What is the difference between with-the-rule and against-the-rule astigmatism and how are they corrected?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Astigmatism: With-the-Rule vs Against-the-Rule

With-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism has the steepest corneal meridian oriented vertically (approximately 90 degrees), while against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism has the steepest meridian oriented horizontally (approximately 180 degrees). 1

Definitions and Axis Orientation

With-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism:

  • The principal meridian of greatest refractive power is positioned between 75-105 degrees (near vertical) 2
  • This is the most common type of astigmatism, occurring in approximately 73% of eyes with astigmatism 3
  • More prevalent in younger individuals 4

Against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism:

  • The principal meridian of greatest power is positioned between 0-15 degrees and 165-180 degrees (near horizontal) 2
  • Less common, occurring in approximately 16% of eyes with astigmatism 3
  • Becomes more prevalent with aging as corneal curvature changes over time 4

Oblique astigmatism:

  • Occurs when principal meridians fall between 16-74 degrees and 106-164 degrees 2
  • Does not fit the WTR or ATR classification 2

Clinical Significance

ATR astigmatism provides superior uncorrected near vision compared to WTR astigmatism:

  • In pseudophakic patients with 1.00-1.50 diopters of myopic astigmatism, those with ATR achieved significantly better uncorrected near visual acuity (p<0.001) 5
  • Elderly patients (ages 60-80) with ATR myopic astigmatism after cataract surgery demonstrated significantly better uncorrected near vision (p<0.01) compared to those with WTR astigmatism 6
  • This occurs because the horizontal meridian focus (in ATR) provides better near vision function 5

ATR astigmatism is associated with worse amblyopia treatment outcomes:

  • Patients with hyperopic ATR astigmatism require longer duration of occlusion therapy and achieve fewer lines of visual acuity gain compared to hyperopic WTR patients (p=0.0143 and p=0.0000, respectively) 4
  • Similar findings occur in myopic ATR versus myopic WTR patients (p=0.0392 and p=0.0192, respectively) 4
  • Near vision impairment may be more amblyogenic than distance vision impairment during visual development 4

Correction Strategies

Low to moderate astigmatism (less than 3.00 diopters):

  • Can be corrected with soft toric contact lenses or rigid gas-permeable contact lenses 1
  • Full cylindrical correction may not be needed initially, especially in adults 1
  • Substantial changes in axis or power are poorly tolerated in patients with previously uncorrected or partially corrected astigmatism 1

High astigmatism (3.00 diopters or more):

  • Corrected effectively with rigid gas-permeable and hybrid contact lenses 1
  • Bitoric or back-surface toric contact lens designs minimize corneal bearing and improve centration for greater amounts of corneal astigmatism 1
  • Custom-designed soft toric contact lenses provide good centration, flexible wear schedules, and improved comfort 1
  • Rigid gas-permeable scleral lenses (diameter >17mm) are an option for high and/or irregular astigmatism, particularly with anisometropia 1

Refractive surgery considerations:

  • ATR astigmatism is a significant predictor of magnitude of error after small-incision lenticule extraction, contributing a constant 0.32 diopters of undercorrection (p<0.001) 3
  • Target-induced astigmatism and ATR/WTR orientation together explain approximately 25% of variation in surgical outcomes 3
  • Incorporating these parameters in preoperative planning may produce more consistent results, especially for high cylinder corrections 3

Common Pitfalls

Avoid overcorrection in first-time astigmatism correction:

  • Adults with astigmatism may not accept full cylindrical correction in their first pair of eyeglasses 1
  • Gradual correction may be better tolerated 1

Consider the functional advantage of ATR in presbyopic patients:

  • When planning cataract surgery or refractive procedures in older patients, leaving mild ATR myopic astigmatism (1.00-1.50 diopters) may provide better uncorrected near vision 6, 5
  • This can reduce dependence on reading glasses 5

Recognize that regular astigmatism has uniform curvature in each meridian with principal meridians 90 degrees apart, while irregular astigmatism (seen in keratoconus, corneal scarring, and post-surgical corneas) varies at different corneal points and cannot be fully corrected with spherocylindrical lenses 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.