What is the success rate of Durvalumab (Imfinzi) in cancer treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Durvalumab Success Rates in Cancer Treatment

Durvalumab demonstrates a 5-year overall survival rate of 42.9% in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after chemoradiation, and achieves objective response rates of 17.8% in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with success rates varying significantly by cancer type and treatment setting. 1

Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (Consolidation After Chemoradiation)

Survival Outcomes

  • Median overall survival (OS) reaches 47.5 months with durvalumab versus 29.1 months with placebo (HR 0.72), representing an 18-month survival advantage in the PACIFIC trial. 1
  • The 5-year OS rate is 42.9% with durvalumab compared to 33.4% with placebo, demonstrating durable long-term benefit. 1
  • The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate is 33.1% versus 19.0% with placebo, indicating sustained disease control in one-third of patients. 1

Response and Disease Control

  • Median PFS is 16.8 months with durvalumab versus 5.6 months with placebo (HR 0.52), representing a clinically meaningful 11-month improvement. 1
  • The objective response rate is 28.4% with durvalumab versus 16.0% with placebo, with 72.8% of responders maintaining response at 18 months. 2
  • Median time to death or distant metastasis is 23.2 months versus 14.6 months with placebo. 2

Important Caveats for NSCLC

  • Post hoc analysis suggests lack of benefit in PD-L1-negative tumors (HR 1.05) and EGFR-mutated patients (HR 0.97), though these analyses were performed in small subgroups and require further validation. 1
  • Grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis occurs in only 4.4% of patients, representing the main higher-grade toxicity. 1

Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (Consolidation After Chemoradiation)

Survival Outcomes from ADRIATIC Trial

  • Median OS is 55.9 months with durvalumab versus 33.4 months with placebo (HR 0.73), representing a 22.5-month survival advantage. 1
  • The 24-month OS rate is 68% versus 58.5% with placebo, and the 36-month OS rate is 56.5% versus 47.6%. 1
  • The 2-year OS rate improves by approximately 10% with addition of consolidation durvalumab compared to chemoradiotherapy alone. 1

Disease Control

  • Median PFS is 16.6 months with durvalumab versus 9.2 months with placebo (HR 0.76). 1
  • The 24-month PFS rate is 46.2% versus 34.2% with placebo. 1

Safety Profile in SCLC

  • Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events occur in 8.8% with durvalumab versus 6% with placebo. 1
  • Drug discontinuation due to adverse events occurs in 16.4% versus 10.6% with placebo. 1

Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (Second-Line Setting)

Response Rates

  • The objective response rate is 17.8% (95% CI 12.7%-24.0%), including 7 complete responses among 191 patients. 3
  • Response rates are dramatically higher in PD-L1 high expressors at 27.6% versus only 5.1% in PD-L1 low/negative patients, representing a critical predictive biomarker. 3

Survival Outcomes

  • Median OS is 18.2 months with a 1-year OS rate of 55%. 3
  • Median PFS is 1.5 months, reflecting the advanced, heavily pretreated nature of this population. 3
  • Responses are early (median time to response 1.41 months) and durable (median duration of response not reached). 3

Safety in Urothelial Carcinoma

  • Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occur in only 6.8% of patients. 3
  • Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurs in 1.6% of patients. 3

Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (First-Line Setting)

MYSTIC Trial Results

  • In the first-line metastatic setting, durvalumab monotherapy failed to meet its primary endpoint, with median OS of 16.3 months versus 12.9 months with chemotherapy in PD-L1 ≥25% patients (HR 0.76, P=0.04, nonsignificant). 4
  • Durvalumab plus tremelimumab showed median OS of 11.9 months versus 12.9 months with chemotherapy (HR 0.85, P=0.20). 4
  • In patients with blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) ≥20 mutations per megabase, durvalumab plus tremelimumab showed improved median OS of 21.9 months versus 10.0 months with chemotherapy (HR 0.49). 4

Chemotherapy-Ineligible Stage III NSCLC (After Radiotherapy Alone)

DUART Trial Results

  • In patients receiving radiotherapy alone (without chemotherapy), median PFS is 9.2 months with 12-month landmark rate of 39.6%. 5
  • Median OS is 21.1 months with 12-month landmark rate of 64.7%, demonstrating benefit even in this frailer, older population. 5
  • Grade 3/4 possibly related adverse events occur in 9.8% within 6 months of durvalumab initiation. 5

Common Pitfalls and Clinical Considerations

Patient Selection

  • Durvalumab should be initiated within 42 days of completing thoracic radiation in stage III NSCLC to maximize benefit. 1
  • Patients must have no disease progression after definitive chemoradiotherapy and good performance status (ECOG 0-1). 1
  • Consider avoiding durvalumab in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients based on post hoc analysis, though definitive evidence is lacking. 1

Duration and Monitoring

  • Standard treatment duration is up to 12 months in both NSCLC and SCLC settings. 1
  • Monitor closely for pneumonitis, which represents the most significant immune-related adverse event. 1

Context-Specific Success Rates

  • Success rates are highest in the consolidation setting after chemoradiation (stage III NSCLC and limited-stage SCLC). 1
  • Monotherapy in first-line metastatic NSCLC shows inferior results compared to chemotherapy or combination approaches. 4
  • PD-L1 expression significantly predicts response in urothelial carcinoma but not in NSCLC consolidation setting. 3, 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.