What is the management of a grade 3 liver laceration?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Grade 3 Liver Laceration

Hemodynamically stable patients with grade 3 liver lacerations should undergo non-operative management (NOM) with intensive monitoring, serial clinical and laboratory evaluation, and CT imaging to guide intervention, while hemodynamically unstable patients require immediate operative management. 1

Classification and Risk Stratification

A grade 3 liver laceration by AAST criteria involves either:

  • Subcapsular hematoma >50% surface area or expanding/ruptured subcapsular or parenchymal hematoma
  • Intraparenchymal hematoma >10 cm
  • Laceration >3 cm parenchymal depth 1

The WSES classification categorizes grade 3 injuries as WSES grade II (moderate) when hemodynamically stable, but upgrades to WSES grade IV (severe) if hemodynamically unstable, fundamentally changing management 1. Hemodynamic instability is defined as blood pressure <90 mmHg, heart rate >120 bpm, with skin vasoconstriction, altered consciousness, or shortness of breath 1.

Management Algorithm Based on Hemodynamic Status

For Hemodynamically Stable Patients (WSES Grade II)

Initial NOM is the standard of care regardless of injury grade 1, 2:

  • Obtain contrast-enhanced CT scan to define anatomic injury extent and identify associated injuries 1
  • Admit to intensive care or high-dependency unit with capability for continuous hemodynamic monitoring, serial clinical examination, and immediate access to operating room, interventional radiology, and blood products 1
  • Perform serial clinical examinations and laboratory monitoring (hemoglobin, hematocrit, coagulation parameters) every 4-6 hours initially 1, 2

If arterial blush is present on CT scan:

  • Angiography with embolization should be considered as first-line intervention to prevent delayed hemorrhage 1, 3
  • This approach is effective in 80-90% of cases but carries risk of hepatic necrosis and sepsis 3

NOM success rate for grade 3 injuries is 80-85%, with failure rates of approximately 17-47% depending on associated injuries 4, 5, 3. Failure is most commonly due to ongoing hemorrhage or development of peritonitis 1.

For Hemodynamically Unstable Patients (WSES Grade IV)

Immediate operative management is mandatory 1:

  • Proceed directly to operating room without delay for additional imaging 1
  • Apply damage control surgery principles if physiologic derangement is present (hypothermia, coagulopathy, acidosis) 6, 3

Operative Techniques for Grade 3 Injuries Requiring Surgery

When operative intervention becomes necessary, employ a systematic approach 6, 3:

  1. Manual compression and Pringle maneuver (hepatic pedicle clamping for up to 60 minutes) to achieve initial hemorrhage control 4, 6
  2. Perihepatic packing with laparotomy pads if bleeding persists—effective in 80-82% of cases 4, 6
  3. Hepatotomy with selective vessel ligation if packing fails to control hemorrhage 6
  4. Omental packing of lacerations for parenchymal defects 4
  5. Damage control with planned re-exploration in 24-48 hours if patient develops coagulopathy (71% of deaths are coagulopathy-related) 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume all grade 3 injuries can be managed non-operatively—hemodynamic status trumps anatomic grade 1, 2
  • Do not attempt NOM in facilities lacking immediate access to interventional radiology, operating room, and blood products—transfer to appropriate center is safer 1
  • Do not delay operative intervention in unstable patients for additional imaging—mortality increases with delay 1, 4
  • Monitor for delayed complications including rebleeding (peaks at 3-5 days), bile leak, hepatic abscess, and biloma formation 2, 7
  • In pediatric patients with isolated grade 3 liver injury and no physiologic instability, ICU admission may not be necessary—ward-based monitoring with close observation is often sufficient 5

Expected Outcomes

  • Mortality for grade 3 injuries is 3.7-4% when managed appropriately 6, 3
  • Overall survival with modern management approaches is 86-90% 4, 3
  • NOM success rate is 80-85% in appropriately selected patients 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Liver Injury Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Liver injury: What you need to know.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2025

Research

Liver trauma: experience in 348 cases.

World journal of surgery, 2003

Research

Pediatric liver lacerations and intensive care: evaluation of ICU triage strategies.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.