What are the complications and expectations of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in cancer treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy Combinations: Complications and Expectations

When combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy in cancer treatment, expect a modest 16% increase in all-grade adverse events compared to chemotherapy alone, but importantly, no increase in treatment-related mortality, with significantly improved survival outcomes across multiple tumor types. 1

Overall Toxicity Profile

The combination of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy increases overall adverse events modestly (RR 1.16 [1.10-1.24]) compared to chemotherapy alone, but this does not translate to increased treatment-related deaths (RR 1.08 [0.88-1.32]). 1 This analysis included nearly 15,000 patients across 20 randomized controlled trials spanning lung, digestive, breast, head and neck, and cervical cancers. 1

Key Point on Mortality

  • Treatment-related death rates remain statistically similar between combination therapy and chemotherapy alone, providing reassurance about the safety of this approach despite increased toxicity. 1

Specific Complications to Anticipate

Most Significantly Increased Toxicities (All Grades)

Pneumonitis represents the most dramatically increased risk with combination therapy (RR 2.79 [2.09-3.74]), nearly tripling compared to chemotherapy alone, and is one of the most common treatment-related causes of death despite being rare overall. 1

Thyroid dysfunction more than doubles with combination therapy (RR 2.13 [1.90-2.40]), making routine thyroid monitoring essential. 1

Other significantly elevated toxicities include:

  • Rash: 56% increase (RR 1.56 [1.44-1.70]) 1
  • Creatinine elevation: 34% increase (RR 1.34 [1.21-1.48]) 1
  • Diarrhea: 19% increase (RR 1.19 [1.13-1.26]) 1
  • Dyspnea: 19% increase (RR 1.19 [1.07-1.33]) 1

Moderately Increased Toxicities

  • Peripheral neuropathy: 14% increase (RR 1.14 [1.07-1.21]) 1
  • Elevated liver enzymes: 13% increase (RR 1.13 [1.06-1.21]) 1
  • Vomiting: 12% increase (RR 1.12 [1.05-1.19]) 1
  • Neutropenia: 11% increase (RR 1.11 [1.07-1.15]) 1
  • Fatigue: 8% increase (RR 1.08 [1.04-1.13]) 1

Grade 3-4 Severe Toxicities

For severe adverse events, the most concerning increases are:

  • Dyspnea: 87% increase (RR 1.87 [1.37-2.55]) 1
  • Rash: 158% increase (RR 2.58 [1.21-5.52]) 1
  • Elevated liver enzymes: 56% increase (RR 1.56 [1.22-2.01]) 1
  • Diarrhea: 42% increase (RR 1.42 [1.09-1.87]) 1
  • Fatigue: 32% increase (RR 1.32 [1.05-1.66]) 1

Immunotherapy-Specific Complications

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) unique to or predominantly seen with immunotherapy include: 1

  • Uveitis
  • Endocrinopathies (thyroid, pituitary, adrenal)
  • Myocarditis 2
  • Pneumonitis
  • Hepatitis
  • Arthralgia
  • Enterocolitis

Critical Diagnostic Challenge

Clinical manifestations of irAEs can mimic chemotherapy toxicity, particularly for diarrhea, hepatotoxicity, skin eruptions, and fatigue, yet require completely different management approaches. 1 Currently, no biomarkers exist in routine practice to distinguish cytotoxic side effects from immune-related adverse events. 1

Mechanistic Understanding

The increased diarrhea likely results from both chemotherapy-induced and immunotherapy-induced colitis, potentially compounded by gut microbiome disturbances from both therapies. 1

The elevated dyspnea and pneumonitis risk reflects that pneumonitis is the most common serious adverse event with anti-PD-1 treatments, layered onto chemotherapy-related pulmonary toxicity. 1

Hepatotoxicity increases because both cytotoxic agents (especially taxanes, anthracyclines, 5-FU, cyclophosphamide, oxaliplatin) and immune checkpoint inhibitors independently cause liver injury, though with different microscopic patterns. 1

Clinical Expectations and Outcomes

Survival Benefits Justify Toxicity Risk

Despite increased toxicity, combination therapy demonstrates substantial survival improvements across multiple cancer types: 1

  • NSCLC (non-squamous): OS 22.0 vs 10.7 months (HR 0.56) with pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum 1
  • Triple-negative breast cancer: OS 23.0 vs 16.1 months (HR 0.73) with pembrolizumab + chemotherapy 1
  • Esophageal cancer: OS 12.4 vs 9.8 months (HR 0.73) with pembrolizumab + 5-FU + platinum 1
  • Gastric/GEJ cancer: OS 14.4 vs 11.1 months (HR 0.71) with nivolumab + chemotherapy 1

Treatment Discontinuation Rates

In neoadjuvant NSCLC treatment, 18% of patients permanently discontinued any study drug due to adverse reactions with combination therapy, with the most common reasons being acute kidney injury (1.8%), interstitial lung disease (1.8%), anemia (1.5%), neutropenia (1.5%), and pneumonia (1.3%). 2

In adjuvant NSCLC treatment with single-agent pembrolizumab, 12% discontinued due to adverse reactions, most frequently diarrhea (1.7%), interstitial lung disease (1.4%), AST elevation (1%), and musculoskeletal pain (1%). 2

Age-Related Considerations

Patients aged 75 or older experience higher discontinuation rates (29-38% depending on regimen) compared to all patients (18-23%), though overall safety profiles remain similar. 3 Serious adverse reaction rates also increase in this age group (68% vs 54% overall for nivolumab + ipilimumab in mesothelioma). 3

Comparative Safety: Immunotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone

When immunotherapy is used as monotherapy (without chemotherapy), it demonstrates superior safety compared to traditional chemotherapy: 4

  • Grade ≥3 adverse events: 16.5% with immunotherapy vs 41.09% with chemotherapy (OR 0.26) 4
  • Treatment discontinuation due to AEs: significantly lower with immunotherapy (OR 0.55) 4
  • Deaths from treatment-related AEs: lower with immunotherapy (OR 0.67) 4

Critical Management Pitfalls

The absence of additive toxicity for most adverse events suggests the mechanisms are not simply cumulative, but the hypothesis of synergistic toxic effects cannot be eliminated. 1 This means clinicians cannot predict toxicity by simply adding expected rates from each therapy independently.

Distinguishing between chemotherapy-induced toxicity and immune-related adverse events is critical because management differs fundamentally: immunotherapy toxicity typically requires immunosuppression (corticosteroids), while chemotherapy toxicity requires supportive care and dose modifications. 1, 5

Pneumonitis, though rare, demands immediate attention as it represents one of the most common treatment-related causes of death and shows the highest relative risk increase (nearly 3-fold) with combination therapy. 1

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.