What GLP-2 (Glucagon-like peptide-2) analogs are recommended in the treatment of heart failure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

GLP-2 Analogs in Heart Failure

No GLP-2 analogs are currently recommended for the treatment of heart failure, and they should be distinguished from GLP-1 receptor agonists, which have established cardiovascular benefits but varying effects in heart failure.

Clarification on GLP-2 vs. GLP-1

It's important to clarify that GLP-2 (Glucagon-like peptide-2) and GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide-1) are distinct hormones with different physiological roles:

  • GLP-2 analogs (like teduglutide) are primarily used for intestinal disorders such as short bowel syndrome
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists are used for diabetes management and have been extensively studied for cardiovascular outcomes

Current Evidence on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure

The guidelines provide recommendations specifically for GLP-1 receptor agonists (not GLP-2) in heart failure:

Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)

  • GLP-1 receptor agonists should be used with caution in patients with HFrEF 1
  • Avoid GLP-1 receptor agonists if there has been recent heart failure decompensation 1
  • Some studies have raised concerns about potential harm in patients with established HFrEF 1

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)

  • GLP-1 receptor agonists may be considered in patients with HFpEF, particularly those with obesity or diabetes 2
  • Recent meta-analysis suggests GLP-1 receptor agonists may reduce worsening HF events in HFpEF 2

Recommendations Based on Current Guidelines

  1. For patients with established heart failure:

    • SGLT2 inhibitors are the preferred agents for reducing heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular death in both HFrEF and HFpEF 1
    • GLP-1 receptor agonists should be used with caution, particularly in HFrEF 1
  2. For patients with diabetes at risk for heart failure:

    • SGLT2 inhibitors are preferred for heart failure risk reduction 1
    • GLP-1 receptor agonists may be considered for their benefits on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but not specifically for heart failure prevention 1

Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm

  1. Assess heart failure status:

    • If patient has HFrEF: Prioritize SGLT2 inhibitors; avoid or use GLP-1 RAs with caution
    • If patient has HFpEF: Consider SGLT2 inhibitors first; GLP-1 RAs may be considered as additional therapy
  2. Consider comorbidities:

    • If patient has diabetes with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Both SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs provide benefits
    • If patient has diabetes with predominant heart failure risk: Prioritize SGLT2 inhibitors over GLP-1 RAs

Important Caveats

  • There is a lack of specific data on GLP-2 analogs in heart failure management
  • The cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists appear to be class-specific and may vary between agents
  • Human GLP-1 RAs may have different effects than non-human GLP-1 RAs in heart failure patients 3
  • Ongoing trials are needed to better define the role of GLP-1 receptor agonists across the spectrum of heart failure

In summary, while GLP-1 receptor agonists have established cardiovascular benefits, there are no specific recommendations for GLP-2 analogs in heart failure management, and treatment decisions should prioritize SGLT2 inhibitors for heart failure risk reduction.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.