What are the possible causes of sudden groin pain and swelling in an athlete, and what are the management options for a 2 cm pubic umbilical hernia (PUH)?

Sudden Groin Pain and Swelling in an Athlete

The most likely cause of sudden groin pain and swelling in an athlete is an inguinal hematoma (Option B), resulting from acute muscle-tendon injury, typically involving the adductor musculature or rectus abdominis at their pubic attachments. 1, 2

Differential Diagnosis Analysis

Most Likely: Inguinal Hematoma

• Acute adductor strains are the most common groin injuries in athletes, particularly in sports requiring kicking, cutting, and sudden directional changes 1, 2
• These injuries typically occur at the musculotendinous junction adjacent to the pubic attachment, causing immediate pain and swelling from bleeding into the soft tissues 2
• The sudden onset with swelling strongly suggests acute hemorrhage into the groin soft tissues rather than chronic pathology 1

Less Likely Options

Rupture of Inferior Epigastric Artery (Option A):

• This is an extremely rare vascular emergency that would present with more severe symptoms including hemodynamic instability 3
• While it can occur with trauma, it is not the typical presentation for athletic groin injuries 3

Inguinal Hernia (Options C & D):

• Sports hernias (posterior inguinal wall weakness) typically present with insidious, chronic groin pain rather than sudden onset 2, 4
• Pain characteristically increases with Valsalva maneuvers and is associated with tenderness along the posterior inguinal wall 2
• Sudden swelling is not typical of sports hernias, which represent weakness rather than acute tissue disruption 2, 4
• True hernias would show a palpable bulge that increases with straining, not acute swelling from hemorrhage 2

Critical Diagnostic Approach

Immediate Red Flag Exclusion

• Rule out stress fractures (femoral neck, pubic ramus) which present with inability to bear weight and focal bone tenderness 3, 5
• Exclude vascular emergencies if there are signs of hemodynamic compromise 3

Physical Examination Findings

• Localized tenderness over the adductor origin or rectus abdominis insertion at the pubis 1, 2
• Palpable swelling and ecchymosis in the groin region 1
• Pain with resisted hip adduction or resisted sit-up maneuvers 1, 2
• Absence of palpable hernia defect or impulse with Valsalva 2

Imaging Strategy

• Ultrasound is the first-line imaging for superficial soft tissue structures and can identify hematoma 3
• MRI if diagnosis remains unclear or to assess extent of muscle-tendon injury 1

---

Management of 2 cm Umbilical Hernia

For a 2 cm umbilical hernia defect, mesh repair (Option D) is the definitive recommendation, as mesh has been proven to significantly decrease recurrence rates even in small hernias. 6

Evidence-Based Repair Strategy

Mesh Repair is Superior

• Mesh should be used for umbilical hernia repair because it decreases recurrence rates, even in small hernias 6
• This applies to defects of all sizes, including the 2 cm defect described 6
• Both open and laparoscopic approaches with mesh are acceptable, with choice depending on surgeon expertise and patient factors 6

Why Other Options Are Inferior

Primary/Local Tissue Repair (Options A & B):

• Suture-only repairs have high recurrence risk, particularly in patients with risk factors like obesity, chronic cough, or future pregnancy 6, 7
• Primary repair without mesh is associated with significantly higher recurrence rates compared to mesh repair 6
• In pregnant women or those planning pregnancy, suture-alone repair carries especially high recurrence risk during subsequent pregnancies 7

Laparoscopic Repair (Option C):

• This describes the approach (laparoscopic vs. open) rather than the repair technique 6
• Laparoscopic repair should still utilize mesh for optimal outcomes 6
• The question asks about repair technique, not surgical approach 6

Surgical Algorithm for 2 cm Defect

Repair Technique

• Use mesh reinforcement regardless of open or laparoscopic approach 6
• Mesh can be placed in various positions (onlay, sublay, intraperitoneal) depending on approach 6

Approach Selection

• Open mesh repair: Suitable for most patients, straightforward technique 6
• Laparoscopic mesh repair: Advantages include reduced wound complications and potentially faster recovery, but requires appropriate expertise 6
• Robotic mesh repair: Option in centers with robotic capability, though no clear superiority over laparoscopic 6

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

• Do not perform primary suture repair for a 2 cm defect - the recurrence rate is unacceptably high compared to mesh repair, and this represents substandard care given current evidence 6
• Mesh use is indicated even for "small" hernias to optimize long-term outcomes 6