What is the best course of treatment for a 41-year-old female patient with low back pain, Type I Modic endplate changes at L5/S1, and ongoing neck and left arm pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Recommendations for 41-Year-Old Female with Low Back Pain, Type I Modic Changes at L5/S1, and Neck/Arm Pain

Primary Recommendation for Low Back Pain with Type I Modic Changes

The patient should proceed with the Intracept procedure (basivertebral nerve ablation) for her L5/S1 vertebrogenic pain, as this represents the most appropriate evidence-based intervention for Type I Modic changes causing chronic low back pain. 1

Rationale for Intracept Procedure

  • Radiofrequency ablation of the basivertebral nerve has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to standard care in patients with chronic low back pain and Type I or Type II Modic changes, with a mean ODI improvement of -25.3 points versus -4.4 points in controls at 3 months (p<0.001) 1

  • 74.5% of patients achieved ≥10-point improvement in ODI following basivertebral nerve ablation, compared to only 32.7% with standard care 1

  • The patient meets all inclusion criteria for this procedure: chronic low back pain >6 months duration, Type I Modic changes at L5/S1 on MRI, and failed conservative management including physical therapy, medications, and injections 1

  • Type I Modic changes represent vertebral endplate inflammation/edema that is specifically associated with chronic low back pain, making this a targeted treatment for the underlying pathophysiology 2, 3

Conservative Management Already Completed

The patient has appropriately completed conservative treatment prior to considering interventional procedures:

  • Formal physical therapy program completed 4
  • Medication trials including topiramate 25mg BID and meloxicam 7.5mg BID 5
  • Previous injection therapy attempted 5
  • Duration of symptoms sufficient (>6 months) to justify procedural intervention 1

Alternative Considerations for L5/S1 Pathology

Epidural steroid injections are NOT recommended as primary treatment for this patient's axial low back pain, as the evidence shows only short-term relief (<2 weeks) for chronic low back pain without radiculopathy 5

  • The patient's L5/S1 disc extrusion with right S1 nerve root abutment could potentially benefit from targeted right L5/S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection IF she develops radicular symptoms into the right leg 5

  • Currently, the patient denies radiating pain into buttocks or legs, making epidural injections inappropriate at this time 4

Intradiscal corticosteroid injection represents an alternative approach that has shown promise in accelerating the conversion of Modic I to Modic 0 changes with associated pain relief 2

  • However, this approach has less robust evidence than basivertebral nerve ablation and is not the standard of care 2, 1

Lumbar Fusion Considerations

Lumbar fusion should be reserved as a salvage option if the Intracept procedure fails to provide adequate relief 4

  • The presence of Type I Modic changes alone is NOT an absolute indication for fusion, particularly in the absence of documented instability or spondylolisthesis 5, 4

  • The patient's L5/S1 disc extrusion and advanced spondylosis do not constitute instability requiring immediate fusion 4

  • If fusion becomes necessary, the patient would need to demonstrate failure of less invasive interventions first, consistent with evidence-based guidelines 5, 4

Management of Cervical and Mid-Thoracic Pain

Occipital Neuralgia Treatment Success

The patient has achieved 50% relief from left greater and lesser occipital nerve blocks, indicating successful treatment of her occipital neuralgia component [@case summary@]

  • This represents appropriate management of her sharp shooting scalp pain, which has resolved since the injections [@case summary@]

  • No further intervention is needed for the occipital neuralgia at this time given the positive response [@case summary@]

Ongoing Left Arm Pain Evaluation

The patient's persistent left arm pain requires rheumatologic evaluation and upper extremity electrodiagnostic studies, as her cervical MRI shows no neural foraminal stenosis or central canal stenosis 5

  • Normal cervical MRI effectively excludes cervical radiculopathy as the cause of arm pain 5

  • The planned rheumatology laboratory evaluation and bilateral upper extremity EMG/NCS are appropriate to identify alternative etiologies such as peripheral neuropathy, brachial plexopathy, or inflammatory conditions [@case summary@]

  • Diffusion-weighted imaging could help distinguish Modic type 1 changes from infection if there is clinical concern, though this is not indicated based on the current presentation 5

Mid-Thoracic Pain Management

The patient's mid-thoracic pain at the T4 level with normal thoracic MRI should be managed conservatively with continued physical therapy and medications [@case summary@]

  • The thoracic MRI showing no herniation, cord impingement, or stenosis excludes structural pathology requiring intervention [@case summary@]

  • Formal physical therapy for thoracic and lumbar pain areas is appropriate, as recommended by the treating physician 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not proceed with lumbar fusion as first-line treatment for this patient's L5/S1 pathology, as less invasive options (Intracept) have superior evidence for Type I Modic changes 1

Do not attribute the left arm pain to cervical spine pathology given the normal cervical MRI—pursue alternative diagnoses 5

Do not perform epidural steroid injections for axial low back pain without radicular symptoms, as evidence shows minimal benefit 5

Ensure the patient has a driver and fasts for 12 hours prior to the Intracept procedure due to sedation requirements [@case summary@]

Counsel the patient to expect 2-4 weeks of post-procedural soreness following basivertebral nerve ablation, which is normal [@case summary@]

Address smoking cessation if applicable, as smoking negatively impacts all spinal interventions and surgical outcomes 6

Related Questions

Is thermal destruction of the intraosseous basivertebral nerve (TRML DSTRJ IOS BVN) medically necessary for a patient with vertebrogenic low back pain?
Is the Intracept procedure medically necessary for a patient with chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease with Modic changes on MRI?
Is L4 and L5 basivertebral nerve ablation with the Intracept procedure medically necessary for a patient with severe and debilitating vertebrogenic low back pain, despite insufficient evidence per Clinical Practice Benchmark (CPB)?
Is the Intracept Procedure (intraosseous ablation of the basivertebral nerve (BVN)) medically necessary for a patient with a diagnosis of vertebrogenic low back pain (M54.51)?
Is lumbar ablation (Lumbar Radiofrequency Ablation) an effective first-line treatment for acute low back pain?
What is the significance of an abnormal Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) to creatinine ratio in assessing kidney function?
What is the appropriate treatment for a patient with iron deficiency anemia?
What is the initiation protocol for long-acting injectable Invega (paliperidone palmitate)?
Can well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) on the leg be treated with curettage and cautery?
What is the management plan for a gravida 3, para 2 (G3P2) woman at 35 weeks gestation presenting with vaginal spotting, a category 1 Cardiotocography (CTG) and no active bleeding on pelvic (PV) examination?
What are the pre and postoperative considerations for non-cardiac surgery in patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.