Which antibiotic is effective against Pseudomonas (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 17, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Meropenem (Option D) is the Correct Answer

Meropenem possesses excellent activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and is specifically recommended as a first-line antipseudomonal carbapenem for severe infections, while the other options listed lack reliable antipseudomonal coverage. 1, 2

Why Meropenem is Effective Against Pseudomonas

  • Meropenem is a Group 2 carbapenem with documented activity against non-fermentative gram-negative bacilli including P. aeruginosa, distinguishing it from Group 1 carbapenems like ertapenem which lack this coverage 1

  • Clinical guidelines specifically recommend meropenem for P. aeruginosa infections at doses of 60-120 mg/kg/day divided in 3 doses (maximum 6g daily), with the ability to escalate to 3 × 2g in 3-hour infusions for severe cases 1, 2

  • Meropenem demonstrates superior in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa compared to imipenem, with only 4.2% resistance rates versus 12.5% for imipenem in North American isolates 3

  • The drug achieves bactericidal activity through stability against beta-lactamases and high affinity for essential penicillin-binding proteins, making it more active than imipenem against P. aeruginosa 4

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Ampicillin/Sulbactam (Option A)

  • Has no clinically relevant activity against P. aeruginosa and is not mentioned in any guidelines for antipseudomonal coverage 1

Ertapenem (Option B)

  • Ertapenem is a Group 1 carbapenem that explicitly lacks activity against P. aeruginosa and Enterococcus species, making it unsuitable for infections where Pseudomonas is a concern 1
  • Guidelines specifically warn that ertapenem is "not active against P. aeruginosa infection" and should only be used for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae 1

Ceftriaxone (Option C)

  • Ceftriaxone is a third-generation cephalosporin without antipseudomonal activity 1
  • Guidelines distinguish between non-antipseudomonal cephalosporins (like ceftriaxone) and antipseudomonal cephalosporins (like ceftazidime and cefepime) for empiric therapy decisions 1

Clinical Context for Meropenem Use

  • For severe P. aeruginosa infections, meropenem should be combined with a second antipseudomonal agent (ciprofloxacin or aminoglycoside) to prevent inadequate treatment and reduce resistance development 1

  • Meropenem ranks among the most active agents against P. aeruginosa globally, with 75.4-91% susceptibility rates depending on geographic region 5, 6

  • The drug maintains activity against many imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa strains, with 43.8% of imipenem-resistant isolates remaining susceptible to meropenem 3

Common Pitfall to Avoid

Do not confuse all carbapenems as having equivalent coverage—ertapenem specifically lacks antipseudomonal activity despite being in the same drug class as meropenem, imipenem, and doripenem 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Antibiotics Effective Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Comparison of antibacterial activities of meropenem and six other antimicrobials against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from North American studies and clinical trials.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 1997

Research

Meropenem: a microbiological overview.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1995

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.