What are the results of the POUT trial for patients with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) + upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) regarding adjuvant chemotherapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

POUT Trial LVI+ Subgroup Results

Direct Answer to Your Question

The POUT trial did not publish separate subgroup results specifically for the LVI+ (lymphovascular invasion positive) population. The trial enrolled patients with pT2-T4 pN0-N3 M0 or pTany N1-3 M0 disease, which included patients with LVI as part of the high-risk criteria, but LVI-specific outcomes were not reported as a distinct subgroup analysis in the published results 1, 2.

What the POUT Trial Actually Reported

Overall Trial Results

  • Disease-free survival benefit: Adjuvant chemotherapy showed HR 0.45 (95% CI 0.30-0.68; p=0.0001) at median 30-month follow-up 1
  • Updated 5-year results: DFS was 62% versus 45% (HR 0.55,95% CI 0.38-0.80, p=0.001) at 65-month median follow-up 2
  • Overall survival: 5-year OS was 66% versus 57% (HR 0.68,95% CI 0.46-1.00, p=0.049) 2

Inclusion Criteria (Which Encompassed LVI+ Patients)

  • The trial included patients with pT2-T4 pN0-N3 M0 or pTany N1-3 M0 disease after nephroureterectomy 1, 2
  • LVI+ patients were part of this high-risk cohort, but not analyzed separately 1

Why LVI+ Matters Clinically

LVI as an Independent Prognostic Factor

  • LVI is present in approximately 19-20% of UTUC patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy 3
  • LVI independently predicts worse outcomes: 5-year RFS of 45.1% versus 79.3% without LVI (p<0.0001) 3
  • LVI independently predicts CSS: HR 5.9 (p<0.0001) for cancer-specific survival 3
  • Even in pN0/Nx disease, LVI remains prognostic: HR 2.1 for RFS and HR 2.3 for CSS (both p<0.001) 3

Clinical Implications for LVI+ Patients

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes in high-risk UTUC (which includes LVI+ patients): propensity-matched analysis showed 5-year CSS of 69.0% with adjuvant chemotherapy versus 58.9% with surgery alone (p=0.030) 4
  • LVI+ patients should be considered for adjuvant therapy based on their high-risk status 3

Where to Find POUT Trial Results

Primary Publication

  • Lancet 2020: Initial results with primary endpoint (DFS) analysis 1
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology 2024: Updated final results with mature OS data 2

Access Links

You can access these publications through:

  • PubMed (search "POUT trial upper tract urothelial")
  • ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT01993979 1
  • Direct journal websites (Lancet and JCO)

Current Guideline Recommendations for LVI+ UTUC

Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended for all high-risk UTUC patients, including those with LVI+, based on POUT trial evidence 5, 6.

Specific Recommendations

  • Cisplatin-based chemotherapy preferred: Gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen for cisplatin-eligible patients 5, 6
  • Carboplatin-based chemotherapy NOT recommended: Due to insufficient evidence from POUT subgroup analysis 5
  • Timing: Initiate within 90 days of nephroureterectomy 1, 6

Common Pitfall

Do not wait for LVI-specific subgroup data to make treatment decisions. The POUT trial demonstrated clear benefit for the entire high-risk population (which includes LVI+ patients), and LVI is an established independent adverse prognostic factor that warrants adjuvant therapy 6, 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.