Treatment of Adult Craniostenosis
Critical Clarification
The term "craniostenosis" in adults requires immediate clarification, as it refers to two completely different conditions with entirely different treatments:
If Referring to Craniosynostosis (Premature Skull Suture Fusion)
Surgical correction via frontocranial remodeling with an intracranial approach is the definitive treatment for adults with unoperated craniosynostosis causing significant deformity. 1
Surgical Approach
- Frontocranial remodeling with intracranial approach is required in most cases to achieve adequate correction of the frontal and upper cranial vault deformities 1
- Limited approaches or frontal implants alone are only appropriate for mild cases, as they avoid intracranial surgery but provide inferior results 1
- The operation is technically more complex in adults compared to infants, but successful morphologic correction is achievable 1
Key Considerations
- The psychological impact of facial disfigurement is substantial, making most young adults willing to accept the risks of radical surgical correction 1
- No significant perioperative complications occurred in a series of 13 adult patients (mean age 24 years) undergoing correction 1
- Late revisions for bony irregularities may be needed in some cases, performed through limited approaches 1
Important Caveat
- Early surgical correction in infancy is strongly preferable (optimal age 3-6 months), but adult correction remains feasible when early intervention was not performed 1, 2
If Referring to Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (Atherosclerotic Disease)
Aggressive medical management with antiplatelet therapy is superior to endovascular stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. 3
First-Line Medical Management
- Dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel 75 mg + aspirin 75-81 mg daily) for 21-30 days is recommended for symptomatic patients 3
- Loading dose of aspirin 160 mg should be given immediately after brain imaging excludes hemorrhage 3
- After 21-30 days, transition to single antiplatelet agent (aspirin or clopidogrel alone) 3
Why Medical Management Over Stenting
- The SAMMPRIS trial demonstrated that aggressive medical management is superior to intracranial stenting for reducing morbidity and mortality 3
- Endovascular stenting carries substantial procedural risks: 7.9% stroke rate, 3.4% death rate, and 9.5% combined stroke or death rate perioperatively 4
- High restenosis rates (up to 30-32%) occur with stenting, with 39% of restenoses being symptomatic 4
Endovascular Intervention Considerations
- Stenting should only be considered for highly selected patients with symptomatic stenosis ≥50% refractory to medical therapy 4
- The Wingspan stent system has FDA humanitarian device exemption for this narrow indication 4
- Procedures should only be performed at high-volume academic centers with significant neurovascular expertise 4
- A 14% rate of stroke, hemorrhage, or death at 30 days or ipsilateral stroke at 6 months was observed in NIH registry data 4
Risk Stratification
- Severe stenosis ≥70% carries highest stroke risk (hazard ratio 2.00) in the territory of the stenotic artery 4
- Patients enrolled early (≤17 days) after qualifying ischemic event have higher stroke risk (hazard ratio 1.72) 4