Is there medical evidence that excessive football play increases the incidence of Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) tears?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Evidence on Football and LCL Tears

The available medical evidence does not support a specific link between playing football and increased incidence of Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) tears. In fact, LCL injuries are notably rare in football compared to other knee injuries.

Key Epidemiological Findings

LCL Injury Incidence in Football

  • LCL tears represent only 1.1% of all knee injuries in athletic populations, making them one of the least common knee ligament injuries 1
  • In a comprehensive 10-year study of 7,769 knee injuries across multiple sports, LCL injuries were primarily associated with tennis and gymnastics, not football 1
  • Football players predominantly sustain ACL tears (20.3%), medial meniscus tears (10.8%), and MCL injuries (7.9%)—not LCL tears 1

Most Common Football Knee Injuries

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, the most commonly injured body parts in football at all ages are the knee, ankle, hand, and back, with most injuries being contusions, musculotendinous strains, and ligamentous sprains 2

When specific knee ligament injuries occur in American football:

  • ACL tears are the predominant ligament injury 3, 4
  • MCL injuries occur more frequently than LCL injuries 1, 3
  • PCL tears represent only 0.65% of knee injuries 1

Contact Mechanism Considerations

Injury Patterns in Football

  • Approximately 46% of severe football injuries involve direct contact, while 54% are non-contact mechanisms 5
  • For ACL injuries specifically, 72.5% occur via non-contact mechanisms (except in offensive linemen where only 20% are non-contact) 4
  • Tackling and being tackled account for approximately half of all high school and college football-related injuries 2

LCL-Specific Mechanism

The LCL is typically injured through varus stress (force pushing the knee inward), which is an uncommon mechanism in football compared to the valgus stress (knee pushed outward) that causes MCL and ACL injuries 1

Clinical Implications

There is no evidence-based reason to counsel patients that excessive football play specifically increases LCL tear risk. The injury pattern in football overwhelmingly favors:

  • ACL tears (particularly from pivoting/cutting with dynamic valgus moments) 4
  • MCL injuries (from valgus stress during contact) 1, 3
  • Meniscal tears 6, 1

Risk Factors That Actually Matter

If concerned about knee injuries from football participation, focus on these evidence-based risk factors:

  • Previous knee injuries increase severe injury risk by 24% 5
  • Joint instability and poor physical conditioning 5
  • Foul play accounts for 31% of severe injuries 5
  • Game participation carries higher injury risk than practice (59% vs 41%) 5

Long-Term Considerations

While LCL tears are not a primary concern, moderate-certainty evidence shows that various knee injuries from football (cruciate ligament, collateral ligament, meniscal, chondral injuries) increase odds of symptomatic osteoarthritis 2. This represents a more significant long-term morbidity concern than LCL injury incidence.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Knee Injuries in American Football: An Epidemiological Review.

American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.), 2016

Research

Severe injuries in football players. Influencing factors.

The American journal of sports medicine, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.