Role of Plasma Exchange in ANCA Vasculitis
Plasma exchange should NOT be routinely used in ANCA vasculitis, but reserve it for patients at moderate-high to high risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), specifically those with serum creatinine ≥500 μmol/L or requiring dialysis. 1
Risk-Stratified Approach to Plasma Exchange
Patients with Kidney Involvement
Low to Low-Moderate Risk (Creatinine <500 μmol/L):
- Do not use plasma exchange 1
- The 2022 BMJ guideline makes a weak recommendation against PLEX in this population based on the PEXIVAS trial showing no mortality or ESKD benefit 1, 2
- Standard immunosuppression with rituximab or cyclophosphamide plus glucocorticoids is sufficient 3
Moderate-High to High Risk (Creatinine ≥500 μmol/L or dialysis-dependent):
- Consider plasma exchange as adjunctive therapy 1
- Multiple guidelines (KDIGO 2020, EULAR/ERA-EDTA 2016, BSR/BHPR 2021) support PLEX for severe renal impairment with creatinine ≥500 μmol/L 1
- ASFA 2020 provides a strong recommendation for PLEX as accepted second-line therapy in biopsy-proven rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis with creatinine ≥500 μmol/L 1
- The benefit is greatest when there is potential for renal recovery, particularly in patients who are oliguric 1
Patients with Pulmonary Hemorrhage WITHOUT Renal Involvement
Do not use plasma exchange 1
- The 2022 BMJ guideline makes a weak recommendation against PLEX for isolated pulmonary hemorrhage without kidney disease 1
- This represents a shift from older guidelines that favored PLEX for this indication 1
Patients with Pulmonary Hemorrhage WITH Severe Renal Involvement
Use plasma exchange 1
- When diffuse alveolar hemorrhage occurs with severe kidney disease (creatinine ≥500 μmol/L), PLEX is indicated 1
- KDIGO 2020 favors PLEX for AAV with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage plus hypoxemia 1
- ASFA 2020 considers PLEX a class I indication (accepted first-line therapy) for pulmonary hemorrhage with strong recommendation 1
Key Evidence: The PEXIVAS Trial
The landmark PEXIVAS trial (704 patients, up to 7 years follow-up) fundamentally changed practice patterns 2:
- No benefit on the primary composite outcome of death or ESKD (28.4% with PLEX vs 31.0% without; HR 0.86,95% CI 0.65-1.13, p=0.27) 2
- No effect on mortality or disease relapse 1, 2
- The trial included all patients with GFR <50 mL/min, not just those with severe disease, which diluted potential benefits in the highest-risk subgroup 4
Critical Nuances and Caveats
The PEXIVAS trial has important limitations:
- It enrolled patients with moderate kidney impairment (GFR <50 mL/min), not exclusively those with severe disease (creatinine ≥500 μmol/L) 4
- Lack of histological parameters makes it difficult to identify patients with potential for renal recovery 4
- There was a trend toward benefit in the alveolar hemorrhage subgroup, though not statistically significant 4
Observational data suggests potential benefit in specific scenarios:
- Patients with creatinine >300 μmol/L and rapidly deteriorating function may benefit 5
- Those who are dialysis-dependent at presentation may have improved renal recovery 5
- Patients double-positive for anti-GBM antibodies and ANCA should receive PLEX 5
Practical Implementation
When using plasma exchange:
- Perform 7 exchanges within 14 days of initiation 2
- Use centrifugation or filter separation with albumin and/or crystalloid replacement 1
- Exchange volume: 1-1.5 plasma volumes (40-60 mL/kg or 3.5-4 L fixed volume) 1
- Always combine with standard immunosuppression (rituximab or cyclophosphamide) plus glucocorticoids 1
Common pitfalls to avoid:
- Do not use PLEX routinely for all patients with AAV and kidney involvement 1
- Do not delay standard immunosuppression while arranging PLEX 3
- Do not use PLEX as monotherapy—it must be adjunctive to immunosuppression 1
- Do not assume PLEX prevents relapse—it has no effect on relapse rates 1, 2
Glucocorticoid Dosing Consideration
Use a reduced-dose glucocorticoid regimen (strong recommendation) 1: