What is the risk of recurrence in resected breast cancer patients who do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Recurrence Without Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Breast Cancer

The risk of recurrence without adjuvant chemotherapy in resected breast cancer varies dramatically based on tumor biology, ranging from less than 5% at 9 years in low-risk hormone receptor-positive disease to approximately 30% in high-risk or triple-negative disease, making risk stratification essential for treatment decisions. 1

Risk Stratification by Tumor Subtype

HR-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Negative Disease

Low-Risk Features (Oncotype DX RS 0-10):

  • Distant recurrence risk is less than 5% at 9 years with endocrine therapy alone, and these patients derive no incremental benefit from adding chemotherapy. 1
  • In women ≤50 years with low clinical risk and RS 0-10, the 9-year distant recurrence rate is ≤1.8% with endocrine therapy alone. 2
  • Very small (T1a-T1b), low-grade, lymph node-negative tumors have similarly low recurrence risk with endocrine therapy alone. 1

Intermediate-Risk Features (Oncotype DX RS 11-25):

  • The TAILORx trial demonstrated similar 9-year disease-free survival with endocrine therapy alone versus chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women. 1
  • However, women ≤50 years with RS 16-25 had a 9-year distant recurrence rate of 12.3% with endocrine therapy alone versus lower rates with added chemotherapy. 1, 2
  • Women ≤50 years with intermediate RS and low clinical risk had only 4.7% distant recurrence at 9 years with endocrine therapy alone. 2

High-Risk Features (Oncotype DX RS ≥31):

  • These patients have significantly higher distant recurrence risk and demonstrate clear benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. 1
  • Even with chemoendocrine therapy, women ≤50 years with high RS had 15.2% distant recurrence at 9 years. 2

HR-Positive, HER2-Negative, Node-Positive Disease (1-3 Nodes)

Low Recurrence Score:

  • Patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes and RS ≤11 had 5-year disease-free survival of 94.4% with endocrine therapy alone. 1
  • With RS <18, the 5-year distant recurrence risk was only 2.7% with endocrine therapy alone, suggesting the absolute chemotherapy benefit is very small. 1
  • In the MINDACT trial, patients with 1-3 positive nodes, high clinical risk but low genomic risk (70-gene assay) had 95.6% 5-year survival without distant metastasis when treated with endocrine therapy alone. 1

High Recurrence Score (≥31):

  • Clear benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy exists in node-positive disease with high RS. 1

Alternative Genomic Assays

70-Gene Assay (MammaPrint):

  • Node-negative patients with low genomic risk had 5.0% distant recurrence risk. 1
  • Patients with 1-3 positive nodes and low genomic risk had 95.6% 5-year survival without distant metastasis on endocrine therapy alone. 1

50-Gene Assay (PAM50):

  • Node-negative tumors with low risk of recurrence score had 5.0% distant recurrence risk. 1
  • Patients with 1-3 positive nodes and low ROR score had less than 3.5% distant recurrence at 10 years with endocrine therapy alone. 1

12-Gene Assay (EndoPredict):

  • HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative disease with low-risk score had 4% distant recurrence at 10 years. 1

Risk Patterns Over Time

ER-Negative Tumors:

  • Show a large early hazard peak followed by rapid decrease in recurrence risk. 3
  • After approximately 48 months, the recurrence hazard becomes lower than ER-positive tumors. 3

ER-Positive Tumors:

  • Demonstrate smaller but more persistent recurrence hazard over time. 3
  • After approximately 48 months, the ER-positive hazard exceeds that of ER-negative patients, indicating ongoing late recurrence risk. 3
  • Even with tamoxifen, ER-positive patients have greater recurrence hazard beyond 5 years compared to chemotherapy-treated ER-negative patients. 3

General Recurrence Statistics

  • Approximately 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer develop recurrent disease despite appropriate treatment. 4
  • The 5-year survival rate for metastatic breast cancer is 20%, with median survival of 12-24 months once metastatic disease develops. 4

Critical Decision-Making Factors

When Chemotherapy Benefit is Minimal:

  • T1a-T1b, node-negative, low-grade tumors with HR-positivity. 1
  • Any T size with node-negative, HR-positive, HER2-negative disease and low genomic risk score (regardless of specific assay used). 1
  • Limited nodal disease (1-3 nodes) with low recurrence score. 1

When Chemotherapy Should Be Strongly Considered:

  • Four or more positive lymph nodes (regardless of hormone receptor status). 1, 5
  • High recurrence score (≥31) in HR-positive disease. 1
  • Triple-negative or HER2-positive disease (not addressed in detail in provided evidence but implied by treatment algorithms). 1
  • Young age (≤50 years) with intermediate RS (16-25) and high clinical risk features. 1, 2

Important Clinical Pitfalls

  • Do not assume all HR-positive patients need chemotherapy—the incremental benefit in low-risk disease is relatively small and must be weighed against toxicity. 1
  • Clinical risk stratification (tumor size, grade, lymphovascular invasion) provides additional prognostic information beyond genomic assays, particularly in younger women. 2
  • The Oncotype DX 21-gene assay is the only multigene assay clinically validated for predicting chemotherapy benefit, though other assays are prognostic. 1
  • Patients with discordant clinical and genomic risk assessments require careful individualized assessment, particularly those with high clinical risk but low genomic risk. 1
  • Long-term side effects of chemotherapy (premature menopause, weight gain, memory loss, fatigue, cardiotoxicity) must be considered when absolute benefit is small. 6, 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.