pacing, which causes ventricular desynchronization. 4
• This increases atrial fibrillation risk and may worsen heart failure. 4
• Always program algorithms to minimize unnecessary ventricular pacing in patients with intact AV conduction. 1, 3, 4

Wrong Mode for Permanent AF

• Never implant dual-chamber or atrial pacing modes in patients with permanent AF where rhythm restoration is not planned—this wastes resources and provides no benefit. 1, 2