Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) for Anticoagulation
LMWH is the preferred anticoagulant over unfractionated heparin for both initial treatment and long-term management of venous thromboembolism, particularly in cancer patients, due to superior efficacy in reducing recurrent VTE and mortality without increased bleeding risk. 1
Initial Treatment of Acute VTE
Standard Dosing Regimens
For initial treatment of established VTE, LMWH is recommended as first-line therapy when creatinine clearance is ≥30 mL/min (Grade 1A). 1
- Enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours, or alternatively 1.5 mg/kg once daily 1, 2
- Dalteparin: 200 units/kg subcutaneously once daily (maximum 18,000 units) 3, 4
- Tinzaparin: 175 units/kg subcutaneously once daily 1
Once-daily dosing is preferred when feasible to improve patient compliance, though twice-daily enoxaparin may be required for patients with bleeding risk, moderate renal failure, or need for surgical intervention. 1
Advantages Over Unfractionated Heparin
LMWH demonstrates clear superiority to UFH for DVT treatment:
- Reduced mortality: Consistent evidence shows lower death rates with LMWH compared to UFH 1
- Lower major bleeding risk: Significantly fewer major hemorrhages during initial therapy 1, 2
- No laboratory monitoring required: Eliminates need for aPTT checks in most patients 1, 5
- Predictable pharmacokinetics: Achieves therapeutic levels quickly and consistently, unlike UFH which frequently results in subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic levels 1
- Lower risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT): Substantially reduced compared to UFH 5
Long-Term Anticoagulation (Beyond 10 Days)
Cancer Patients (Highest Quality Evidence)
For cancer-associated VTE, LMWH for at least 6 months is superior to vitamin K antagonists and is the preferred long-term therapy (Grade 1A). 1
Dalteparin dosing for cancer patients:
- Initial month: 200 units/kg subcutaneously once daily 3, 4
- Months 2-6: Reduce to 150 units/kg subcutaneously once daily 1, 3
This regimen reduces recurrent VTE by 49% compared to warfarin (8.0% vs 15.8%; HR 0.48, P=0.002) without increasing bleeding risk. 1, 3
Enoxaparin alternative for cancer patients: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours can be continued long-term, though dalteparin has the strongest evidence and is the only LMWH FDA-approved specifically for extended treatment of cancer-associated VTE. 3, 4
Non-Cancer Patients
LMWH can be used for long-term therapy in non-cancer patients as a superior alternative to warfarin, particularly for outpatient management. 6
- Enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily for extended prophylaxis demonstrates 49.4% thrombus reduction versus 24.5% with warfarin (P<0.001) 6
- Recurrent VTE rates are lower with LMWH (9.5%) compared to warfarin (23.7%, P<0.05) 6
- Bleeding complications are significantly reduced (1.1% vs 10%, P<0.05) 6
VTE Prophylaxis
Standard Prophylactic Dosing
For DVT prophylaxis in medical and surgical patients:
Surgical Patients
All patients undergoing major surgery for malignancy should receive LMWH prophylaxis starting preoperatively and continuing for at least 7-10 days. 1
Extended prophylaxis for 4 weeks postoperatively is recommended for patients undergoing major abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery with high-risk features (restricted mobility, obesity, history of VTE). 1
Sepsis and Critical Illness
LMWH is preferred over UFH for VTE prophylaxis in septic patients (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). 1
Special Populations and Dose Adjustments
Severe Renal Impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min)
Switch to unfractionated heparin rather than LMWH in severe renal impairment due to risk of drug accumulation and 2-3 fold increased bleeding risk. 1, 7
If LMWH must be used:
- Reduce enoxaparin to 30 mg subcutaneously once daily for prophylaxis 5
- Monitor anti-Xa levels 4-6 hours after dose 7
- Consider dalteparin with anti-Xa monitoring as it may be better cleared than enoxaparin 3
UFH dosing for severe renal impairment:
- Treatment: 80 units/kg IV bolus, then 18 units/kg/hour continuous infusion, adjusted to aPTT 1.5-2 times normal 7
- Prophylaxis: 5000 units subcutaneously every 8-12 hours 7
Obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m²)
For obese patients receiving enoxaparin, reduce dose to 0.8 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours for treatment. 3
Pregnancy
LMWH is the anticoagulant of choice over warfarin for both prophylaxis and treatment during pregnancy. 5
- Enoxaparin 40 mg once daily or dalteparin 5000 units once daily for antepartum prophylaxis in high-risk patients 5
Direct Oral Anticoagulants as Alternative
For cancer patients without high risk of gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding, direct oral anticoagulants (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) are now non-inferior to LMWH for initial and long-term treatment (upgraded to Grade 1A). 1
However, this requires:
- Apixaban: 10 mg twice daily for 7 days, then 5 mg twice daily 1
- Rivaroxaban: 15 mg twice daily for 21 days, then 20 mg once daily 1
- Edoxaban: Requires 5 days of LMWH first, then 60 mg once daily 1
DOACs should be avoided in severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min). 7
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use standard LMWH doses in severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min)—switch to UFH or reduce dose with anti-Xa monitoring 5, 7
- Do not assume all LMWHs are interchangeable—they differ in molecular weight, half-life, FDA indications, and evidence quality 1, 3
- Never administer LMWH intravenously—subcutaneous route only 5
- Do not use LMWH in patients with active HIT—use alternative anticoagulants 5
- Avoid DOACs in patients with high GI/GU bleeding risk—continue LMWH instead 1
Monitoring Requirements
Routine laboratory monitoring is not required for LMWH in most patients. 1, 5
Monitor in specific situations:
- Platelet counts in high-risk patients (prior HIT, therapy >7 days) to detect HIT 5
- Anti-Xa levels in severe renal impairment, extreme obesity, or pregnancy 7
- Renal function before initiating therapy and periodically during treatment 5, 7
Outpatient Treatment
Outpatient treatment of DVT with LMWH is safe and cost-effective for carefully selected patients, saving approximately $1,641 per patient compared to hospitalization. 1, 8
Appropriate candidates for outpatient treatment:
- Hemodynamically stable 1
- No significant comorbidities requiring hospitalization 1
- Adequate support services and follow-up available 1
- Reliable patient who can self-inject or has assistance 1
Most studies excluded patients with concomitant PE, though selected PE patients may be candidates if hemodynamically stable. 1