What are the different types of Vestibular Function Testing (VFT), including Electronystagmography (ENG), Videonystagmography (VNG), Rotary Chair Test, and Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMP), used to diagnose and manage balance disorders?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Vestibular Function Testing: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide

Overview and Fundamental Principles

Vestibular function testing comprises a battery of specialized diagnostic procedures that evaluate the vestibular-ocular reflex—the neurological relationship between eye movements and the balance organs—to diagnose and characterize balance disorders when clinical diagnosis remains unclear. 1

The primary purpose of these tests is to record nystagmus (involuntary rhythmic eye movements) in response to labyrinthine stimulation and voluntary eye movements, providing quantitative information about vestibular reflexes, central oculomotor function, and postural control strategies. 1, 2 These assessments are valuable for quantification, prognostication, and treatment planning when vestibular disorders are not evident from history and clinical examination alone. 1, 3

Critical Clinical Context: When NOT to Test

Vestibular function testing should NOT be routinely performed when patients meet clear clinical diagnostic criteria for conditions like BPPV, as testing adds little diagnostic accuracy, increases costs significantly, and does not alter management in the vast majority of cases. 1, 3

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery explicitly recommends against routine testing because it leads to unnecessary delays in diagnosis and treatment, increased costs, and patient discomfort including nausea and vomiting during testing. 3, 4


Indications for Vestibular Function Testing

When Testing IS Appropriate

Vestibular function testing is indicated when: 1, 3, 4

  • Diagnosis of vertigo/dizziness syndrome is unclear after history and physical examination 1, 3
  • Clinical presentation is atypical for common vestibular disorders 3, 4
  • Positional testing elicits equivocal or unusual nystagmus patterns 3, 4
  • Additional neurological symptoms suggest accompanying CNS or otologic disorders beyond typical vestibular presentations 1, 3, 4
  • Multiple concurrent peripheral vestibular disorders are suspected 1, 3
  • Patients remain symptomatic following treatment despite appropriate interventions 1, 3
  • Recurrent symptoms with failed response to initial therapy suggest unclear diagnosis or inadequate treatment 3
  • Atypical nystagmus, suspected additional vestibular pathology, or frequent recurrences warrant comprehensive evaluation 3

Red Flags Requiring Additional Evaluation

Consider vestibular testing when additional diagnoses are suspected based on: 1

  • Abnormal cranial nerve findings 1
  • Visual disturbances 1
  • Severe headache 1
  • Other neurological signs suggesting neurovascular compression of cranial nerve VIII, vestibular schwannoma, Arnold Chiari malformation, or cerebellar disorders 1

Individual Vestibular Function Tests

1. Electronystagmography (ENG) and Videonystagmography (VNG)

ENG and VNG are the foundational vestibular assessment tools that evaluate the vestibular-ocular reflex through comprehensive recording of eye movements in response to various stimuli. 3, 5, 6

Technical Distinction

  • ENG uses electrodes placed around the eyes to detect electrical potentials generated by eye movements 2
  • VNG uses infrared video cameras to directly track eye movements, providing superior accuracy and the ability to visualize nystagmus patterns in real-time 2, 5

Key Components of ENG/VNG Battery

Caloric Testing: 3, 2

  • Involves irrigation of the ear canals with warm and cool water or air to stimulate the horizontal semicircular canal
  • Records nystagmus response to assess peripheral vestibular function
  • Identifies unilateral vestibular weakness or bilateral vestibular loss
  • Provides quantitative measurement of vestibular asymmetry

Positional Testing: 3, 2

  • Records nystagmus during various head and body position changes
  • Differentiates peripheral from central causes of positional vertigo
  • Identifies specific canal involvement in BPPV when diagnosis is unclear

Voluntary Eye Movement Assessment: 3, 2

  • Evaluates saccades, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic nystagmus
  • Identifies central oculomotor dysfunction
  • Distinguishes peripheral vestibular from central nervous system pathology

Clinical Applications

ENG/VNG testing is valuable for: 3, 2

  • Quantifying vestibular dysfunction objectively
  • Providing information for treatment planning
  • Differentiating peripheral from central vestibular disorders
  • Assessing both peripheral vestibular and central oculomotor function

When NOT to Use ENG/VNG

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery explicitly recommends against routine ENG/VNG testing for: 3, 4

