Treatment of Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer
For patients with very high-risk prostate cancer (clinical stage T3b-T4), the preferred treatment is radiation therapy combined with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 2-3 years (Category 1 recommendation). 1
Definition of Very High-Risk Disease
Very high-risk prostate cancer is defined as:
- Clinical stage T3b-T4 (locally advanced disease with fixation or invasion of adjacent structures) 1, 2
- This classification is independent of PSA level or Gleason score 3
Primary Treatment Options
First-Line: Radiation Therapy + Long-Term ADT (Preferred)
External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with long-term ADT (typically 2-3 years) is the Category 1 preferred treatment for very high-risk disease. 1
- Radiation dose should be >70 Gy using conformal techniques 1, 2
- ADT duration should be long-term (2-3 years minimum) for this risk category 1
- This combination has demonstrated survival benefit over radiation alone in randomized controlled trials 1
- ADT can be achieved through medical castration with LHRH agonists (such as goserelin 10.8 mg subcutaneously every 12 weeks) or surgical castration 4, 5
Alternative Option: EBRT + Brachytherapy
Combination of EBRT plus brachytherapy with or without long-term ADT is another primary treatment option. 1
- This approach provides dose escalation to the prostate
- The optimal duration of ADT in this setting remains unclear 1
Selected Surgical Candidates
Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) may be considered in highly selected patients with no fixation to adjacent organs. 1
- Surgery is emerging as an option in the very high-risk setting when combined with adjuvant radiation/ADT 3
- Radical prostatectomy offers potential benefits including: avoiding long-term ADT toxicity, reducing symptomatic local recurrence, enabling complete pathological staging, and potentially reducing late adverse effects like secondary malignancy 6
- However, this approach requires careful patient selection and typically necessitates multimodal therapy 6, 3
Palliative ADT Alone
ADT alone is reserved only for patients not eligible for definitive therapy due to comorbidities or limited life expectancy. 1
- ADT alone is insufficient as primary treatment for patients who are candidates for curative therapy 1
Critical Treatment Principles
What NOT to Do
- Never use ADT alone as primary treatment in patients eligible for definitive therapy - it does not improve survival compared to combined modality treatment 1, 2
- Do not use cryotherapy, HIFU, or focal therapy as standard initial treatments - insufficient long-term data 1, 2, 4
- Avoid brachytherapy monotherapy in very high-risk disease - inadequate for this risk category 1
Multimodal Approach Considerations
Growing evidence suggests neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy may be beneficial in the context of a multimodal approach for very high-risk disease. 3
- This represents an evolving area where the optimal therapy continues to be refined 3
Follow-Up After Treatment
Post-treatment monitoring should include PSA measurement every 6-12 months for the first 5 years, then annually. 1, 2
- After EBRT, PSA should reach ≤1 ng/mL within 16 months 2, 4
- First follow-up visit at 3 months should include PSA measurement, digital rectal examination, and assessment of treatment-related symptoms 2
Managing ADT Toxicity
Patients on long-term ADT require monitoring for osteoporosis and metabolic syndrome. 4
- Regular exercise should be recommended to all men on ADT to reduce fatigue and improve quality of life 4
- Patients should be informed that ADT with radiation increases adverse effects on sexual function 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Undertreatment with radiation alone - always combine with long-term ADT for very high-risk disease 1
- Insufficient ADT duration - ensure 2-3 years minimum, not the shorter 4-6 month courses used for intermediate-risk disease 1
- Inappropriate patient selection for surgery - only consider in patients without fixation to adjacent organs 1
- Failure to use pelvic lymph node dissection when performing radical prostatectomy in this population 1, 2