Treatment Options After FOLFIRINOX Failure in Rectal Cancer
For metastatic rectal cancer progressing after FOLFIRINOX, switch to an oxaliplatin-based regimen (FOLFOX or CAPOX) combined with bevacizumab, or consider regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil in later lines after standard therapies have been exhausted. 1
Second-Line Treatment Strategy
Primary Recommendation: Oxaliplatin-Based Regimens
- FOLFOX or CAPOX with bevacizumab is the preferred second-line option after FOLFIRINOX (which contains irinotecan) failure 1
- Bevacizumab continuation beyond progression improves overall survival (11.2 vs 9.8 months; HR 0.81, p=0.0062), making it appropriate to continue anti-angiogenic therapy even after first-line progression 1
- Aflibercept or ramucirumab combined with FOLFIRI can be used as alternatives to bevacizumab, though this represents continuing irinotecan exposure 1, 2
RAS/BRAF Status Considerations
- For RAS wild-type tumors with left-sided primary location: Consider cetuximab or panitumumab plus irinotecan (or as single agents if combination not tolerated) 1
- For RAS wild-type tumors with right-sided primary location: Prioritize bevacizumab-containing regimens over anti-EGFR therapy, as right-sided tumors respond poorly to EGFR inhibition 1
- For BRAF V600E-mutated tumors: Encorafenib plus cetuximab is the recommended option in second or third line (ESMO-MCBS score: 4) 1
Third-Line and Beyond
Standard Options After Multiple Prior Therapies
Regorafenib (160 mg daily, days 1-21 of 28-day cycles) is FDA-approved for patients previously treated with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, anti-VEGF therapy, and (if RAS wild-type) anti-EGFR therapy 1, 3
Trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m² twice daily, days 1-5 and 8-12 every 28 days) is an alternative oral agent with similar indications 1
- Combination with bevacizumab significantly prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival compared to monotherapy 1
Molecular-Directed Therapies
- HER2-amplified tumors (2-5% of colorectal cancers): Consider trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, trastuzumab plus lapatinib, or trastuzumab deruxtecan in third-line or later 1
- MSI-H/dMMR tumors: Ipilimumab-nivolumab is recommended after first-line chemotherapy failure (ESMO-MCBS score: 3) 1
Important Caveats and Pitfalls
Avoid Ineffective Agents
- Do not use capecitabine monotherapy, mitomycin, interferons, taxanes, methotrexate, pemetrexed, sunitinib, sorafenib, erlotinib, or gemcitabine as salvage therapy—these have not shown efficacy in this setting 1
Sequencing Considerations
- The order of receiving fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan does not significantly impact overall survival, but exposure to all three agents during the continuum of care correlates with improved median survival 1
- Rechallenge with anti-EGFR antibodies may be considered in selected RAS wild-type patients who initially responded, though switching between cetuximab and panitumumab after resistance is not recommended 1
Locally Advanced Disease Context
- If the question pertains to locally advanced (non-metastatic) rectal cancer that progressed during neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, the approach differs: proceed to chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery as per the PRODIGE-23 protocol 4
- The PRODIGE-23 trial demonstrated that neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy improved 3-year disease-free survival (76% vs 69%, HR 0.69, p=0.034) compared to standard chemoradiotherapy alone 4