How to Interpret an EKG: A Systematic Approach
Use a systematic, step-by-step method to interpret every EKG, beginning with rate and rhythm, then progressing through intervals, axis, and waveform morphology, always integrating clinical context with your findings. 1, 2
Step 1: Verify Technical Quality First
Before interpreting any EKG, check for technical problems that can lead to misdiagnosis:
- Confirm proper electrode placement, particularly precordial leads, as misplacement significantly alters findings and causes false diagnoses 1, 3
- Ensure adequate filtering settings (minimum 150 Hz high-frequency response for adults) to maintain diagnostic precision 1, 3
- Identify any artifacts from patient movement, electrical interference, or poor electrode contact 1
Step 2: Calculate Heart Rate
Use one of two methods:
- Count QRS complexes in a 6-second strip and multiply by 10 1, 2, 3
- Divide 300 by the number of large boxes between consecutive R waves 1, 2
- Normal: 60-100 bpm; bradycardia <60 bpm; tachycardia >100 bpm 1, 2, 3
Note that sinus bradycardia ≥30 bpm may be a normal variant in athletes 1
Step 3: Identify the Rhythm
- Confirm sinus rhythm by identifying a P wave before each QRS complex with consistent PR interval 1, 2
- Examine R-R intervals for regularity 2
- Note any irregularities: premature beats, pauses, or completely irregular patterns suggesting atrial fibrillation 1, 3
- Assess P wave morphology (normally upright in leads I, II, aVF; biphasic in V1) 2
Step 4: Measure Critical Intervals
PR Interval (normal: 120-200 ms or 3-5 small squares):
QRS Duration (normal: <120 ms or <3 small squares):
- Evaluates ventricular conduction 1, 2, 3
- Widening indicates bundle branch block or ventricular conduction delay 1, 3
QT Interval (corrected for heart rate):
- Calculate QTc using Bazett's formula 1, 2, 3
- Normal: <450 ms for men, <460 ms for women 1, 2
- Prolongation increases risk of arrhythmias 2
Step 5: Determine Electrical Axis
Use leads I and aVF for rapid quadrant determination: 2, 3
- Normal axis (-30° to +90°): Both leads I and aVF positive 1, 2, 3
- Left axis deviation (-30° to -90°): Lead I positive, aVF negative 1, 2, 3
- Right axis deviation (+90° to +180°): Lead I negative, aVF positive 1, 2, 3
- Extreme axis deviation (+180° to -90°): Both leads I and aVF negative 1
The axis provides essential information about chamber enlargement, myocardial hypertrophy, and conduction defects that directly impact morbidity and mortality 2
Step 6: Analyze Waveform Morphology
P Waves:
QRS Complexes:
- Look for pathological Q waves (>0.04 seconds or >25% of R wave amplitude) indicating myocardial infarction 2, 3
- Assess R wave progression across precordial leads (normally increases V1 to V4, then decreases toward V6) 2
- Check voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: S in V1 + R in V5 or V6 >3.5 mV 1
ST Segments:
- ST elevation >0.1 mV in limb leads or >0.15-0.2 mV in precordial leads indicates acute injury requiring emergent reperfusion 1, 3
- ST depression may indicate ischemia 2
- Measure at the J point 2
T Waves:
- Normally upright in leads I, II, V3-V6; inverted in aVR 2
- Inversion, hyperacute changes, or flattening suggest ischemia or other pathology 1, 3
- In children >1 month, T waves are often inverted in V1, V2, and V3 1
Step 7: Identify Location of Abnormalities
When ST changes or Q waves are present, determine the affected coronary territory to guide catheterization lab activation decisions 1, 3
Step 8: Integrate Clinical Context
Never interpret the EKG in isolation—this is a critical pitfall that leads to inappropriate management and adverse outcomes: 1, 3
- The same EKG finding has different implications depending on symptoms 1, 3
- Clinical signs and symptoms alone have insufficient sensitivity (35-38%) and specificity (28-91%) without EKG and biomarkers 3
- Always compare with previous EKGs when available, as missing dynamic changes is a common error 1, 3
Step 9: Verify Computer Interpretation
Computer interpretations are helpful adjuncts but never substitutes for physician interpretation: 1, 2, 3
- Computer programs accurately measure heart rate, intervals, and axes 3
- However, interpretations of rhythm disturbances, ischemia, or infarction require careful physician over-reading 3
- Errors in computer interpretation remain common 1, 3
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not over-rely on computer interpretation without physician verification 1, 3
- Do not fail to compare with previous EKGs when available 1, 3
- Do not interpret findings without clinical context 1, 3
- Recognize that the same EKG pattern may occur in different structural and pathophysiologic states, explaining frequent low specificity 1, 2
- Be aware that noncardiologists are more influenced by patient history than cardiologists when interpreting EKGs 1, 3
Maintaining Competency
- Formal EKG training significantly improves interpretation accuracy compared to self-study alone 4
- Continuing medical education through seminars or self-assessment programs is encouraged, especially for physicians who read EKGs infrequently 1, 3
- Residency training with Advanced Cardiac Life Support certification is sufficient for bedside interpretation in routine and emergency situations 3