What are the indications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Indications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

CRT is indicated for patients with heart failure on optimal medical therapy who have LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, LBBB pattern with QRS ≥150 ms, and NYHA class II-IV symptoms, as this combination demonstrates the strongest mortality and morbidity reduction. 1

Class I Indications (Strongest Evidence)

NYHA Class II-IV with LBBB

  • LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, LBBB pattern, QRS ≥150 ms, and NYHA class II, III, or ambulatory class IV symptoms on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) 1
  • This represents the most robust evidence base, with significant reductions in death and heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.58, p<0.00001) 1
  • The LBBB morphology is critical—patients with LBBB show 36% reduction in adverse events (RR: 0.64), while non-LBBB patterns show no benefit (RR: 0.97) 1

Non-LBBB Pattern (More Restrictive)

  • LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, non-LBBB pattern with QRS ≥150 ms, and NYHA class III/ambulatory class IV symptoms on GDMT 1
  • Evidence is weaker for non-LBBB patterns; benefit only demonstrated with QRS ≥150 ms in severely symptomatic patients 1

Class IIa Indications (Reasonable to Provide)

Atrial Fibrillation with High Ventricular Pacing Burden

  • LVEF ≤35% with atrial fibrillation when: 1
    • Patient requires ventricular pacing or otherwise meets CRT criteria, AND
    • AV nodal ablation or pharmacologic rate control will achieve near 100% ventricular pacing with CRT
  • This prevents right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy 1

Anticipated High Ventricular Pacing Requirement

  • LVEF ≤35% undergoing new or replacement device placement with anticipated ≥40% ventricular pacing requirement 1
  • Prevents pacing-induced cardiomyopathy from conventional right ventricular pacing 1

Class IIb Indications (May Be Considered)

Mildly Symptomatic Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

  • LVEF ≤30%, ischemic etiology, sinus rhythm, LBBB with QRS ≥150 ms, and NYHA class I symptoms on GDMT 1
  • May prevent disease progression in early-stage heart failure 1

Non-LBBB with Intermediate QRS Duration

  • LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, non-LBBB pattern with QRS 120-149 ms, and NYHA class III/ambulatory class IV on GDMT 1
  • Evidence is equivocal; benefit not reliably demonstrated in this subgroup 1

Non-LBBB with Wide QRS, Mild Symptoms

  • LVEF ≤35%, sinus rhythm, non-LBBB pattern with QRS ≥150 ms, and NYHA class II symptoms on GDMT 1

Class III: No Benefit (Do Not Provide)

Contraindications

  • NYHA class I or II symptoms with non-LBBB pattern and QRS <150 ms 1
    • No mortality or morbidity benefit demonstrated; may cause harm 1
  • Comorbidities and/or frailty limiting survival with good functional capacity to <1 year 1
    • Device implantation risks outweigh potential benefits in this population 1

Critical Prerequisites

Mandatory Requirements Before CRT Consideration

  • Optimal medical therapy for ≥3 months (or ≥40 days post-MI if applicable) 1
  • Documented LVEF ≤35% on echocardiography 1
  • Life expectancy >1 year with acceptable functional capacity 1

Key Clinical Nuances

QRS Duration Thresholds

  • QRS ≥150 ms shows clear benefit across all NYHA classes with LBBB 1
  • QRS 120-149 ms has uncertain benefit—only consider in NYHA class III-IV with LBBB pattern 1
  • QRS duration <150 ms is a risk factor for CRT non-response 1

QRS Morphology Matters More Than Previously Recognized

  • LBBB pattern is essential for Class I indications 1
  • Right bundle branch block shows no benefit (RR: 0.91, p=0.49) 1
  • Nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay shows no benefit (RR: 1.19, p=0.28) 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not implant CRT based solely on echocardiographic dyssynchrony in narrow QRS (<120 ms) patients—clinical trials have not supported this approach 1
  • Ensure adequate trial of GDMT before device implantation—premature CRT may miss opportunity for medical optimization 1
  • Non-response rate remains 30-40% even in optimal candidates; set realistic expectations 2, 3
  • In atrial fibrillation, ensure commitment to rate control or AV nodal ablation—inadequate ventricular pacing capture negates CRT benefit 1

CRT-D vs CRT-P Decision

  • NYHA class I-II patients typically receive CRT-D (defibrillator) as trials demonstrating benefit used CRT-D devices 1
  • NYHA class III-IV patients may receive CRT-P (pacing only) when ICD is not expected to provide meaningful survival benefit due to high non-sudden death risk 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Candidatos a Resincronizador Cardíaco

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.