What are the options for a non-invasive liver (liver) screening test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

A non-invasive liver screen should start with the FIB-4 score, a simple and non-proprietary fibrosis score, to assess for clinically significant liver fibrosis, as recommended by the most recent and highest quality study 1. The FIB-4 score has been shown to have the best diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis compared to other non-invasive markers of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) 1.

  • The FIB-4 score is calculated using a combination of age, platelet count, and liver enzymes (AST and ALT) 1.
  • A FIB-4 score <1.3 (<2.0 in those older than 65 years) can reliably exclude advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, with a negative predictive value of ≥90% 1.
  • Patients with a FIB-4 score >2.67 are at high risk for advanced fibrosis and should be referred to hepatology for further evaluation, including liver stiffness measurement (LSM) or liver biopsy 1.
  • For patients with an indeterminate FIB-4 score (1.3-2.67), additional testing, such as LSM, may be necessary to determine the stage of liver fibrosis 1.
  • The use of non-invasive fibrosis tests, such as FIB-4, is supported by recent guidelines, including the EASL clinical practice guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis - 2021 update 1, and the EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): executive summary 1.
  • These guidelines recommend a multi-step approach, starting with a non-patented blood-based score, such as FIB-4, followed by imaging techniques, such as liver elastography, to further clarify the fibrosis stage if fibrosis is still suspected or in high-risk groups 1.

From the Research

Non-Invasive Liver Screen

  • The most common causes of mildly elevated transaminase levels are nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease 2, 3.
  • Uncommon causes of elevated transaminase levels include drug-induced liver injury, hepatitis B and C, and hereditary hemochromatosis 2, 3.
  • Rare causes of elevated transaminase levels include alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency, autoimmune hepatitis, and Wilson disease 2, 3.
  • Extrahepatic sources, such as thyroid disorders, celiac sprue, hemolysis, and muscle disorders, are also associated with mildly elevated transaminase levels 2, 4.

Diagnostic Approaches

  • The initial evaluation of mildly elevated transaminase levels should include an assessment for metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, a complete blood count with platelets, measurement of serum albumin, iron, total iron-binding capacity, and ferritin, and hepatitis C antibody and hepatitis B surface antigen testing 2, 3.
  • The nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score and the alcoholic liver disease/NAFLD index can be helpful in the evaluation of mildly elevated transaminase levels 2.
  • The combination of a blood test and Fibroscan improves the non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis 5.
  • FIB-4, APRI, and AST/ALT ratio can be used to assess liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, with APRI being the most appropriate substitute for FibroScan 6.

Screening Tools

  • Fibroscan is a useful tool for assessing liver fibrosis, but it may not be available in all settings 5, 6.
  • Blood tests, such as FIB-4, APRI, and AST/ALT ratio, can be used to assess liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD 6.
  • The FIB-4 Index Score or NAFLD Fibrosis Score can be used to predict which patients are at risk for fibrosis and may benefit from further testing or referral to a hepatologist 3.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.