Can shingles cause symptoms similar to those of kidney stones, such as severe pain, and if so, how are they managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Shingles Cause Kidney Stone-Like Symptoms?

Yes, shingles (herpes zoster) can absolutely mimic kidney stone symptoms, particularly when the rash involves the flank or abdominal dermatomes, causing severe unilateral pain that can be indistinguishable from renal colic before the characteristic vesicular rash appears.

Understanding the Clinical Overlap

Pain Presentation Similarities

Herpes zoster causes severe pain in a dermatomal distribution that can precede the rash by several days 1, 2. When VZV reactivates in thoracic or lumbar nerve roots (T10-L2 dermatomes), the resulting pain:

  • Presents as severe, unilateral flank or abdominal pain that patients and clinicians may initially attribute to kidney stones 1
  • Can occur 1-5 days before any visible rash appears, creating a diagnostic challenge during this "pre-eruptive phase" 2
  • May be accompanied by dysuria or urinary symptoms if lower dermatomes are involved, further mimicking urolithiasis 2

Key Distinguishing Features

The critical differentiating factor is the dermatomal distribution of pain in shingles versus the colicky, radiating pattern typical of kidney stones 3, 1. However, this distinction becomes clear only after careful examination:

  • Shingles pain follows a band-like pattern that stops at the midline and corresponds to specific nerve root distributions 1, 2
  • Kidney stone pain typically radiates from flank to groin and is associated with restlessness, whereas shingles pain is more constant and burning in quality 3
  • The appearance of grouped vesicles on an erythematous base within 24-72 hours confirms herpes zoster diagnosis 1, 2

Diagnostic Approach in the Emergency Setting

Initial Assessment Priorities

When a patient presents with severe flank pain, examine the skin carefully for any prodromal signs including:

  • Hyperesthesia or altered sensation in a dermatomal pattern 1
  • Early erythema or papules that may precede vesicle formation 2
  • Unilateral distribution that respects the midline 1, 2

Imaging Considerations

If herpes zoster is suspected but not yet confirmed, avoid unnecessary CT imaging that would be standard for suspected nephrolithiasis 4. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria indicate that noncontrast CT has 97% sensitivity for urolithiasis 4, but this radiation exposure is unnecessary if clinical examination suggests zoster.

Ultrasound can be used as a first-line imaging modality if stone disease remains in the differential, as it avoids radiation and can identify hydronephrosis with high specificity (94.4%) for symptomatic stones 4.

Management When Shingles is Confirmed

Immediate Antiviral Therapy

Initiate oral antiviral therapy immediately upon diagnosis, ideally within 72 hours of rash onset 5, 6:

  • Valacyclovir 1 gram orally three times daily for 7 days is the first-line treatment 5, 6
  • Acyclovir 800 mg orally five times daily for 7 days is an alternative option 5, 6

Escalation for Severe Disease

For disseminated or multi-dermatomal herpes zoster, switch to intravenous acyclovir 5-10 mg/kg every 8 hours until clinical improvement occurs 5, 6. This is particularly important in:

  • Immunocompromised patients 5, 6
  • Cases with visceral involvement 5
  • Ophthalmic zoster (which can cause stroke-like complications) 1

Pain Management

Aggressive pain control is essential as herpes zoster pain can be severe and lead to postherpetic neuralgia 1, 2:

  • Combine antivirals with analgesics appropriate to pain severity 2
  • Consider gabapentinoids early for neuropathic pain management 2
  • Avoid corticosteroids in immunocompromised patients due to dissemination risk 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Delayed Diagnosis in the Pre-Eruptive Phase

The most common error is failing to consider herpes zoster before the rash appears 1, 2. Maintain high clinical suspicion when:

  • Pain is strictly unilateral and dermatomal 1
  • Patient reports burning or hyperesthetic quality to pain 1, 2
  • Risk factors are present (age >50, immunosuppression, recent stress) 2

Inappropriate Workup

Do not pursue extensive urological workup if clinical features suggest zoster 4. The ACR guidelines emphasize that imaging should be guided by clinical probability 4, and dermatomal pain patterns should redirect evaluation toward neurological causes.

Treatment Timing

Antiviral efficacy decreases significantly if initiated beyond 72 hours of rash onset 5. However, immunocompromised patients require treatment regardless of timing 5, 6.

When Both Conditions Coexist

Rarely, patients may have concurrent herpes zoster and nephrolithiasis. If imaging was already obtained before zoster diagnosis and reveals stones, manage both conditions appropriately 4:

  • Continue antiviral therapy for herpes zoster 5, 6
  • Stones <5mm typically pass spontaneously and can be managed conservatively 3
  • Larger stones or those causing obstruction require urological intervention 4

Monitor for complications of either condition, particularly in immunocompromised patients who are at higher risk for disseminated zoster and infectious complications of nephrolithiasis 5, 7.

References

Research

Severe complications of herpes zoster.

Herpes : the journal of the IHMF, 2007

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Herpes Zoster

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Herpes Zoster

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Treatment of the Infected Stone.

The Urologic clinics of North America, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.