MAS-825 for SJIA with Interstitial Lung Disease
MAS-825, a bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting both IL-1β and IL-18 simultaneously, represents a promising therapeutic option for SJIA-associated interstitial lung disease (SJIA-ILD), particularly given that standard IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors must be immediately discontinued in these patients due to their strong association with this life-threatening complication. 1
Critical First Step: Discontinue Standard Biologics
Immediately stop all IL-1 inhibitors (anakinra, canakinumab) and IL-6 inhibitors (tocilizumab) if SJIA-ILD is suspected or confirmed, as most affected children were treated with these agents and they are strongly associated with this complication. 1 This creates a therapeutic dilemma since these are the primary recommended agents for SJIA without lung disease. 2
Rationale for MAS-825 in SJIA-ILD
Mechanistic Advantage
Dual IL-1β and IL-18 blockade addresses the unique immunopathology of SJIA-ILD, which is characterized by markedly elevated IL-18 levels in both serum (median 27,612 pg/ml vs 5,413 pg/ml in SJIA without LD) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. 3
Patients with SJIA-ILD demonstrate up-regulated type II interferon and T cell activation networks in lung tissue, with elevated interferon-γ-induced chemokines (CXCL9 and CXCL10) in BAL fluid. 3 IL-18 is a key driver of interferon-γ production, making it a logical therapeutic target. 4
Single-agent blockade of either IL-1 or IL-6 alone is contraindicated in SJIA-ILD, necessitating alternative approaches. 1
Clinical Evidence
A case report demonstrated marked improvement in refractory SJIA-ILD with MAS-825 treatment, including reduction in total and free IL-18 in serum and BAL, improved baseline oxygen saturation, enhanced exercise tolerance, and better quality of life metrics. 4
The patient achieved complete steroid and biologic withdrawal after 10 months of MAS-825 therapy with no drug-related adverse effects. 4
BAL analysis post-treatment showed resolution of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis features and markedly reduced inflammatory infiltrates (decreased CD4 T-cells, CD8 T-cells, and macrophages). 4
Alternative Therapeutic Options When MAS-825 Unavailable
JAK Inhibitors (Preferred Alternative)
JAK inhibitors represent the next best option for SJIA-ILD given the contraindication to IL-1/IL-6 blockade and should be strongly considered. 1
These agents can address the interferon-γ-driven pathology characteristic of SJIA-ILD. 5
Glucocorticoids (Bridging Therapy)
Systemic glucocorticoids are recommended as part of initial treatment for SJIA with lung disease, though they should be used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration. 1
Plan for tapering as other disease-modifying therapies take effect. 1
Calcineurin Inhibitors (Conditional Option)
Calcineurin inhibitors are conditionally recommended, particularly if macrophage activation syndrome features coexist with lung disease. 1
These may be combined with other agents in severely ill patients. 2
Agents to Explicitly Avoid in SJIA-ILD
TNF inhibitors are inappropriate for systemic features and may worsen outcomes. 1
Abatacept is inappropriate for MAS features in SJIA-ILD. 1
Conventional synthetic DMARDs alone are ineffective for systemic features. 1
Rituximab is generally inappropriate for SJIA-ILD. 1
IVIG is inappropriate unless calcineurin inhibitor plus anakinra have failed (though anakinra itself should be avoided in established ILD). 1
Risk Factors Demanding Heightened Surveillance
Clinicians should maintain high suspicion for SJIA-ILD development in patients with:
Age <2 years at SJIA onset (OR 6.5). 3
Trisomy 21. 1
Acute digital clubbing (red flag sign demanding immediate evaluation). 2, 1
Clinical Monitoring Considerations
The interferon-driven transcriptional signature may precede histopathologic findings in lung tissue, suggesting that immunologic activation drives the pathology. 3
SJIA-ILD has distinct features from primary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, including less proteinaceous material and fewer lipid-laden macrophages in BAL (mean 10.5% vs 66.1%). 3
Caution is warranted even with apparent clinical remission on dual IL-1/IL-6 blockade, as interstitial lung disease may progress despite biochemical improvement. 6 This underscores the importance of discontinuing these agents when ILD is present.