How are liver lacerations graded?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Liver Laceration Grading Systems

Liver lacerations are graded using two complementary systems: the anatomic AAST (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma) classification (Grades I-VI) and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) classification that integrates both anatomic injury and hemodynamic status.

AAST Anatomic Grading System

The AAST classification grades liver injuries from I to VI based purely on anatomical severity 1:

Grade I (Minimal)

  • Hematoma: Subcapsular <10% surface area 1
  • Laceration: Capsular tear <1 cm parenchymal depth 1

Grade II (Minor)

  • Hematoma: Subcapsular 10-50% surface area; intraparenchymal <10 cm diameter 1
  • Laceration: 1-3 cm parenchymal depth, <10 cm in length 1

Grade III (Moderate)

  • Hematoma: Subcapsular >50% surface area or expanding/ruptured subcapsular or parenchymal hematoma; intraparenchymal hematoma >10 cm 1
  • Laceration: >3 cm parenchymal depth 1

Grade IV (Severe)

  • Laceration: Parenchymal disruption involving 25-75% of hepatic lobe 1
  • Vascular: Juxtavenous hepatic injuries (retrohepatic vena cava/central major hepatic veins) 1

Grade V (Critical)

  • Laceration: Parenchymal disruption >75% of hepatic lobe 1
  • Vascular: Juxtavenous hepatic injuries 1

Grade VI (Unsurvivable)

  • Vascular: Hepatic avulsion 1

Important caveat: Multiple injuries advance the grade by one level up to Grade III 1.

WSES Classification: Integrating Hemodynamics

The WSES classification addresses a critical limitation of the AAST system by incorporating hemodynamic stability, which fundamentally changes management decisions 1:

WSES Grade I (Minor)

  • AAST Grade I-II injuries in hemodynamically stable patients (blunt or penetrating) 1

WSES Grade II (Moderate)

  • AAST Grade III injuries in hemodynamically stable patients (blunt or penetrating) 1

WSES Grade III (Severe)

  • AAST Grade IV-VI injuries in hemodynamically stable patients (blunt or penetrating) 1

WSES Grade IV (Severe/Critical)

  • Any AAST grade (I-VI) in hemodynamically unstable patients (blunt or penetrating) 1

Critical Clinical Principle

Hemodynamic status trumps anatomic grade in determining management. A "minor" AAST Grade I-II injury becomes WSES Grade IV (requiring operative management) if the patient is hemodynamically unstable, while even severe AAST Grade IV-V injuries can be managed nonoperatively if the patient remains stable 1.

Hemodynamic Instability Defined

Per ATLS criteria, instability includes 1:

  • Blood pressure <90 mmHg **and** heart rate >120 bpm
  • Evidence of skin vasoconstriction (cool, clammy skin, decreased capillary refill)
  • Altered level of consciousness
  • Shortness of breath

Management Implications by Grade

For Hemodynamically Stable Patients (WSES I-III)

  • Non-operative management should be attempted regardless of AAST grade 1, 2
  • Requires intensive monitoring with serial clinical examination, laboratory evaluation, and CT imaging 1, 2
  • Must have immediate access to interventional radiology, operating room, and blood products 1, 2

For Hemodynamically Unstable Patients (WSES IV)

  • Immediate operative management required regardless of anatomic injury grade 1
  • No additional imaging should delay surgical intervention 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never assume high-grade AAST injuries (IV-V) automatically require surgery—up to 85-90% of blunt liver injuries can be managed nonoperatively if hemodynamically stable 3, 4
  • Never attempt nonoperative management in facilities lacking immediate surgical/interventional capabilities—transfer to appropriate center instead 1, 2
  • CT grading frequently misclassifies operative injury severity—84% of CT grades did not correlate with operative findings in one study, with particular difficulty around the falciform ligament 5
  • Beware of delayed failure of nonoperative management—failure rates reach 46.7% for AAST Grade III-V injuries, with 50% mortality when Grade IV-V injuries fail 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Grade 3 Liver Laceration

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Liver injury: What you need to know.

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2025

Research

Liver trauma: experience in 348 cases.

World journal of surgery, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.