  • BPPV when diagnostic criteria are clearly met
  • Ménière's disease with typical history and symptoms
  • Any condition with clear clinical diagnosis

Critical Pitfalls and Caveats

Important limitations to recognize: 3, 4

  • Results often fluctuate throughout the course of vestibular disorders like Ménière's disease
  • The degree of damage detected correlates poorly with patient-perceived disability
  • Normal vestibular test results do NOT rule out vestibular disorders
  • Patient discomfort including nausea and vertigo during testing is common
  • Unnecessary testing leads to delays in diagnosis, treatment, and increased costs

2. Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT)

The vHIT is a modern, noninvasive method that assesses high-frequency vestibulo-ocular reflex function by measuring compensatory eye movements during rapid head rotations. 5

Technical Principles

  • Patient wears lightweight video goggles that track eye movements 5
  • Examiner performs rapid, unpredictable head impulses in the plane of each semicircular canal 5
  • System measures VOR gain (ratio of eye velocity to head velocity) and detects corrective saccades 5

Clinical Applications

vHIT enables assessment of all six semicircular canals individually: 5

  • Horizontal canals (lateral canals)
  • Anterior canals (superior canals)
  • Posterior canals

Specific diagnostic patterns: 5

  • Acute vestibular syndrome: Abnormal vHIT with low gain and large amplitude refixation saccades combined with asymmetric oVEMP separates vestibular neuritis from stroke
  • Vestibular neuritis: Typically shows abnormal vHIT in affected canal(s)
  • Chronic imbalance: Detects unilateral or bilateral vestibular loss as root cause
  • Bilateral vestibulopathy: Shows bilaterally reduced VOR gain

Advantages Over Traditional Testing

  • Quick to perform (5-10 minutes) 5
  • Well-tolerated by patients 5
  • Assesses higher frequency VOR function not captured by caloric testing 2, 5
  • Can be performed at bedside or in office 5

3. Rotary Chair Testing

Rotary chair testing evaluates vestibular function across a range of frequencies by rotating the patient in a motorized chair while recording eye movements. 2

Technical Principles

  • Patient sits in a computer-controlled rotating chair in darkness 2
  • Chair rotates at various frequencies and velocities 2
  • Eye movements are recorded to assess VOR function 2

Clinical Applications

Rotary chair provides information about: 2

  • Higher frequency VOR function compared to caloric testing
  • Bilateral vestibular function
  • Compensation status in unilateral vestibular loss
  • Central vestibular pathway integrity

Specific Uses

  • Monitoring vestibular compensation over time 2
  • Assessing bilateral vestibular hypofunction 2
  • Evaluating patients who cannot undergo caloric testing 2
  • Research applications for understanding vestibular physiology 2

4. Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMP)

VEMP testing evaluates otolith organ function (saccule and utricle) by measuring muscle responses to acoustic or vibration stimuli, providing information about structures not assessed by traditional vestibular tests. 7, 5, 6

Two Types of VEMP

Cervical VEMP (cVEMP): 7, 6

  • Records responses from the sternocleidomastoid muscle during tonic contraction
  • Elicited by loud clicks or tone bursts (typically 500 Hz)
  • Produces a biphasic response (p13-n23 waveform)
  • Assesses saccular function and inferior vestibular nerve 6

Ocular VEMP (oVEMP): 5, 6

  • Records responses from extraocular muscles (inferior oblique)
  • Elicited by similar acoustic stimuli or bone-conducted vibration
  • Produces a biphasic response (n10-p15 waveform)
  • Assesses utricular function and superior vestibular nerve 6

Anatomical and Physiological Basis

The VEMP represents a vestibulo-collic reflex: 7

  • Afferent limb arises from acoustically sensitive cells in the saccule (cVEMP) or utricle (oVEMP)
  • Signals conducted via inferior vestibular nerve (cVEMP) or superior vestibular nerve (oVEMP)
  • Efferent limb produces measurable muscle responses

Clinical Applications by Disorder

Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome: 6

  • Characteristically shows enhanced (increased amplitude, decreased threshold) cVEMP and oVEMP responses
  • High sensitivity and specificity for this diagnosis

Ménière's Disease: 7, 5, 6

  • Asymmetric cVEMP helps separate Ménière's disease from vestibular migraine in episodic spontaneous vertigo
  • May show absent or reduced amplitude responses on affected side
  • Useful for diagnosis and monitoring disease progression

