What is the role of Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in the management of Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in HFrEF

GLP-1 receptor agonists should be used with caution in patients with established HFrEF and recent decompensation, as they provide no benefit for heart failure outcomes and show a trend toward worse outcomes including increased heart failure readmissions and serious cardiac events. 1

Evidence from HFrEF-Specific Trials

The evidence base for GLP-1 RAs in HFrEF comes from three dedicated trials, all showing disappointing results:

FIGHT Trial (Most Definitive Evidence)

  • Liraglutide showed no benefit in 300 patients with chronic HFrEF and recent hospitalization over 6 months 1
  • Numerically increased risk of HF readmission: 41% versus 34% (HR 1.30,95% CI 0.89-1.88) 1
  • Higher risk in diabetic subgroup: HR 1.54 (95% CI 0.97-2.46) for death and HF hospitalization 1
  • No improvement in clinical stability, functional capacity, or quality of life 1

LIVE Trial (Safety Concerns)

  • Serious adverse cardiac events occurred more frequently with liraglutide versus placebo: 10.0% versus 3.0% (P=0.04) 1
  • Events included sustained ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation requiring intervention, and aggravation of ischemic heart disease 1
  • No improvement in LVEF, quality of life, or functional class at 24 weeks in 241 stable HFrEF patients 1
  • Associated with increased heart rate and more serious cardiac events 1

Albiglutide Study

  • No significant effect on LVEF, brain natriuretic peptide, 6-minute walk test, or quality of life in 82 patients with HFrEF over 12 weeks 1

Mechanistic Concerns in HFrEF

GLP-1 RAs cause physiologic changes that may be detrimental in HFrEF:

  • Heart rate increase of 3-10 beats/min due to direct sinus node effects, which can worsen outcomes in decompensated HF 1, 2
  • Systolic blood pressure reduction of 2-3 mm Hg 1
  • These hemodynamic effects may explain the variable and concerning results in HF populations 1

Clinical Algorithm for GLP-1 RA Use Based on HF Status

Patients WITHOUT Established HF (Safe to Use)

  • GLP-1 RAs are safe and beneficial for reducing major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in diabetic patients at cardiovascular risk 1
  • No impact on preventing HF hospitalization in large cardiovascular outcomes trials, but no harm signal 1
  • Should be considered for ASCVD risk reduction in this population 1

Patients WITH Stable HFrEF (Use with Caution)

  • Avoid in patients with recent decompensation given trend toward worse outcomes in FIGHT trial 1
  • If diabetes management requires GLP-1 RA in stable HFrEF, monitor closely for:
    • Heart rate increases 1, 2
    • Signs of HF decompensation 1
    • Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia) 1, 3

Patients WITH Recent HF Hospitalization (Avoid)

  • Do not initiate GLP-1 RAs based on FIGHT trial showing no benefit and trend toward increased readmissions 1
  • Consider alternative glucose-lowering agents, particularly SGLT2 inhibitors which have proven benefit in HFrEF 1

Guideline Recommendations

The American Heart Association and Heart Failure Society of America state explicitly: In patients with established HFrEF and recent decompensation, GLP-1 receptor agonists should be used with caution, given no evidence of benefit and a trend toward worse outcomes in 2 small RCTs 1

If HF or chronic kidney disease predominates, SGLT2 inhibitors are preferred over GLP-1 RAs according to consensus statements from the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and American Diabetes Association 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume cardiovascular benefits in general diabetic populations translate to HFrEF patients - the evidence shows potential harm in this specific subgroup 1
  • Do not overlook the heart rate increase - this seemingly modest effect (3-10 bpm) can be clinically significant in decompensated HF 1, 2
  • Do not use GLP-1 RAs as HF therapy - they provide no benefit for HF-specific outcomes (LVEF, functional capacity, HF hospitalizations) 1

Alternative Considerations

When diabetes management is needed in HFrEF patients, SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrate clear mortality and HF hospitalization benefits and should be prioritized over GLP-1 RAs 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Autoimmune Hepatitis with Type 2 Diabetes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Across the Spectrum of Heart Failure.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.