What is the appropriate initial evaluation and management of a patient with back pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Examination of Patient with Back Pain

Conduct a focused history and physical examination to classify the patient into one of three categories: nonspecific low back pain (85% of cases), back pain with radiculopathy/spinal stenosis, or back pain with another specific spinal cause—this classification drives all subsequent management decisions. 1

History Components

Red Flags to Identify Immediately

Screen for serious underlying conditions that require urgent imaging or intervention 1:

  • Cancer history or current unexplained weight loss (cancer prevalence ~0.7%) 1
  • Fever or recent infection (spinal infection prevalence 0.01%) 1
  • Significant trauma (compression fracture prevalence 4%) 1
  • Severe or progressive neurologic deficits (cauda equina syndrome prevalence 0.04%) 1
  • Osteoporosis or chronic steroid use (increases fracture risk) 1
  • Age >50 years with new onset pain (higher cancer/fracture risk) 1

Neurologic Symptom Assessment

Determine if radiculopathy or spinal stenosis is present 1:

  • Radicular leg pain (radiating below the knee in dermatomal pattern) 1
  • Numbness or weakness in specific nerve distributions 1
  • Bowel/bladder dysfunction (suggests cauda equina syndrome) 1

Psychosocial Risk Factors

Assess factors predicting chronic disability 1:

  • Depression or passive coping strategies 1
  • Job dissatisfaction or disputed compensation claims 1
  • Higher baseline disability levels or somatization 1

Physical Examination Components

Neurologic Examination

Perform targeted testing based on symptom pattern 1, 2:

  • Straight leg raise test (positive if reproduces radicular pain <70 degrees) 2
  • Motor strength testing (L4: ankle dorsiflexion; L5: great toe extension; S1: ankle plantarflexion) 1
  • Sensory examination (dermatomal distribution) 1
  • Reflexes (knee jerk L4, ankle jerk S1) 1

Spinal Examination

Look for specific findings 2:

  • Midline tenderness (suggests compression fracture or infection, especially with fever) 2
  • Kyphosis or postural abnormalities (osteoporosis risk) 3
  • Range of motion limitations 1

Imaging Decision Algorithm

Do NOT Image Routinely

Avoid imaging in nonspecific low back pain without red flags—routine imaging provides no clinical benefit and exposes patients to unnecessary radiation. 1

Image Immediately (MRI or CT)

Order urgent imaging when 1, 3:

  • Severe or progressive neurologic deficits present 1
  • Cauda equina syndrome suspected (saddle anesthesia, bowel/bladder dysfunction) 1
  • Cancer history with new back pain (concern for metastasis/cord compression) 3
  • Fever with back pain (concern for infection) 1

MRI is preferred over CT because it provides superior soft tissue, vertebral marrow, and spinal canal visualization without ionizing radiation 1, 3.

Consider Delayed Imaging

For patients without red flags 1, 2:

  • Plain radiography after 4-6 weeks if symptoms persist despite conservative management 1, 2
  • Plain radiography initially for suspected compression fracture in high-risk patients (osteoporosis, steroid use) 1

Alternative Screening Strategy

For patients with cancer risk factors but no neurologic deficits 1:

  • ESR measurement (≥20 mm/h has 78% sensitivity, 67% specificity for cancer) 1
  • Plain radiography first, then MRI if abnormal 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never order routine imaging for acute nonspecific low back pain—this leads to identification of incidental findings (disc abnormalities present in 29-43% of asymptomatic patients) that may trigger unnecessary interventions 1
  • Do not delay MRI when red flags are present—delayed diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome, infection, or cord compression worsens outcomes 1, 3
  • Avoid recommending bed rest—maintaining activity within pain limits improves outcomes 2
  • Do not miss psychosocial assessment—these factors strongly predict progression to chronic disabling pain 1

Reassessment Timing

Reevaluate patients with persistent unimproved symptoms after 1 month, as most acute low back pain improves substantially within the first month 1, 2. Earlier reassessment is appropriate for 1:

  • Severe pain or functional deficits
  • Older patients
  • Signs of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Emergency Department Evaluation and Management of Low Back Pain

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Severe Low Back Pain with Neurological Symptoms

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.