What is the role of Norursodeoxycholic acid (Nor UDCA) in treating liver fibrosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Norursodeoxycholic Acid (Nor-UDCA) for Liver Fibrosis

Norursodeoxycholic acid (nor-UDCA) has demonstrated anti-fibrotic properties in preclinical models and early human trials, but currently lacks definitive evidence for fibrosis improvement in clinical practice, with only preliminary data showing biochemical improvements in metabolic liver disease. 1

Current Evidence Status

Preclinical and Mechanistic Data

  • Nor-UDCA has shown anti-cholestatic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-fibrotic properties in preclinical models, distinguishing it from standard UDCA 1
  • The compound undergoes cholehepatic shunting due to resistance to amidation, enabling hepatic enrichment and direct therapeutic effects on both parenchymal and non-parenchymal liver cells 2
  • In animal models, nor-UDCA significantly decreased total and relative liver hydroxyproline content in rats with fibrosis reversal, demonstrating superior antifibrotic effects compared to standard UDCA 3

Human Clinical Trial Data

  • Initial results from MASH (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis) trials show improvement in ALT and liver steatosis, but no published data yet on fibrosis endpoints 1
  • A phase 2 dose-finding trial in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrated that nor-UDCA 1500 mg daily resulted in a significant 27.8% reduction in serum ALT within 12 weeks compared to placebo (p<0.0001) 4
  • The compound was safe and well tolerated in this trial, with adverse events similar to placebo 4

Comparison to Standard UDCA

Standard UDCA Fibrosis Data

  • Standard UDCA has proven efficacy in delaying fibrosis progression in primary biliary cirrhosis, with a 5-fold lower progression rate from early stage disease to extensive fibrosis (7% per year vs 34% per year with placebo, p<0.002) 5
  • However, standard UDCA has no proof of histological efficacy in MASH despite biochemical improvements 1
  • UDCA is not recommended for preventing advanced liver disease in cystic fibrosis, as studies show no difference in incidence of advanced liver disease 1

Nor-UDCA Advantages

  • Nor-UDCA demonstrated more effective antifibrotic effects than standard UDCA in animal models, particularly in fibrosis regression experiments 3
  • The compound's unique pharmacologic properties enable hepatic enrichment and direct cellular effects that counteract cholestasis, steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis 2

Clinical Application Considerations

Current Limitations

  • No large phase III trials have been completed for nor-UDCA in any liver disease with fibrosis as a primary endpoint 1
  • The existing human data is limited to biochemical markers (ALT reduction) and imaging surrogates (steatosis improvement) rather than histological fibrosis assessment 1, 4
  • The 12-week duration of the published phase 2 trial is insufficient to assess meaningful fibrosis changes 4

Ongoing Development

  • Nor-UDCA has been successfully tested in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients as its first clinical application, though fibrosis data from these trials is not yet published 2
  • Studies are ongoing to evaluate its therapeutic potential in both cholestatic and metabolic liver diseases 2

Practical Recommendation

At present, nor-UDCA cannot be recommended for treating liver fibrosis in clinical practice due to insufficient evidence from controlled trials with histological endpoints. The compound shows promise based on preclinical data and early biochemical improvements in humans, but definitive proof of anti-fibrotic efficacy requires completion of ongoing phase 3 trials with liver biopsy endpoints. 1, 2, 4

For patients with metabolic liver disease and fibrosis, focus should remain on proven interventions including weight loss, metabolic optimization, and FDA-approved therapies rather than experimental agents without established efficacy. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.