What is the Killip classification?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Killip Classification System

The Killip classification is a clinical tool that provides an estimate of the severity of myocardial derangement in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on physical examination findings and chest X-ray results. 1

The Four Stages of Killip Classification

The classification consists of four stages that stratify patients according to the severity of heart failure following AMI:

  • Stage I: No heart failure. No clinical signs of cardiac decompensation.
  • Stage II: Heart failure. Diagnostic criteria include rales, S3 gallop, and pulmonary venous hypertension. Pulmonary congestion with wet rales in the lower half of the lung fields.
  • Stage III: Severe heart failure. Frank pulmonary edema with rales throughout the lung fields.
  • Stage IV: Cardiogenic shock. Signs include hypotension (SBP < 90 mmHg) and evidence of peripheral vasoconstriction such as oliguria, cyanosis, and diaphoresis (sweating). 1

Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value

The Killip classification has substantial prognostic implications:

  • It strongly predicts both short-term and long-term mortality after AMI 2

  • Mortality rates increase significantly with higher Killip class:

    • Class I: Approximately 2-10% in-hospital mortality
    • Class II: 10-20% in-hospital mortality
    • Class III: Up to 90% in-hospital mortality
    • Class IV: 36-100% in-hospital mortality 3, 4
  • The classification provides more than 70% of the prognostic information when combined with four other factors: age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and ST depression 5

Clinical Application

The Killip classification should be determined immediately upon presentation in all patients with suspected AMI to:

  1. Guide initial treatment decisions
  2. Determine the level of monitoring required
  3. Identify patients who may need more aggressive interventions

Management Considerations by Class

  • Class I: Standard AMI management
  • Class II: Additional heart failure treatment with diuretics and careful monitoring
  • Class III: Requires aggressive treatment of pulmonary edema, including oxygen therapy and possibly non-invasive or invasive ventilation
  • Class IV: Immediate interventions for cardiogenic shock, including consideration of mechanical circulatory support and urgent revascularization 1

Important Clinical Pearls

  1. While originally developed for ST-elevation MI, the Killip classification has proven valuable in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes as well 5

  2. The classification retains its prognostic value even in the era of primary reperfusion therapy 4

  3. Patients in higher Killip classes (especially III and IV) represent a small percentage of AMI patients (approximately 9-15%) but account for a disproportionately high percentage of deaths (around 30%) 5

  4. The classification has recently been validated in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), where higher Killip class still predicts worse outcomes 6

  5. Early primary angioplasty has contributed to decreased mortality in Killip IV patients, though appropriate medical therapy remains critically important 4

The Killip classification remains a simple yet powerful bedside tool that helps clinicians rapidly assess risk and guide management decisions in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.