Normal QT/QTc Interval Values
Normal QTc intervals are <450 ms in men and <460 ms in women according to the American College of Cardiology, though some guidelines use slightly different thresholds. 1
Gender-Specific Normal Values
The definition of normal QTc varies slightly depending on the guideline source, but the most widely accepted values are:
Women: Normal QTc <460 ms 1, 2
- Values ≥460 ms are considered abnormally prolonged 2
Gender differences emerge after puberty (ages 12-16 years), with approximately 8-10 ms difference between males and females 1
Children <12 years: The 98th percentile limit is approximately 450 ms without gender differentiation 1
Short QT Intervals
- QTc ≤390 ms is considered a short QT interval in both men and women 1, 2
- For short QT syndrome specifically, values of 330 ms (310 ms in children) for uncorrected QT and 360-380 ms for QTc have been proposed 3, 1
Critical Thresholds for Risk Stratification
QTc prolongation severity can be graded as follows 1:
- Grade 1: 450-480 ms
- Grade 2: 481-500 ms
- Grade 3: >500 ms
A QTc >500 ms or an increase >60 ms from baseline is associated with increased risk of Torsades de Pointes, a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia 1, 2
The FDA recommends reporting three severity levels: >350 ms, >480 ms, and >500 ms 1, 2
QT Correction Formula Considerations
The method used to correct QT for heart rate significantly affects the calculated QTc value:
Bazett's formula (QTc = QT/√RR) is most commonly used but has significant limitations, including overcorrection at heart rates >80 bpm and undercorrection at heart rates <60 bpm 1, 2
Fridericia's formula (QTc = QT/∛RR) is more accurate, especially at higher heart rates, and is recommended by the FDA 1, 2
Upper normal limits vary by formula: Using a normal ECG database, Bazett yielded 483 ms, while Fridericia, Framingham, and Hodges all yielded approximately 457-460 ms 4
Measurement Considerations and Common Pitfalls
QT corrections may be inaccurate at heart rates <40 bpm or >120 bpm 3, 1
Key pitfalls to avoid:
Not accounting for gender differences when interpreting QTc values, particularly in post-pubertal individuals 1
Failing to recognize that athletes often have longer uncorrected QT intervals due to lower resting heart rates, though their QTc is usually within normal limits 3, 1
Using Bazett's formula at extreme heart rates, which can lead to misclassification—30% of normal ECGs would be reported as abnormal using a 440 ms threshold with Bazett's formula 4
Not considering electrolyte abnormalities (particularly hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypocalcemia) that can affect QTc values 1
Ignoring that QT interval prolongs in ventricular conduction defects, requiring adjustment for QRS duration 1, 2
Gray Zone Values Requiring Further Evaluation
QTc intervals between 440-500 ms in males and 460-500 ms in females represent a "gray zone" that requires detailed assessment to achieve a definitive diagnosis 3
This assessment should include:
- Careful family and personal history for syncope or sudden death 3
- Cascade ECG screening of family members 3
- 24-hour ECG monitoring for serial QTc evaluation 3
- Exercise testing to assess QT interval shortening during effort 3
- Evaluation for acquired causes including QT-prolonging drugs, electrolyte disorders, and metabolic changes 3
A QTc value of 500 ms, otherwise unexplained, is indicative of unequivocal long QT syndrome, regardless of family history and symptoms 3