What is the Killip classification used for in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Killip Classification in Acute Myocardial Infarction

What It Is and Why It Matters

The Killip classification is a clinical bedside tool designed to rapidly stratify the severity of heart failure and circulatory derangement in patients with acute myocardial infarction, providing powerful prognostic information that directly predicts both short-term and long-term mortality. 1

The classification is based entirely on physical examination findings and chest X-ray, making it immediately applicable without requiring invasive hemodynamic monitoring. 1

The Four Killip Classes

Killip Class I

  • Definition: No heart failure and no clinical signs of cardiac decompensation 1
  • Physical findings: Clear lung fields, no S3 gallop, no rales 1
  • In-hospital mortality: 2.2-9.9% 1, 2
  • Frequency: Represents approximately 81% of STEMI patients 2

Killip Class II

  • Definition: Heart failure with pulmonary congestion 1
  • Physical findings: Rales in the lower half of lung fields, S3 gallop, pulmonary venous hypertension on chest X-ray 1
  • In-hospital mortality: 8.7-10.1% 1, 2
  • Frequency: Represents approximately 9.5% of STEMI patients 2

Killip Class III

  • Definition: Severe heart failure with frank pulmonary edema 1
  • Physical findings: Rales throughout both lung fields 1
  • In-hospital mortality: 22.4-92.6% 1, 2
  • Frequency: Represents approximately 5.6% of STEMI patients 2

Killip Class IV

  • Definition: Cardiogenic shock 1
  • Physical findings: Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, evidence of peripheral vasoconstriction including oliguria, cyanosis, and diaphoresis (sweating) 1
  • In-hospital mortality: 55.5-100% 1, 2
  • Frequency: Represents approximately 3.5% of STEMI patients 2

Prognostic Power Across Different MI Types

The Killip classification is validated and equally powerful in both STEMI and NSTEMI populations, making it universally applicable across all acute coronary syndromes. 3, 4

In NSTEMI Patients

  • Killip class III/IV is the single most powerful predictor of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 2.35) and 6-month mortality (hazard ratio 2.12) 3
  • Killip class II independently predicts mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio 1.73) and 6 months (hazard ratio 1.52) 3
  • Patients with Killip class II-IV represent only 11% of NSTEMI patients but account for approximately 30% of all deaths 3

In STEMI Patients

  • The classification maintains its prognostic validity even in the modern era of primary PCI and reperfusion therapy 4, 5
  • Long-term mortality (5-year follow-up) remains significantly stratified by Killip class 4

In MINOCA Patients

  • High Killip class (>I) is associated with three-fold increased long-term mortality and four-fold risk of heart failure hospitalization 6
  • Killip classification is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio 2.66) in MINOCA 6

Clinical Application Algorithm

Step 1: Immediate Assessment at Presentation

  • Auscultate lung fields bilaterally for rales (crackles) 1
  • Listen for S3 gallop rhythm 1
  • Measure blood pressure (systolic <90 mmHg indicates possible Class IV) 1
  • Assess for peripheral hypoperfusion: cold/clammy skin, cyanosis, oliguria 1
  • Obtain chest X-ray to evaluate pulmonary congestion 1

Step 2: Assign Killip Class

  • No findings: Class I 1
  • Rales in lower half of lungs OR S3 gallop: Class II 1
  • Rales throughout both lung fields: Class III 1
  • Hypotension + signs of shock: Class IV 1

Step 3: Risk Stratification Integration

  • Combine Killip class with five key variables for comprehensive risk assessment: age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and ST depression 3
  • These five factors together provide >70% of prognostic information for mortality 3
  • Use Killip class in validated risk scores like TIMI and GRACE for NSTEMI patients 1

Step 4: Treatment Intensity Based on Class

  • Class I: Standard acute MI management with close monitoring 1
  • Class II: Add diuretics (loop diuretic IV unless contraindicated), consider dobutamine 2.5 μg/kg/min if congestion predominates 7
  • Class III: Aggressive diuretic therapy, consider non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP), dobutamine, and nitroglicerine 7
  • Class IV: Immediate shock protocol with inotropic support (dopamine 2.5-5.0 μg/kg/min or dobutamine), urgent revascularization, consider intra-aortic balloon pump and mechanical circulatory support 7, 8

Critical Management Considerations for High Killip Classes

For Killip Class IV (Cardiogenic Shock)

  • Immediate revascularization is mandatory: PCI or emergency CABG within 36 hours for patients <75 years 7
  • Transfer to tertiary center with 24/7 cardiac catheterization and mechanical circulatory support capability 8
  • Most patients require intra-aortic balloon pump placement during preparation for angiography 7
  • Target hemodynamic parameters: wedge pressure <20 mmHg and cardiac index >2 L/min/m² 7, 8
  • Implement multidisciplinary shock team approach, which has been associated with improved 30-day mortality 8

Respiratory Support Algorithm

  • Class II-III with respiratory distress: Start CPAP immediately 7
  • Respiratory rate >25 breaths/min or SaO₂ <90%: Consider non-invasive positive pressure ventilation 7, 8
  • PaO₂ <60 mmHg despite 100% oxygen at 8-10 L/min: Proceed to endotracheal intubation 7

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Pitfall 1: Underestimating Class II Patients

  • Killip class II patients have nearly 9% in-hospital mortality and 15% mortality at 6 months 1, 2
  • Solution: Treat Class II aggressively with diuretics and close hemodynamic monitoring; do not dismiss as "mild" heart failure 7

Pitfall 2: Delaying Revascularization in High Killip Classes

  • Mortality in Class IV approaches 100% without urgent intervention 2
  • Solution: Activate catheterization laboratory immediately for Class III-IV patients; do not wait for medical stabilization 7, 8

Pitfall 3: Using Nitroglycerin in Hypotensive Patients

  • Nitroglycerin can worsen hypotension in Class IV patients 7
  • Solution: Only use nitroglycerin if systolic blood pressure allows 15 mmHg drop without falling below 90 mmHg 7

Pitfall 4: Missing Mechanical Complications

  • Mechanical complications (ventricular septal defect, papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture) dramatically worsen prognosis 7, 8
  • Solution: Perform immediate echocardiography in all Class III-IV patients to identify surgically correctable lesions 7, 8

Pitfall 5: Inadequate Monitoring in Class I Patients

  • Even Class I patients have 7-10% in-hospital mortality 2, 5
  • Solution: Continuous cardiac monitoring and serial reassessment, as patients can deteriorate to higher Killip classes 1

Prognostic Factors That Modify Killip Class Risk

Beyond Killip classification alone, three factors significantly increase mortality risk across all classes: 2

  • Presence of diabetes mellitus
  • History of smoking
  • Body mass index >30 kg/m²

Additional high-risk features that predict progression to higher Killip classes: 7

  • Prior heart failure (odds ratio 3.2)
  • Multivessel coronary disease (odds ratio 1.6)
  • TIMI flow <3 after intervention (odds ratio 1.8)

Long-Term Implications

The Killip classification maintains its prognostic power well beyond the acute hospitalization, predicting mortality at 5-year follow-up with similar discrimination as for in-hospital outcomes. 4

The classification pattern remains consistent between NSTEMI and STEMI patients for long-term survival, making it a durable risk stratification tool throughout the patient's post-MI course. 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.