Vestibular Neuritis: 7, 6

  • Superior vestibular neuritis: Abnormal oVEMP, normal cVEMP
  • Inferior vestibular neuritis: Abnormal cVEMP, normal oVEMP
  • Total vestibular neuritis: Both abnormal
  • Helps localize lesion and predict prognosis

Vestibular Schwannoma: 7, 6

  • May show absent or delayed VEMP responses
  • Useful for monitoring tumor effects on vestibular function
  • Complements audiometric and imaging findings

Multiple Sclerosis and Brainstem Lesions: 7, 6

  • Can show abnormal VEMP responses indicating central pathway involvement
  • Helps identify subclinical vestibular involvement

Bilateral Vestibulopathy: 6

  • Bilateral absent or reduced VEMP responses
  • Combined with vHIT and VNG findings confirms diagnosis

Technical Considerations and Pitfalls

Critical requirements for valid testing: 6

  • cVEMP requires adequate sternocleidomastoid muscle contraction (monitored by EMG)
  • Pre-existing conductive hearing loss invalidates results 6
  • Test is simple and reproducible when performed correctly 6
  • Good knowledge of electrophysiological principles essential for accurate interpretation 6

Common interpretation errors: 6

  • Inadequate muscle contraction producing false-negative results
  • Failure to account for conductive hearing loss
  • Misidentification of waveform peaks
  • Not normalizing cVEMP amplitude to background EMG activity

5. Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP)

CDP explores the interaction of vestibular, visual, and proprioceptive systems for postural control by systematically manipulating sensory inputs while measuring postural sway. 2

Technical Components

Sensory Organization Test (SOT): 2

  • Patient stands on force platform that measures center of pressure
  • Six conditions systematically alter visual and somatosensory inputs:
    1. Eyes open, fixed platform and surround
    2. Eyes closed, fixed platform
    3. Eyes open, sway-referenced surround
    4. Eyes open, sway-referenced platform
    5. Eyes closed, sway-referenced platform
    6. Eyes open, both sway-referenced

Motor Control Test: 2

  • Assesses automatic postural responses to platform translations
  • Identifies latency and strength of postural corrections

Clinical Applications

  • Identifies which sensory system(s) contribute to imbalance 2
  • Quantifies fall risk objectively 2
  • Guides vestibular rehabilitation strategies 2
  • Monitors treatment progress 2
  • Differentiates organic from non-organic balance disorders 2

6. Dynamic Visual Acuity Test (DVAT) and Gaze Stabilization Test (GST)

DVAT and GST provide functional assessment of VOR performance during head movement, measuring real-world gaze stability. 2

Dynamic Visual Acuity Test

  • Measures visual acuity during passive or active head rotation 2
  • Compares to static visual acuity 2
  • Decline of >2-3 lines indicates VOR dysfunction 2
  • Provides higher frequency VOR information than caloric testing 2

Gaze Stabilization Test

  • Assesses ability to maintain visual fixation during head movements 2
  • Functional measure of VOR performance 2
  • Useful for monitoring rehabilitation progress 2

7. Dynamic Subjective Visual Vertical (DSVV)

DSVV assesses utricular function by measuring perception of vertical orientation during dynamic conditions. 2

Clinical Applications

  • Evaluates otolith function complementary to VEMP 2
  • Identifies utricular dysfunction 2
  • Useful in central vestibular disorders 2

8. Home Video Nystagmography

Home video nystagmography allows patients to record nystagmus during spontaneous vertiginous episodes, capturing ictal findings that may not be present during office evaluation. 5

Clinical Applications

Episodic Spontaneous Vertigo: 5

  • High-velocity ictal nystagmus helps separate Ménière's disease from vestibular migraine
  • Documents nystagmus characteristics during actual attacks
  • Eliminates need for emergency department visits during episodes

Recurrent Positional Vertigo: 5

  • Can be diagnosed and treated at bedside guided by video nystagmography
  • Allows documentation of positional nystagmus patterns
  • Facilitates accurate diagnosis of canal involvement

Integrated Diagnostic Approach by Clinical Syndrome

Acute Vestibular Syndrome (Sudden-Onset Continuous Vertigo)

Diagnostic strategy: 5

  • vHIT: Abnormal with low gain and large refixation saccades suggests peripheral (vestibular neuritis)
  • oVEMP: Asymmetric response separates vestibular neuritis from stroke
  • Combination: Normal vHIT with acute vestibular syndrome suggests central cause (stroke) requiring urgent imaging

