Is a Computed Tomography (CT) stone protocol the same as a CT abdomen and pelvis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CT Stone Protocol vs. CT Abdomen and Pelvis: Key Differences

No, a CT stone protocol is not the same as a CT abdomen and pelvis—the stone protocol is specifically a noncontrast CT optimized for detecting urolithiasis, while CT abdomen and pelvis typically refers to contrast-enhanced imaging not specifically tailored for stone detection. 1

Technical Distinctions

CT Stone Protocol (Noncontrast CT for Urolithiasis)

  • Performed without intravenous contrast to maximize stone visualization 1
  • Optimized specifically for detecting urinary tract calculi with thin-slice acquisition 1
  • Covers kidneys, ureters, and bladder to evaluate the entire urinary tract 1
  • Low-dose technique is now standard, with pooled sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 95% for stone detection at <3 mSv 1
  • Unenhanced CT has higher sensitivity than contrast-enhanced CT for detecting small renal calculi 1

CT Abdomen and Pelvis (Standard Protocol)

  • Typically includes intravenous contrast (used in 90% of abdominal/pelvic CT examinations) 2
  • Not specifically tailored for urinary tract evaluation and lacks both precontrast and excretory phases 1
  • Standard collimation averaging 7 mm for general abdominal protocols (versus 5 mm for renal-specific protocols) 2
  • Designed for broader evaluation of abdominal and pelvic organs, not optimized for stone detection 1

Clinical Performance Differences

Stone Detection Capabilities

  • Noncontrast CT (stone protocol) detects urolithiasis with 96-99% accuracy across multiple studies 1
  • Both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT can detect stones, but unenhanced is superior for small calculi 1
  • Contrast-enhanced CT may obscure small stones due to opacification of surrounding structures 1

When Each Protocol Is Appropriate

Use CT Stone Protocol (Noncontrast) When:

  • Primary concern is urolithiasis in patients with acute flank pain 1
  • Evaluating stone size and location for treatment planning (spontaneous passage vs. intervention) 1
  • Minimizing radiation exposure is a priority, especially in young patients 1

Use CT Abdomen and Pelvis (With Contrast) When:

  • Evaluating for alternative diagnoses beyond stones (abscess, malignancy, vascular pathology) 1
  • Assessing complications such as infection, pyelonephritis, or renal abscess 1
  • Broader differential diagnosis requires comprehensive abdominal evaluation 1

Important Caveats

Avoid Common Pitfalls

  • Don't order contrast-enhanced CT as first-line for suspected stones—it provides no advantage and may reduce sensitivity for small calculi 1
  • Ensure the protocol covers the entire urinary tract including pelvis to detect distal ureteral stones 1
  • Low-dose protocols sacrifice some sensitivity for smaller stones (<3 mm), but this trade-off is generally acceptable 1

CT Urography (CTU) Is Different from Both

  • CTU includes both noncontrast AND contrast phases with delayed excretory imaging 1
  • CTU is not indicated for routine stone evaluation—it adds radiation without improving stone detection 1
  • CTU is reserved for hematuria workup or urothelial pathology, not acute stone disease 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Helical CT protocols for the abdomen and pelvis: a survey.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2000

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.