What is the average life span of a peripheral stent?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Lifespan of Peripheral Stents

Peripheral arterial stents demonstrate moderate long-term durability, with primary patency rates of approximately 66% at 5 years and 46% at 10 years for iliac artery stents, though patency varies significantly by anatomic location and lesion characteristics. 1

Iliac Artery Stent Longevity

The most robust long-term data comes from iliac arterial stenting:

  • Primary patency rates: 66% at 5 years and 46% at 10 years 1
  • Secondary patency rates (after reintervention): 79% at 5 years and 55% at 10 years 1
  • Approximately 16% of patients required surgical bypass involving the stented segment within 10 years, primarily due to stent restenosis 1

Femoral-Popliteal Stent Durability

Femoral-popliteal stents have historically shown inferior longevity compared to iliac stents:

  • No advantage over angioplasty alone in randomized trials for patency, ankle-brachial index, or clinical improvement 2
  • Stenting may be reserved for salvage of immediate angioplasty failure or treatment of recurrent stenosis after angioplasty 2
  • Long-segment superficial femoral artery disease with poor runoff demonstrates particularly poor outcomes with endovascular therapy 2

Factors Affecting Stent Longevity

Anatomic Considerations

  • Iliac location: Superior patency compared to femoral-popliteal segments 2
  • Lesion length: Longer lesions associated with worse outcomes 2
  • Runoff quality: Poor tibial runoff significantly decreases intervention durability 2

Patient-Specific Factors

  • Female gender and hormone replacement therapy: Reported to decrease iliac stent patency 3, 4
  • Severity of disease: Critical limb ischemia versus claudication affects outcomes 2
  • Lesion type: Stenoses perform better than occlusions in femoral-popliteal territory 2

Plastic vs. Metal Stents (Non-Arterial Applications)

For biliary applications, which provide insight into stent behavior:

  • Plastic stents: Average patency approximately 4 months 2
  • Self-expanding metal stents: Average patency approximately 8 months (twice that of plastic stents) 2
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis favors metal stents for patients with estimated survival exceeding 6 months 2

Surveillance and Reintervention Requirements

Regular follow-up is mandatory to maintain long-term patency:

  • Approximately 62% of patients with venous stents required reintervention for recurrent symptoms in one multi-institutional series 5
  • Only 32% of interventions resulted in sustained symptomatic improvement without additional procedures 5
  • Annual duplex ultrasound monitoring recommended to detect restenosis before symptom recurrence 6

Clinical Implications

The decision to use peripheral stents must account for expected patient survival and ability to comply with surveillance:

  • Patients with reasonable life expectancy unable to return for subsequent procedures should be considered for alternative therapy 5
  • For iliac lesions, provisional stenting (stenting only for angioplasty failure) is more cost-effective than primary stenting, though primary stenting is now routine clinical practice 2
  • Endovascular brachytherapy may reduce restenosis rates in femoral-popliteal arteries, though this remains investigational 2

Common Pitfalls

  • Overestimating durability: Primary patency drops substantially after the first year, particularly in femoral-popliteal segments 1
  • Inadequate surveillance: Late stent failure can occur progressively beyond 4 years, requiring ongoing monitoring 7
  • Poor patient selection: Patients with extensive disease, poor runoff, or limited life expectancy may not benefit from stenting 2, 5
  • Ignoring anatomic location: Iliac stents perform substantially better than femoral-popliteal stents 2, 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Interventional Radiology Treatment of Iliac Artery Dissection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Clinical Guidelines for Mesenteric Revascularization

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.