Are cannon crew members at a higher risk of developing lung cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cannon Crew Members and Lung Cancer Risk

Cannon crew members likely face an elevated risk of lung cancer due to occupational exposure to combustion products and particulate matter from gunshot fumes, though this specific occupational group has not been formally studied or included in established lung cancer screening guidelines.

Occupational Carcinogen Exposure

The available evidence suggests cannon crews encounter lung carcinogens through their work:

  • Gunshot fumes contain toxic particulate matter and heavy metals that induce cytotoxicity and DNA damage in lung epithelial cells, with particles ranging from 30 nm to 3 μm in size and containing copper, zinc, and other metals 1

  • Occupational exposure to established lung carcinogens (arsenic, chromium, asbestos, nickel, cadmium, beryllium, silica, and diesel fumes) confers a mean relative risk of 1.59 for lung cancer development 2

  • Military personnel face unique operational exposures to lung carcinogens that may increase cancer risk beyond traditional screening criteria, though individual-level risk quantification remains unclear 3

Risk Magnitude and Context

The evidence framework for understanding cannon crew risk:

  • Combustion products and particulate matter are established lung carcinogens, with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from combustion showing a pooled relative risk of 1.75 (95% CI: 1.33-2.30) for lung cancer 2

  • Firefighters, who face similar combustion product exposures, have documented elevated cancer risk with a mean relative risk of 1.59 when exposed to occupational lung carcinogens 4

  • The carcinogenic effect is multiplicative with smoking, meaning cannon crew members who smoke face substantially greater risk than either exposure alone 2, 4

Critical Risk Modification

Smoking cessation is the single most important intervention for cannon crew members, as tobacco smoking potentiates the carcinogenic effects of occupational exposures through synergistic mechanisms 4, 5, 6, 7

Important Caveats

  • No direct epidemiological studies have specifically quantified lung cancer risk in cannon crew members, so risk estimates are extrapolated from similar occupational exposures 3

  • Exposure intensity and duration matter: The toxicity of gunshot fumes varies by ammunition type, with steel-core ammunition (like NM229) producing more cytotoxic and genotoxic effects than lead-core ammunition 1

  • Current lung cancer screening guidelines do not formally incorporate occupational exposures beyond age and smoking history, though the NCCN acknowledges occupational carcinogens increase risk 2

  • Individual risk assessment should consider cumulative exposure duration, ammunition types used, ventilation conditions during firing, and personal protective equipment use, in addition to smoking history 1, 3

References

Research

Toxic effects of gunshot fumes from different ammunitions for small arms on lung cells exposed at the air liquid interface.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 2021

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Cancer Risk in Firefighters

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Lung Cancer 2020: Epidemiology, Etiology, and Prevention.

Clinics in chest medicine, 2020

Research

Epidemiology of lung cancer.

Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.