What is the initial step in testing for Lyme disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Testing for Lyme Disease

The initial step in testing for Lyme disease depends critically on clinical presentation: patients with erythema migrans (EM) in endemic areas should be diagnosed clinically without laboratory testing, while all other suspected cases require two-tiered serologic testing starting with an enzyme immunoassay (EIA/ELISA) or immunofluorescence assay (IFA). 1

Clinical Diagnosis Without Testing

For patients presenting with erythema migrans (a gradually expanding annular lesion >5 cm in diameter) who live in or have recently traveled to Lyme-endemic areas (northeast and upper midwest United States), laboratory testing is not necessary and diagnosis should be made clinically. 1

  • Approximately 70-80% of Lyme disease patients present with EM 1
  • Clinical diagnosis in this scenario avoids the window period problem where antibody testing has poor sensitivity (only 30-40%) during early infection 1
  • Accompanying symptoms may include fever, lymphadenopathy, myalgias, or arthralgias 1

Two-Tiered Serologic Testing Algorithm

For all patients without EM or with suspected disseminated disease, the standard of care is two-tiered serologic testing: first-tier EIA or IFA, followed by reflex Western immunoblot only if the first test is positive or equivocal. 1

First-Tier Testing

  • Begin with an enzyme immunoassay (EIA/ELISA) or immunofluorescence assay (IFA) measuring IgM and IgG antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi. 1
  • EIA is preferred over IFA because it is more easily automated and provides quantitative values 1
  • Whole-cell sonicate preparations are most commonly used, though newer C6 peptide EIAs offer improved specificity with similar sensitivity 1
  • Only proceed to second-tier testing if the first-tier result is positive or equivocal 1

Second-Tier Testing

  • If first-tier testing is positive or equivocal, perform Western immunoblot (IgM and/or IgG depending on symptom duration). 1
  • For symptoms lasting <30 days: perform both IgM and IgG Western immunoblots 1
  • For symptoms lasting ≥30 days: perform only IgG Western immunoblot (IgM alone should not be used after 30 days due to false positives) 1
  • This two-step approach increases specificity to >98%, reducing false-positives from the first-tier test alone 1

Test Performance Characteristics

Two-tiered testing has sensitivity of 70-100% and specificity >95% for disseminated Lyme disease, but sensitivity drops to only 30-40% during early localized infection. 1

  • For early disease with EM in acute phase: sensitivity is only 40% 1
  • For early disease with EM in convalescent phase (3-4 weeks later): sensitivity improves to 61% 1
  • For disseminated disease (neuritis, carditis, arthritis): sensitivity reaches 88-100% 1
  • Specificity remains >95% across all disease stages 1

Critical Pretest Probability Considerations

Geographic exposure history is the most crucial factor determining whether to test—even highly specific tests produce false-positives when pretest probability is low. 1

  • In low-incidence states without recent travel to endemic areas, positive predictive value is only 10% 1
  • Only 0.7% of patients in non-endemic areas with arthritis, cranial neuropathies, or meningitis actually have Lyme disease 1
  • Do not order serologic testing for patients without exposure to endemic areas (northeast and upper midwest US), as positive results provide little diagnostic value 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Never order Western immunoblot without first performing EIA/IFA—this dramatically increases false-positive rates. 1

  • Alternative laboratories using unvalidated interpretation criteria show false-positive rates as high as 58% in healthy controls 1
  • Avoid urine antigen tests and CD57 tests, which lack validation 1
  • Do not retest patients after treatment—antibodies persist for months to years after successful treatment and do not indicate active infection 2
  • Persistent antibodies should not be confused with persistent infection 2
  • Clinical response, not serologic findings, should determine treatment success 2

When Convalescent Testing Is Needed

For patients with suspected early Lyme disease who test negative in the acute phase, obtain convalescent serology 3-4 weeks later. 1

  • Sensitivity improves from approximately 40% to 61% between acute and convalescent phases for EM patients 1
  • This accounts for the antibody window period during early infection 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Duration of Lyme Enzyme Immunoassay Positivity After Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.