Is the provided information sufficient for a History of Present Illness (HPI) in a progress note for a patient with anxiety and difficulty with focus and concentration, currently prescribed Lexapro (escitalopram)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Assessment of HPI Quality for Psychiatric Progress Note

This HPI is comprehensive and well-structured, containing all essential elements for documenting a psychiatric follow-up visit for a patient with anxiety and concentration difficulties. 1, 2

Strengths of the Current HPI

Core Diagnostic Elements Present

  • Clearly documents current symptom severity with quantified anxiety rating (6-7/10) and specific functional impairment (the dissociative episode where he forgot his dog's name), which are critical for assessing treatment response 1
  • Medication adherence is explicitly addressed, noting inconsistent Lexapro use with recent improvement—this is essential information that directly impacts treatment planning 1
  • Temporal progression is well-documented, describing the acute episode last Thursday with clear precipitating stressor (meeting former boss), which helps differentiate between generalized anxiety and situational anxiety 1

Psychosocial Context and Risk Factors

  • Identifies multiple pertinent stressors: intrusive thoughts about former romantic interest, marital difficulties, parents relocating, couples therapy interruption 1
  • Documents both positive and negative changes in relationship functioning (improved engagement with wife, Christmas tree activity) alongside persistent preoccupation with affair partner 1
  • Therapy engagement is tracked, noting four sessions with Dr. Stevens and patient's assessment of therapeutic alliance 1

Safety and Differential Diagnosis

  • Appropriately screens for high-risk symptoms, explicitly documenting absence of suicidal/homicidal ideation, substance abuse, psychosis, mania, and depressed mood 1, 3
  • Addresses concentration difficulties with developmental context (childhood history of being "very talkative"), which is relevant for potential ADHD comorbidity consideration 1
  • Documents vegetative symptoms (sleep and appetite stable), which helps rule out major depressive disorder 1

Minor Areas for Enhancement

Functional Impairment Quantification

  • While the HPI mentions difficulty with focus requiring written reminders, more specific documentation of occupational or social impairment would strengthen the assessment 1
  • Consider adding: "Reports needing to write down all work tasks to complete them; estimates this affects productivity by [specific amount if quantifiable]" 1

Anxiety Symptom Characterization

  • The HPI describes feeling "antsy" and rates anxiety 6-7/10, but could benefit from documenting specific GAD criteria symptoms (restlessness, fatigue, concentration problems, irritability, muscle tension, sleep disturbance) 1, 4
  • The dissociative episode ("completely out of it") warrants clarification about whether this represents severe anxiety, dissociation, or panic-like symptoms 1

Treatment Response Documentation

  • Consider explicitly stating duration of current Lexapro dose and any previous dose adjustments to inform whether adequate trial has occurred 4
  • Document whether the 6-7/10 anxiety represents improvement, worsening, or stability compared to previous visits 1

Clinical Documentation Standards Met

This HPI successfully captures the narrative arc of the patient's illness 1, 5, including:

  • Chief concern and reason for visit (routine follow-up) 1
  • Chronological symptom progression with specific examples 1, 6
  • Treatment adherence and response 1
  • Psychosocial stressors and supports 1
  • Pertinent positives and negatives for differential diagnosis 1

The level of detail is appropriate for a psychiatric progress note, providing sufficient information for clinical decision-making about medication management, therapy recommendations, and safety planning 2, 7. The HPI would support billing for a moderate to high complexity visit given the multiple comorbid issues and medication management 1.

Recommendation for Documentation

This HPI is suitable for use in the progress note with only minor additions recommended. Consider adding one sentence quantifying functional impairment at work/home and one sentence listing which specific GAD symptoms are present beyond general "antsy" feeling to fully meet diagnostic documentation standards 1, 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.