What is pemphigus, including its disease type and pathology?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pemphigus: Disease Overview and Pathology

Pemphigus is a group of potentially life-threatening autoimmune blistering diseases characterized by IgG autoantibodies targeting desmosomal proteins (primarily desmoglein 1 and 3), resulting in intraepidermal acantholysis that manifests clinically as flaccid blisters and erosions of the skin and mucous membranes. 1, 2

Disease Classification and Subtypes

Pemphigus encompasses several distinct clinical variants, each with unique characteristics:

Major Subtypes

  • Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV): The most common variant, characterized by IgG antibodies directed against desmoglein 3 (Dsg3), with approximately 50-60% of patients also having Dsg1 autoantibodies 1, 3, 2

    • Oral mucosa is the first site of involvement in the majority of cases, with disease potentially remaining confined to mucosal surfaces or extending to involve skin (average lag period 4 months) 1
    • Presents with suprabasal acantholysis and blister formation histologically 1
    • Peak frequency occurs in the third to sixth decades of life 1
  • Pemphigus Foliaceus (PF): Characterized by autoantibodies against desmoglein 1 (Dsg1) 2

    • More superficial blistering pattern compared to PV 4
  • Paraneoplastic Pemphigus: Associated with underlying malignancies 4, 5, 2

  • Pemphigus Herpetiformis: An atypical variant with distinct clinical presentation 4, 5

  • IgA Pemphigus: Characterized by IgA rather than IgG autoantibodies 4, 5

Pathophysiology

Autoimmune Mechanism

  • The disease results from an autoimmune process where IgG antibodies target keratinocyte desmosomal cadherins, interfering with the adhesive function of these molecules 6
  • This antibody-antigen interaction leads to separation of keratinocytes (acantholysis) and clinical manifestation of blistering 6
  • The sites of blister formation can be physiologically explained by the anti-desmoglein autoantibody profile and tissue-specific expression pattern of desmoglein isoforms 2

Histological Features

  • Intraepidermal cleavage is the hallmark histological finding, distinguishing pemphigus from subepidermal blistering diseases like bullous pemphigoid 4
  • Suprabasal acantholysis and blister formation are highly suggestive of PV 1
  • Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) shows characteristic deposition of IgG in the intercellular spaces of the epidermis 1

Genetic Factors

  • There is a fairly strong genetic background with linkage to HLA class II alleles 3
  • Certain ethnic groups are especially susceptible, including Ashkenazi Jews and those of Mediterranean and Indian origin 3

Clinical Presentation

Pemphigus Vulgaris Specific Features

  • Oral erosions occur in almost all cases, with the oral mucosa being the first site of involvement in the majority 1
  • Cutaneous lesions present as flaccid blisters that readily rupture, with new bullae developing as older ones rupture and ulcerate 3, 6
  • Oral lesions consist of small blisters or erosions found mainly on the palatal mucosa 1

Disease Severity Stratification

  • Studies differentiating by clinical phenotype show lower mortality in patients with predominantly mucosal PV (1-17%) compared to those with mucocutaneous PV (34-42%) 1

Diagnostic Criteria

Diagnosis requires three independent groups of criteria 6:

  1. Clinical features: Flaccid blisters and erosions on skin and oral mucosa
  2. Histologic findings: Epidermal acantholysis
  3. Immunological tests: Circulating and skin-fixed antibodies against keratinocyte surface antigens

Laboratory Confirmation

  • Direct Immunofluorescence (DIF): Perilesional, intact skin or clinically uninvolved tissue shows IgG deposition in intercellular spaces 1

    • Sensitivity of DIF is 89% in oral biopsies compared with 85% for indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) 1
  • Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF): Demonstrates circulating IgG binding in a linear pattern at the basement membrane 1

  • ELISA Testing: Direct measurement of Dsg1 and Dsg3 antibodies in serum, offering advantages over IIF and potentially superseding this technique 1

Epidemiology and Prognosis

Historical Context and Mortality

  • Before the introduction of corticosteroids in the early 1950s, the mortality of PV was approximately 75% on average, mainly from dehydration or secondary systemic infections 1, 3
  • The prognosis, mortality, and clinical outcomes in pemphigus have undergone dramatic change throughout the years with modern immunosuppressive therapy 4

Disease Burden

  • Pemphigus is a rare disease with considerable variation in epidemiological features across different regions of the world 4
  • The disease has a chronic course leading to high morbidity and mortality 4
  • Observational studies examining comorbidities and associations among patients with pemphigus are scarce and sometimes inconclusive 4

Pathophysiological Roles of Immune Cells

  • The pathophysiological roles of T cells and B cells have been characterized in mouse models of pemphigus and patients, revealing insights into the mechanisms of autoimmunity 2
  • This understanding has led to the development of targeted therapies, particularly rituximab (anti-CD20+ B cell therapy), which is a promising therapeutic option that may soon become first-line therapy 2

Key Clinical Pitfalls

  • Delayed diagnosis: Oral lesions may precede cutaneous involvement by months, and pemphigus may be misdiagnosed as other oral conditions 1
  • Incomplete diagnostic workup: All three diagnostic criteria (clinical, histological, and immunological) should be confirmed; relying on clinical features alone can lead to misdiagnosis 6
  • Distinguishing from bullous pemphigoid: The level of cleavage (intraepidermal in pemphigus vs. subepidermal in bullous pemphigoid) is critical for correct diagnosis and treatment planning 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Pemphigus.

Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2017

Research

Number II. Pemphigus vulgaris.

Oral diseases, 2005

Research

The new pemphigus variants.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1999

Research

Pemphigus.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.