What are the treatment options for prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Options for Prostate Cancer

Treatment for prostate cancer should be based on risk stratification, with active surveillance for low-risk disease, while intermediate or high-risk disease requires more aggressive interventions such as radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or combination treatments. 1

Risk Classification

Prostate cancer is classified into three risk categories that guide treatment decisions:

  • Low-risk: T1-2a, Gleason <7, PSA <10 ng/ml
  • Intermediate-risk: T2b-c, Gleason 7, PSA 10-20 ng/ml
  • High-risk: T3-4, Gleason >7, PSA >20 ng/ml 1

Treatment Options by Risk Category

Low-Risk Disease

  • Active surveillance: Preferred option with close monitoring using PSA, repeat biopsies, and MRI 2
  • Radical prostatectomy: Complete surgical removal of the prostate
  • Brachytherapy: Placement of radioactive seeds directly into the prostate
  • External beam radiotherapy: Conformal techniques with minimum target dose of 74 Gy 2

Active surveillance has shown 99% disease-specific survival at 8 years for appropriately selected patients 2.

Intermediate-Risk Disease

  • Radical prostatectomy: Often with pelvic lymphadenectomy
  • External beam radiotherapy: May be combined with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
  • Brachytherapy: With or without external beam radiation
  • Active surveillance: May be appropriate for select patients 2

The Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study 4 demonstrated that radical prostatectomy improved overall survival at 12 years by 5.4% compared to watchful waiting (12.5% vs 17.9% mortality, p=0.03), with the benefit primarily seen in men ≤65 years 2.

High-Risk or Locally Advanced Disease

  • Long-term ADT + radical radiotherapy: Standard approach
  • Radical prostatectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy: For selected patients
  • Neoadjuvant ADT + radical radiotherapy + adjuvant ADT: Combination approach 2

Metastatic Disease

  • Hormone-naive metastatic disease:

    • ADT + abiraterone
    • ADT + docetaxel
    • ADT + enzalutamide
    • ADT + apalutamide
    • Radiation therapy for low-volume disease 2
  • Castration-resistant (first line):

    • Abiraterone
    • Docetaxel
    • Enzalutamide 2

Treatment-Related Considerations

Side Effects

Radical prostatectomy increases the rate of:

  • Erectile dysfunction (80% vs 45% with watchful waiting)
  • Urinary incontinence (49% vs 21% with watchful waiting) 2

These rates may vary depending on surgical expertise and technique.

Medication Specifics

  • Docetaxel: For metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, the recommended dose is 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks as a 1-hour intravenous infusion, with prednisone 5 mg orally twice daily administered continuously 3

  • Abiraterone: An androgen biosynthesis inhibitor that improves survival in metastatic prostate cancer. When added to ADT, it improved median overall survival from 36.5 months to 53.3 months compared with medical castration alone 4

Diagnostic Evaluation

Before treatment selection:

  • PSA and digital rectal examination: Initial screening tools
  • Prostate biopsy: Minimum of 8-12 cores under transrectal ultrasound guidance
  • Imaging for staging:
    • Intermediate-risk: MRI or CT (abdomen and pelvis) and bone scan
    • High-risk: CT (chest, abdomen, pelvis) and bone scan 2

Follow-up Care

After radical treatment:

  • PSA should be below detection limit within 2 months after prostatectomy
  • PSA should reach 1 ng/ml within 16 months after radiation therapy
  • First follow-up visit recommended at 3 months after radical treatment 1

Important Considerations

  1. Treatment decisions should account for life expectancy, comorbidities, and potential side effects
  2. Novel imaging techniques like PET-CT and PSMA-PET-CT have better sensitivity but have not been shown to improve clinical outcomes 2
  3. Population-based PSA screening is not recommended due to risks of overdiagnosis and overtreatment 1
  4. Approximately 75% of patients present with localized disease (5-year survival rate nearly 100%), while 10% present with metastatic disease (5-year survival rate 37%) 4

References

Guideline

Prostate Cancer Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Prostate Cancer: A Review.

JAMA, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.