What are the differences between Vraylar (cariprazine) and Latuda (lurasidone) in terms of efficacy and side effects?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Vraylar vs Latuda: Comparative Analysis

For bipolar depression, both Vraylar (cariprazine) and Latuda (lurasidone) are FDA-approved and effective, but Latuda demonstrates superior efficacy with a more favorable weight profile, making it the preferred first-line choice for most patients with bipolar depression. 1, 2

Efficacy Comparison

Bipolar Depression Treatment

Latuda shows stronger efficacy metrics:

  • Latuda achieved a mean MADRS improvement of -4.71 points versus placebo, compared to cariprazine's -2.29 points 2
  • Latuda had significantly greater odds of response (≥50% MADRS improvement) compared to cariprazine (OR 1.78) 2
  • The Number Needed to Treat (NNT) for response is 5 for Latuda versus 12 for cariprazine, meaning you need to treat fewer patients to achieve one additional response 2
  • Latuda demonstrated superior CGI-BP severity score improvement compared to cariprazine (-0.38 point difference) 2

Both medications are FDA-approved for bipolar depression:

  • Cariprazine is approved at 1.5 mg/day and 3.0 mg/day doses 3
  • Lurasidone has demonstrated efficacy for bipolar depression even without psychotic features 4

Other Indications

  • Both are approved for schizophrenia and acute bipolar mania 5, 6
  • Cariprazine has unique 10-fold higher affinity for dopamine D3 receptors versus D2 receptors 5

Side Effect Profiles

Weight Gain

Latuda has a clear advantage for weight-neutral treatment:

  • Latuda showed weight change similar to placebo (0.34 kg, not statistically significant) 2
  • Cariprazine caused significantly more weight gain than placebo (0.65 kg) 2
  • The American Gastroenterological Association specifically identifies lurasidone as having minimal weight gain and being among the most weight-neutral antipsychotics 7, 1

Movement-Related Side Effects

Both medications carry risk of akathisia, but with different profiles:

  • Lurasidone's risk of akathisia may exceed other modern antipsychotics 4
  • Cariprazine commonly causes akathisia, restlessness, and extrapyramidal symptoms 5, 6
  • Both show higher akathisia risk compared to placebo and some other SGAs like olanzapine 6

Metabolic Effects

  • Latuda has low risk of metabolic or cardiac abnormalities 4
  • Cariprazine showed relatively small and comparable metabolic parameter changes versus placebo 3

Common Adverse Events

Cariprazine's most common side effects (≥5% and twice placebo rate): 3

  • Nausea
  • Akathisia
  • Dizziness
  • Sedation

Latuda causes less sedation than other antipsychotics 1

Discontinuation Rates

  • Cariprazine: 6.7% discontinued due to adverse events (all doses) versus 4.8% placebo (NNH 51, not significant) 5
  • Higher doses of cariprazine (3.0 mg/day) associated with more adverse events and discontinuations than 1.5 mg/day 5

Pharmacokinetic Considerations

Cariprazine has unique long-acting properties:

  • Principal active metabolite (didesmethyl-cariprazine) has half-life of 1-3 weeks 5
  • At steady state, the metabolite is the predominant circulating compound 5
  • This creates a "built-in" long-acting effect but also means side effects may persist longer after discontinuation

Latuda has more conventional pharmacokinetics allowing for more predictable dose adjustments 4

Clinical Decision Algorithm

Choose Latuda when:

  • Weight gain is a primary concern (most patients) 1, 2
  • Maximum efficacy for bipolar depression is needed 2
  • Faster medication adjustments may be required 4

Choose Cariprazine when:

  • Patient has failed Latuda trial 1
  • Unique D3 receptor profile may benefit negative symptoms 5, 6
  • Patient tolerates akathisia well 6

Important Caveats

  • Both medications require monitoring for mood switches if combined with antidepressants 1
  • Neither should be used as antidepressant monotherapy in bipolar disorder due to risk of triggering manic episodes 1
  • Long-term efficacy data beyond acute treatment phases remains limited for both agents 4
  • Direct head-to-head trials comparing these medications have not been conducted; all comparisons are based on network meta-analysis 2

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.