What is the treatment for Bankart tears?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Bankart Tears

For Bankart lesions, arthroscopic repair is the recommended surgical approach for most patients with symptomatic anterior shoulder instability, while the specific treatment strategy depends critically on the presence and extent of glenoid bone loss.

Initial Management Decision

The treatment pathway for Bankart tears fundamentally depends on whether the lesion is purely soft tissue (labral-ligamentous) or involves significant bone loss (bony Bankart):

Soft Tissue Bankart Lesions

Arthroscopic Bankart repair is the primary surgical treatment for symptomatic soft tissue Bankart lesions, as it effectively restores glenohumeral stability while preserving shoulder motion 1. The classic Bankart repair technique has demonstrated excellent long-term outcomes with only 3.5% recurrence rates and 74% excellent results, with 98% of patients rating their outcomes as excellent or good 2.

  • Arthroscopic repair precisely restores posterior and inferior glenohumeral joint laxity to match the intact joint state 1
  • Patients can expect early return of motion and function, with 69% achieving full range of motion 2
  • Most patients (97-98%) return to competitive athletic activities without limitation 2

Bony Bankart Lesions

The treatment algorithm for bony Bankart lesions is determined by fracture characteristics 3, 4:

For acute fractures involving <15-20% of the inferior glenoid diameter:

  • Non-operative treatment can be successful if the fracture is anatomically reduced after shoulder reduction 3
  • However, in patients with high-risk profiles for recurrent instability (young male athletes in contact sports), initial Bankart repair is recommended 3, 4

For acute fractures involving >15-20% of the inferior glenoid diameter:

  • Bony fixation is mandatory to prevent recurrent instability 3
  • Arthroscopic repair remains the most common treatment method with favorable outcomes and low recurrence rates 4

For chronic bony Bankart lesions with significant bone loss:

  • Management is case-by-case based on fragment resorption and anterior glenoid erosion 3
  • Conservative therapy has high recurrence rates 3
  • When significant anterior glenoid bone loss exists, reconstruction is indicated using either anatomical approaches (iliac crest bone graft, osteoarticular allograft) or non-anatomical procedures (Latarjet, Bristow) 3

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

Never perform open posterior bone block procedures for posterior Bankart lesions, as this technique overcorrects posterior translation while failing to restore inferior stability, creating abnormal joint mechanics 1. Arthroscopic posterior Bankart repair is superior because it more precisely restores the intact joint's laxity patterns 1.

Associated Pathology

When Bankart lesions are identified, systematically evaluate for concurrent injuries that require simultaneous repair 5:

  • Hill-Sachs lesions occur in 77% of cases 2
  • Anterior glenoid rim damage occurs in 73% of cases 2
  • Type IV SLAP tears can coexist and require combined arthroscopic repair 5

References

Research

The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 1978

Research

[Bony Bankart lesions].

Der Unfallchirurg, 2014

Research

Combined arthroscopic repair of a type IV SLAP tear and Bankart lesion.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.