What is the appropriate imaging order for a patient with cervical spine and lumbosacral spine/pelvis pain after a fall?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Imaging Orders for Cervical and Lumbosacral Spine After Fall

For a patient with cervical spine and lumbosacral spine/pelvis pain after a fall, order CT cervical spine without contrast AND CT thoracolumbar spine without contrast as the initial imaging studies. 1

Cervical Spine Imaging Approach

Primary Recommendation: CT Without Contrast

  • CT cervical spine without IV contrast is the gold standard for initial trauma evaluation, with sensitivity of 88.6-100% compared to plain radiographs which detect only about one-third of fractures visible on CT 1, 2
  • CT significantly outperforms radiographs in identifying cervical spine fractures and is considered the definitive imaging modality for suspected cervical spine injury 1
  • Order as: "CT cervical spine without contrast, thin-section with sagittal and coronal multiplanar reconstructions" 1, 3

When Plain Radiographs May Be Considered

  • Plain radiographs are largely supplanted by CT and should only be used if CT is unavailable 1
  • If radiographs must be obtained, order minimum three views: anteroposterior, lateral, and open-mouth odontoid 1, 4
  • However, radiographs have poor sensitivity (identifying only 36.4% of injuries) and are inadequate for ruling out cervical spine injuries in trauma patients 1, 2

Follow-Up MRI Indications

  • MRI cervical spine without contrast should be added if: 1, 2
    • Neurological deficits are present despite negative CT
    • Patient remains symptomatic with persistent neck pain after negative CT
    • Ligamentous injury is suspected (CT is inferior to MRI for soft-tissue injuries including epidural hematoma, cord contusion, and ligament sprains) 1
    • Patient is obtunded and cannot be clinically cleared 2, 4

Lumbosacral Spine/Pelvis Imaging Approach

Primary Recommendation: CT Without Contrast

  • CT thoracolumbar spine without contrast is the initial imaging of choice for suspected thoracolumbar spine injury after trauma 1
  • CT has sensitivity of 94-100% for identifying thoracolumbar spine fractures compared to radiographs with only 49-62% sensitivity for thoracic and 67-82% for lumbar fractures 1
  • Order as: "CT thoracolumbar spine without contrast" or utilize reconstructions from CT abdomen/pelvis if already obtained 1, 3

Clinical Criteria Warranting Imaging

Any patient meeting these criteria requires thoracolumbar imaging: 1

  • Midline thoracolumbar tenderness on examination
  • High-energy mechanism of injury (fall from height)
  • Age >60 years
  • Altered consciousness (GCS <15), intoxication, or distracting injury preventing adequate examination

Why Not Plain Radiographs

  • Radiographs miss 25-52% of thoracolumbar injuries compared to CT 1
  • Clinical examination alone has poor sensitivity (48-75%) for identifying thoracolumbar injuries 1
  • Plain radiographs should not be used for initial trauma screening of the thoracolumbar spine 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Screen the Entire Spine

  • Approximately 20% of spine injuries have a second noncontiguous spinal injury at another level 1, 2
  • If cervical injury is found, image the entire spine; if thoracolumbar injury is found, image the cervical spine 1

Do Not Rely on Plain Films

  • Using radiographs as initial screening misses significant injuries that CT readily detects 1, 2
  • The "three-view cervical spine series" is outdated and inadequate for trauma evaluation 1

Do Not Skip MRI When Indicated

  • Persistent neck pain despite negative CT may indicate ligamentous injury requiring MRI 1, 2
  • Less than 1% of patients will have cervical spine instability on MRI not appreciated on CT, but these injuries are clinically significant 1

Contrast Is Not Needed

  • Do not order CT with IV contrast for initial trauma evaluation—it provides no additional value and can make subtle fractures harder to detect due to contrast superimposition 1

Sample Order Format

For cervical spine:

  • "CT cervical spine without IV contrast, thin-section with multiplanar reconstructions"

For lumbosacral spine/pelvis:

  • "CT thoracolumbar spine without IV contrast" or "CT lumbar spine without IV contrast"

If neurological symptoms present or persistent pain after negative CT:

  • Add "MRI cervical spine without IV contrast" and/or "MRI lumbar spine without IV contrast"

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

CT Indications for Cervical Spine After Motor Vehicle Collision

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

ACR Appropriateness Criteria on suspected spine trauma.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR, 2007

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.