What are the visual representations of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Visual Representations of ERCP

ERCP produces fluoroscopic images of the biliary and pancreatic ductal systems obtained by injecting contrast through an endoscope positioned in the duodenum, creating cholangiograms and pancreatograms that visualize the anatomy and pathology of these ductal structures. 1

What ERCP Imaging Shows

Technical Procedure and Image Acquisition

  • ERCP is performed by advancing an endoscope into the duodenum, cannulating the ampulla of Vater, and injecting contrast into the common bile duct (CBD) while obtaining fluoroscopic images to visualize the biliary tree. 1

  • The procedure captures real-time fluoroscopic images during contrast injection, creating a "roadmap" of the bile ducts and pancreatic ducts. 1

  • Images demonstrate the intrahepatic bile ducts, extrahepatic bile ducts, common hepatic duct, CBD, cystic duct, and pancreatic duct system. 1

Specific Visual Features on ERCP

In Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC):

  • Multifocal intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct strictures creating a characteristic "beaded" appearance 1
  • Slight biliary dilatation with diverticular outpouchings 1
  • "Pruned tree" appearance in chronic stages 1

In Biliary Obstruction:

  • Filling defects representing stones within the ductal system 1
  • Strictures with upstream ductal dilatation 1
  • Abrupt cutoffs suggesting malignant obstruction 1

In Periampullary Perforation (Type 2):

  • Contrast extravasation beyond the normal ductal boundaries 1
  • Visualization of retroperitoneal air on fluoroscopy 1

Important Limitations and Pitfalls

Anatomic Variants That Can Confuse Interpretation

  • Normal anatomic pancreatic and biliary variants can mimic pathology on ERCP, requiring careful interpretation to avoid misdiagnosis. 2

  • Artifacts associated with the examination technique itself (injection pressure, air bubbles, incomplete filling) can create false impressions of strictures or filling defects. 2

Technical Limitations

  • ERCP is limited to imaging only the biliary ductal system without visualization of surrounding structures, unlike cross-sectional imaging. 3

  • The procedure cannot visualize the liver parenchyma, vascular structures, or extrahepatic masses that may be causing ductal compression. 3

  • In patients with previous gastroenteric anastomoses (such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass), ERCP is technically difficult as the endoscope cannot easily reach the biliopancreatic limb. 1, 4

Clinical Context: When ERCP Imaging Is Appropriate

ERCP Has Shifted to Primarily Therapeutic Role

  • Due to advances in cross-sectional imaging (particularly MRCP), ERCP now serves almost exclusively as a therapeutic rather than diagnostic procedure. 1, 3

  • MRCP should be the principal imaging modality for suspected biliary pathology, with ERCP reserved for cases requiring tissue acquisition or therapeutic intervention. 1, 3

Specific Indications for ERCP Imaging

  • When therapeutic intervention is anticipated simultaneously (stone extraction, stent placement, sphincterotomy). 1, 3

  • When MRCP is equivocal or contraindicated and clinical suspicion for biliary pathology remains high. 1

  • For tissue diagnosis via brushings when malignancy is suspected. 1, 3

  • In acute cholangitis requiring urgent biliary drainage within 24 hours. 5

Critical Safety Considerations

  • ERCP carries a 4-5.2% risk of major complications (pancreatitis, cholangitis, hemorrhage, perforation) and 0.4% mortality risk. 1

  • Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurs in 2.3-5% of cases. 6, 5

  • Cholangitis occurs in less than 1% when proper technique is used. 6

  • Perforation risk is particularly elevated with sphincterotomy and in patients with altered anatomy. 1, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Anatomic variants and artifacts in ERCP interpretation.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 1991

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Bile and Pancreatic Duct Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Urgent and emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for gallstone-induced acute cholangitis and pancreatitis.

Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.