Can whole exome sequencing (WES) be used for diagnosing congenital myasthenia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Whole Exome Sequencing for Congenital Myasthenia

Yes, whole exome sequencing (WES) is highly effective and recommended for diagnosing congenital myasthenia syndromes (CMS), particularly when clinical phenotype alone cannot identify the specific genetic defect. 1, 2, 3

Why WES is the Preferred Diagnostic Approach

WES has revolutionized CMS diagnosis by identifying over 30 causative genes, many of which would be missed by traditional single-gene testing. 2, 3 The technology captures all protein-coding regions of the genome, making it capable of simultaneously evaluating all relevant genes associated with these genetically heterogeneous conditions. 1

Key Advantages for CMS Diagnosis

  • Next-generation sequencing has dramatically accelerated gene discovery in CMS and enhanced diagnostic "pick up" rates beyond what was previously possible with targeted testing. 2

  • WES is more cost-effective than sequential single-gene testing when multiple genetic loci could explain the clinical syndrome, which is precisely the case with CMS. 1

  • The technology detects various mutation types including single-nucleotide variants, small insertions/deletions, and copy number variants in CMS-associated genes. 1

Clinical Context and Genetic Heterogeneity

CMS encompasses a diverse group of genetic disorders affecting neuromuscular transmission, with mutations now identified in over 30 different genes. 2, 3 These include:

  • Genes encoding neuromuscular junction-specific proteins (acetylcholine receptor subunits, acetylcholinesterase) 3
  • Ubiquitously expressed genes affecting protein glycosylation (ALG2, ALG14, DPAGT1) 4
  • Genes involved in endplate development and maintenance (LRP4, MuSK, DOK7) 5, 6
  • Presynaptic proteins and synaptic basal lamina components 3

Without phenotypic clues pointing to a specific gene, exome sequencing is the most useful technique for identifying the disease gene. 3

Critical Implementation Requirements

Laboratory Standards

WES must be performed in a CLIA/CAP-certified laboratory with review by qualified clinical molecular geneticists to ensure accurate interpretation. 1

Validation Protocol

All relevant genetic variants identified by WES should be confirmed using Sanger sequencing before making clinical treatment decisions. 1

Technical Considerations

  • Sequencing depth and coverage of genes of interest significantly influence diagnostic yield—higher depth provides more reliable findings. 1
  • Multiple variant calling tools and rigorous filtering should be used to remove false positives and improve accuracy. 1

Important Limitations to Recognize

WES may identify variants of uncertain significance (VUS), creating interpretation challenges that require expert clinical correlation. 1

Complex structural variants or mutations in non-coding regulatory regions will not be detected by WES and may require whole genome sequencing. 1

Chromosomal abnormalities are routinely missed by WES, so if clinical features suggest chromosomal involvement, array comparative genomic hybridization should be performed first. 7

Why Genetic Diagnosis Matters for CMS

Accurate genetic diagnosis is paramount because the same drug can be effective, ineffective, or even harmful in different CMS subtypes. 5, 3

Treatment Implications Based on Genetic Subtype

  • Pyridostigmine (cholinesterase inhibitor) should be avoided in DOK7, acetylcholinesterase deficiency, and slow-channel CMS. 5

  • Beta-adrenergic agonists are first-line for DOK7 and acetylcholinesterase deficiency CMS. 5

  • Long-lived open-channel blockers are indicated specifically for slow-channel CMS. 5

Without genetic confirmation, empiric treatment risks worsening the patient's condition. 5, 3

Optimal Diagnostic Strategy

Combine WES with proper clinical phenotyping and family history to guide interpretation of genetic findings and maximize diagnostic yield. 1 Look specifically for:

  • Fatigable muscle weakness patterns (limb-girdle versus ocular versus generalized) 4, 3
  • Age of symptom onset 2
  • Response to previous cholinergic medications 5
  • Presence of multisystem involvement suggesting glycosylation defects 4
  • Family history consistent with autosomal recessive inheritance 4

The prevalence of CMS is estimated at 9.2 cases per million in the UK, but this is likely an underestimate given improved detection with next-generation sequencing. 2

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.