Treatment of Prostate Cancer by Stage
Treatment selection for prostate cancer depends primarily on risk stratification (very low, low, intermediate, high, and very high/locally advanced) combined with life expectancy, with active surveillance preferred for low-risk disease, radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for intermediate-risk disease, and radiation therapy plus long-term androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk and locally advanced disease. 1
Risk Stratification Framework
Risk stratification is essential before selecting treatment, as it determines prognosis and guides therapeutic decisions 2:
- Very low risk: Gleason score ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL, <3 positive biopsy cores, ≤50% cancer in any core, PSA density <0.15 ng/mL/g 3
- Low risk: Gleason score ≤6 and PSA <10 ng/mL 2, 3
- Intermediate risk: Gleason score 7, or PSA 10-20 ng/mL 1, 3
- High risk: Gleason score 8-10, or PSA >20 ng/mL 1, 3
- Very high risk/locally advanced: Clinical stage T3b-T4 1, 3
Staging Workup Requirements
For intermediate and high-risk disease, obtain cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI of abdomen and pelvis) and bone scan to evaluate for metastases before treatment decisions. 1, 2
Treatment by Risk Category
Very Low and Low Risk Disease
For patients with life expectancy <10 years, observation (watchful waiting) is recommended, involving monitoring without immediate curative intent, with delayed hormone therapy only if symptomatic progression occurs. 2, 3
For patients with life expectancy ≥10 years, active surveillance is the preferred option, which includes 2:
- PSA measurement every 6 months 1, 2
- Digital rectal examination every 12 months 1, 2
- Repeat prostate biopsy every 12 months 1, 2
- Intervention triggered by Gleason score progression or increased tumor volume 1
Alternative curative options for low-risk disease include 1:
A critical caveat: Despite low-risk classification, approximately 20% of patients who choose observation may die from prostate cancer over 20 years, though prostate cancer-specific mortality at 10 years remains only 2.4%. 1
Intermediate Risk Disease
For intermediate-risk disease, radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are the standard treatment options. 1
Treatment options stratified by favorable vs. unfavorable intermediate risk 1:
Favorable intermediate risk (single intermediate-risk factor):
- Radical prostatectomy 1
- Radiation therapy alone (though evidence is less robust than RT + ADT) 1
- Brachytherapy 1
- Active surveillance may be offered to select patients, though this carries higher risk of developing metastases compared to definitive treatment 1
Unfavorable intermediate risk (multiple intermediate-risk factors):
- Radical prostatectomy 1
- Radiation therapy (70-78 Gy) plus 4-6 months of ADT (preferred based on survival benefit demonstrated in randomized trials) 1
- EBRT plus brachytherapy boost 1
Key evidence: Two randomized trials (RTOG 9408 and D'Amico trial) demonstrated 10-year overall survival improvement with ADT added to radiation therapy (54% to 61%, p=0.03), though these used lower radiation doses than current standards. 1
High Risk Disease
For high-risk localized disease, long-term ADT (2-3 years) plus radical radiation therapy is the preferred treatment based on survival benefit demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. 1
Standard treatment options 1:
- Radiation therapy (minimum 78 Gy) plus 2-3 years of ADT (Category 1 recommendation) 1
- EBRT plus brachytherapy boost with or without 2-3 years of ADT 1
- Radical prostatectomy plus pelvic lymph node dissection (for select patients) 1
Critical point: Radical prostatectomy compared to watchful waiting reduces prostate cancer-specific mortality (20.4% vs 31.6% at 29 years) and overall mortality, though this data comes from pre-PSA screening era patients. 1
Very High Risk/Locally Advanced Disease (T3b-T4)
For locally advanced disease, neoadjuvant ADT plus radical radiation therapy plus adjuvant ADT is the standard approach. 1
Treatment options 1:
- Radiation therapy plus long-term ADT (Category 1 recommendation) 1
- EBRT plus brachytherapy with or without long-term ADT 1
- Radical prostatectomy plus pelvic lymph node dissection (only for selected patients with no fixation to adjacent organs) 1
- Neoadjuvant docetaxel may be considered 1
Metastatic Disease
Hormone-Naïve Metastatic Disease
For metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer, ADT combined with novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide) is the standard first-line treatment. 1, 2
Treatment options 1:
- ADT plus abiraterone (improved median overall survival from 36.5 to 53.3 months, HR 0.66) 1, 5
- ADT plus enzalutamide 1
- ADT plus apalutamide 1
- ADT plus darolutamide 1
- ADT plus docetaxel (for patients fit enough for chemotherapy) 1, 2
- Radiation therapy for low-volume disease 1
- ADT alone only for frail patients who cannot tolerate combination therapy 1
- Bone health agents 1
Castration-Resistant Metastatic Disease
First-line options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer 1:
- Abiraterone 1
- Docetaxel 1
- Enzalutamide 1
- Radium-223 (only for patients unfit for above treatments with bone-only metastases) 1
Second-line or post-docetaxel options 1:
Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant (M0 CRPC)
For high-risk M0 CRPC, add second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors to ongoing ADT 1:
Post-Treatment Surveillance
After radical prostatectomy, PSA should be undetectable (<0.2 ng/mL) within 2 months 2, 3:
- Measure PSA every 6-12 months for first 5 years, then annually 1
- PSA every 3 months may be required for high-risk patients 1
- Digital rectal examination is optional if PSA remains undetectable 2
After external beam radiation therapy, PSA should reach ≤1.0 ng/mL within 16 months 3:
- Follow same PSA monitoring schedule as post-prostatectomy 1
For biochemical recurrence (rising PSA), salvage radiation therapy to the prostate bed should be initiated early (PSA <0.5 ng/mL) for improved outcomes. 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Common errors that compromise outcomes 2, 3:
- Using cryotherapy, HIFU, or focal therapy as standard initial treatments for localized prostate cancer (these are not standard care options due to lack of comparative outcome evidence) 1, 2, 3
- Prescribing primary ADT alone for localized prostate cancer (does not improve survival) 3
- Offering brachytherapy to patients with obstructive urinary symptoms (can exacerbate symptoms) 2, 3
- Denying radical local treatment solely because metastatic lesions are identified on novel imaging techniques like PSMA-PET in patients with localized disease on routine imaging 1
Shared Decision-Making Considerations
Patients must be counseled about treatment-related adverse effects 1:
- Radical prostatectomy: Higher rates of urinary incontinence (49% vs 21%) and erectile dysfunction (80% vs 45%) compared to observation 1, 4
- Radiation therapy: Bowel dysfunction and sexual dysfunction 1
- ADT: Osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, fatigue (recommend regular exercise to all men on ADT) 2
- Older men experience higher rates of permanent erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence after prostatectomy 3
Patients should consult with both a urologist and radiation oncologist before making treatment decisions for localized disease. 1