Which contraception options, such as Nuva Ring (etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol), Mirena (levonorgestrel), Nexplanon (etonogestrel), or Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate), prevent 99 out of 100 women from getting pregnant?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Which Contraception Options Prevent 99/100 Women from Getting Pregnant?

Both Mirena (B) and Nexplanon (C) prevent 99 out of 100 women from getting pregnant, with typical use failure rates of 0.2% and 0.05% respectively, making them the most effective reversible contraceptive options available. 1

Comparative Efficacy Data

Most Effective Options (>99% Efficacy)

Nexplanon (etonogestrel implant):

  • Typical use failure rate: 0.05% (5 pregnancies per 10,000 women) 1
  • Perfect use failure rate: 0.05% 1
  • This translates to 99.95% effectiveness, preventing pregnancy in more than 99 out of 100 women 1

Mirena (levonorgestrel IUD):

  • Typical use failure rate: 0.2% (20 pregnancies per 10,000 women) 1
  • Perfect use failure rate: 0.2% 1
  • This translates to 99.8% effectiveness, preventing pregnancy in more than 99 out of 100 women 1

Less Effective Options (<99% Efficacy)

Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone acetate injection):

  • Typical use failure rate: 3-6% 1
  • Perfect use failure rate: 0.2-0.3% 1
  • This translates to 94-97% effectiveness with typical use, meaning it prevents pregnancy in approximately 94-97 out of 100 women, not 99 out of 100 1

NuvaRing (etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring):

  • Typical use failure rate: 8-9% 1
  • Perfect use failure rate: 0.3% 1
  • This translates to 91-92% effectiveness with typical use, meaning it prevents pregnancy in approximately 91-92 out of 100 women, not 99 out of 100 1

Clinical Significance of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC)

Both Nexplanon and Mirena are classified as LARC methods, which are the most effective reversible contraceptive options because their efficacy does not depend on user adherence. 1 The American Academy of Pediatrics specifically recommends counseling patients about LARC methods first when discussing contraceptive options, ordered from most to least effective. 1

Key Advantages of LARC Methods:

  • Typical use and perfect use failure rates are nearly identical because they don't require daily adherence 1
  • Extended duration of protection (3 years for Nexplanon, 5-8 years for Mirena) 1, 2, 3
  • Rapid return to fertility after removal 1, 3
  • Higher continuation rates at 1 year (80-84%) compared to other methods 1

Important Clinical Caveats

The distinction between typical use and perfect use is critical for patient counseling. 1 While Depo-Provera has a perfect use failure rate of 0.2-0.3% (similar to Mirena), its typical use failure rate is significantly higher at 3-6% because it requires injections every 12-13 weeks. 1, 4 Missing or delaying injections substantially reduces efficacy. 4

NuvaRing similarly shows a large gap between perfect use (0.3%) and typical use (8-9%) failure rates because it requires correct insertion, timely replacement every 3 weeks, and proper storage. 1, 5 User error significantly impacts its real-world effectiveness. 5

Recent research demonstrates that both Nexplanon and Mirena maintain their high efficacy beyond their FDA-approved durations, with Nexplanon remaining effective through 5 years 2, 6 and Mirena through 8 years. 3 This extended efficacy further enhances their cost-effectiveness and reduces the need for replacement procedures. 2, 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.