Episodic Spontaneous Vertigo (Recurrent Attacks Without Trigger)

Diagnostic strategy: 5

  • Home video nystagmography: High-velocity ictal nystagmus favors Ménière's disease
  • cVEMP: Asymmetric response helps separate Ménière's disease from vestibular migraine
  • Audiometry: Fluctuating low-frequency hearing loss supports Ménière's diagnosis

Chronic Imbalance (Persistent Unsteadiness)

Diagnostic strategy: 5

  • vHIT, cVEMP, and oVEMP: All three tests help detect unilateral or bilateral vestibular loss
  • CDP: Identifies sensory system contributions to imbalance
  • Comprehensive battery: Necessary to identify root cause and guide rehabilitation

Recurrent Positional Vertigo

Diagnostic strategy: 5

  • No laboratory testing required if typical BPPV presentation
  • Video nystagmography: Guides bedside diagnosis and treatment
  • VNG with positional testing: Only if atypical features or treatment failure

Evidence-Based Testing Algorithm

Step 1: Clinical Assessment

Determine if diagnosis is clear from history and physical examination alone 1, 3, 4

  • If YES and typical presentation: No vestibular testing needed; proceed to treatment
  • If NO or atypical features: Proceed to Step 2

Step 2: Identify Specific Clinical Scenario

Match patient presentation to syndrome: 5

  • Acute vestibular syndrome: vHIT + oVEMP
  • Episodic spontaneous vertigo: Home video + cVEMP + audiometry
  • Chronic imbalance: vHIT + cVEMP + oVEMP + CDP
  • Recurrent positional vertigo: Video nystagmography only if atypical

Step 3: Assess for Red Flags

If additional neurological symptoms present: 1, 4

  • Consider neuroimaging before or concurrent with vestibular testing
  • Expand vestibular battery to include central oculomotor assessment

Step 4: Interpret Results in Clinical Context

Remember critical limitations: 3, 4

  • Normal results do not rule out vestibular disorders
  • Results fluctuate over time in many conditions
  • Degree of abnormality correlates poorly with disability
  • Use results for diagnosis, not prognosis of functional impairment

Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Utility Considerations

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery emphasizes that unnecessary vestibular testing: 3, 4

  • Leads to delays in diagnosis and treatment
  • Increases direct and indirect costs to patients and providers
  • Causes patient discomfort (nausea, vomiting, vertigo during testing)
  • Rarely changes management when diagnosis is clinically clear

Testing should be reserved for situations where results will meaningfully impact: 1, 3, 4

  • Diagnostic accuracy when clinical diagnosis is uncertain
  • Treatment planning when multiple pathologies suspected
  • Monitoring when disease progression or compensation needs assessment
  • Medicolegal documentation when objective evidence required

Modern Vestibular Testing: Collective Assessment of All Five End-Organs

Contemporary vestibular assessment enables evaluation of all five vestibular end-organs: 5

  • Horizontal semicircular canals: vHIT, caloric testing
  • Anterior semicircular canals: vHIT
  • Posterior semicircular canals: vHIT
  • Saccule: cVEMP
  • Utricle: oVEMP

This comprehensive approach allows precise localization of vestibular pathology and guides targeted treatment strategies. 5, 6


Quality Assurance and Technical Standards

Essential elements for valid vestibular testing: 6

  • Trained personnel with expertise in test administration and interpretation
  • Properly calibrated equipment maintained according to manufacturer specifications
  • Standardized protocols following published guidelines
  • Recognition of technical artifacts and patient factors affecting results
  • Integration of test results with clinical findings rather than isolated interpretation

Common technical pitfalls to avoid: 6

  • Inadequate patient preparation or instruction
  • Failure to account for medications affecting vestibular function
  • Testing too soon after acute vestibular event (before compensation)
  • Over-reliance on single test abnormality without clinical correlation
  • Ignoring pre-existing conditions (hearing loss, cervical pathology) that invalidate specific tests

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Vestibular Assessment Using Electronystagmography (ENG) and Videonystagmography (VNG)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Appropriate Testing for Suspected Vestibular Neuritis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

European annals of otorhinolaryngology, head and neck diseases, 2021

Research

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: history and overview.

American journal of audiology, 2004

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.