Treatment Options for Platinum-Resistant High-Grade Serous Carcinoma
This patient has platinum-resistant disease (recurrence at 6 months) that is BRCA-negative and HRD-negative, which represents a particularly challenging clinical scenario with limited effective options; the best approach is non-platinum chemotherapy with single-agent paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan, recognizing that response rates will be poor (≤10%) and median survival approximately 4-5 months.
Disease Classification and Prognosis
This patient's recurrence at 6 months after completing platinum-based therapy defines platinum-resistant disease, which carries a significantly worse prognosis than platinum-sensitive disease 1. The absence of BRCA mutations and HRD negativity further limits therapeutic options, as this patient cannot benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy 1, 2.
- Expected response rates to subsequent chemotherapy are poor (≤10%) in platinum-resistant disease 1
- Median survival with older regimens is only 4-5 months, though newer agents may offer modest improvements 1
- The molecular profile (BRCA-negative/HRD-negative) suggests inherent resistance to DNA-damaging agents and excludes targeted maintenance strategies 2
Recommended Treatment Algorithm
First-Line Options for Platinum-Resistant Disease
Single-agent non-platinum chemotherapy is the standard approach, with the following options:
- Weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) is preferred for BRCA wild-type patients, as it demonstrated superior progression-free survival (14.3 months) compared to other doublets in platinum-sensitive relapse 3
- Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is an alternative option, though it showed inferior outcomes (11.8 months PFS) in BRCA wild-type patients compared to paclitaxel 3
- Topotecan (either oral or intravenous) can be considered, with attenuated dosing (lower than 1.5 mg/m² for 5 days) recommended to reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy 1
Critical Decision Point: Avoid Platinum Re-challenge
- Do not re-introduce carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet therapy at this time, as the 6-month recurrence interval defines platinum resistance with expected response rates ≤10% 1
- Platinum-free regimens are more appropriate for this molecular profile, particularly given potential BRCA2 amplification patterns that can confer extreme platinum resistance 4
Bevacizumab Continuation Considerations
Bevacizumab should likely be discontinued in this setting:
- The patient already received bevacizumab during primary treatment and maintenance, and disease progressed on therapy 1
- Progression on bevacizumab maintenance suggests resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy 2
- Combining bevacizumab with single-agent chemotherapy in platinum-resistant disease has limited supporting evidence 1
Monitoring and Response Assessment
- Perform CT chest/abdomen/pelvis with contrast after every 2-3 cycles to assess response 1
- Monitor complete blood counts before each cycle, with platelet count ≥100,000/mm³ and ANC ≥1,000/mm³ required for safe chemotherapy administration 5
- Consider G-CSF support for subsequent cycles if neutropenia develops 5, 6
Clinical Trial Enrollment
Strongly encourage enrollment in a clinical trial given the poor prognosis and limited standard options 1:
- Novel agents under investigation include immune checkpoint inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, Wee1 kinase inhibitors, and ATR inhibitors specifically for platinum-resistant disease 2
- Antibody-drug conjugates represent promising new approaches for chemoresistant HGSOC 2
- Clinical trials may offer access to combination strategies not available in standard practice 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Premature platinum re-challenge: Reintroducing carboplatin at 6 months will yield minimal benefit and expose the patient to unnecessary toxicity 1
- Continuing ineffective bevacizumab: Progression on bevacizumab maintenance indicates resistance; continuing it adds toxicity without benefit 2
- Overlooking supportive care: With median survival of 4-5 months, early integration of palliative care and symptom management is essential 1
- Inadequate toxicity monitoring: Single-agent chemotherapy still requires careful monitoring for myelosuppression, with dose reductions or growth factor support as needed 5, 6
Alternative Considerations
If the patient has excellent performance status and desires more aggressive therapy:
- Gemcitabine monotherapy can be considered, though it showed inferior outcomes (9.8 months PFS) compared to paclitaxel in BRCA wild-type patients 3
- Combination chemotherapy (non-platinum doublets) may be considered but will increase toxicity without clear survival benefit in this platinum-resistant, biomarker-negative population 3