What are the implications of a cross-sectional study on the effect of estradiol on penile erection in patients with erectile dysfunction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Critique of Cross-Sectional Study on Estradiol and Penile Erection

Study Design Limitations

The cross-sectional design of this study fundamentally limits causal inference, as it cannot establish whether elevated estradiol causes erectile dysfunction or whether erectile dysfunction leads to hormonal changes. 1

Critical Methodological Weaknesses

  • Temporal ambiguity: Cross-sectional studies capture a single time point, making it impossible to determine whether elevated estradiol preceded the development of erectile dysfunction or resulted from compensatory mechanisms in men already experiencing ED 1

  • Selection bias: The study enrolled only 135 patients with established erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5 ≤21), lacking a robust control group of men without ED for comparison, which limits generalizability 1

  • Confounding variables: While the study measured multiple hormones and metabolic parameters, cross-sectional analysis cannot adequately control for unmeasured confounders that may influence both estradiol levels and erectile function simultaneously 1

  • Lack of intervention: Without manipulating estradiol levels experimentally, the study cannot demonstrate that reducing estradiol would improve erectile function, which is the clinically relevant question 1

Contradictory Evidence in the Literature

The relationship between estradiol and erectile dysfunction remains controversial, with conflicting findings across multiple studies.

  • One retrospective study of 183 ED patients found that the estradiol-to-testosterone ratio negatively affected penile base erection (HR: -4.34,95% CI: -6.52 to -2.16), supporting the cross-sectional study's findings 2

  • Another study of 195 eugonadal young men identified elevated estradiol as an independent risk factor for organic ED (OR: 1.094,95% CI: 1.042-1.149), with higher estradiol levels in men with venous ED 3

  • However, a Spanish study of 230 patients found no association between testosterone/estradiol ratio and either erectile dysfunction or sexual desire, with age being the only independent variable for both outcomes 4

  • A Chinese study of 878 men showed elevated estradiol in ED patients (116.88 ± 40.81 pmol/L vs. 94.12 ± 32.32 pmol/L in controls) but could not establish causation 5

Guideline Context and Clinical Relevance

Current clinical practice guidelines do not support routine estradiol testing or estradiol-targeted treatment for erectile dysfunction.

  • The American College of Physicians states there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against routine hormonal blood tests or hormonal treatment in ED management 6

  • The 2025 European Association of Urology guidelines recommend testosterone therapy only for ED patients with documented low testosterone levels experiencing reduced sexual desire, with no mention of estradiol manipulation 6

  • The American Urological Association identifies the need for outcomes of PDE5 inhibitors to be stratified based on serum testosterone levels but does not address estradiol 6

Specific Analytical Concerns

The study's statistical approach and outcome measures raise additional questions about validity.

  • The negative correlation between base erection time and estradiol (HR: -0.11,95% CI: -0.80 to 1.72) has a confidence interval crossing zero, suggesting statistical instability 1

  • Stratification by "normal Rigiscan results" creates a selected subgroup analysis that may not reflect the broader ED population 1

  • The 10-minute threshold for "effective erection time" appears arbitrary without physiological justification or validation against patient-reported outcomes 1

  • Nocturnal penile tumescence testing, while objective, may not correlate with functional erectile capacity during sexual activity, limiting clinical applicability 7

Missing Critical Elements

The study fails to address several factors essential for understanding estradiol's role in erectile dysfunction.

  • Aromatase activity: No assessment of peripheral aromatization rates, which could explain elevated estradiol in obese or metabolically compromised patients 1

  • Vascular assessment: Limited evaluation of penile arterial inflow or venous occlusive dysfunction, which are primary mechanisms in organic ED 6, 7

  • Medication effects: No documentation of drugs that might alter estradiol levels (e.g., aromatase inhibitors, certain antihypertensives) 6

  • Body composition: Adipose tissue produces aromatase; without body mass index or waist circumference data, the estradiol-obesity-ED relationship remains unexplored 1

Clinical Practice Implications

Despite the study's findings, current evidence does not support measuring or treating estradiol levels in men with erectile dysfunction.

  • First-line treatment remains PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil) regardless of estradiol levels, with strong evidence for efficacy and safety 6

  • Testosterone therapy should be considered only in hypogonadal men (low morning total testosterone) with ED and reduced libido, not based on estradiol levels 6

  • The 2009 American College of Physicians guideline explicitly states insufficient evidence for hormonal testing beyond testosterone in ED evaluation 6

  • No randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that lowering estradiol improves erectile function or quality of life in men with ED 6

Research Quality Hierarchy

This cross-sectional study ranks low in the evidence hierarchy for establishing treatment recommendations.

  • Randomized controlled trials of PDE5 inhibitors provide high-quality evidence for ED treatment, showing consistent benefit across multiple studies 6

  • The cross-sectional design cannot compete with intervention studies for guiding clinical decisions about hormone manipulation 1

  • Observational studies suggesting estradiol associations require validation through prospective interventional trials before changing practice 2, 5, 3

Recommendations for Future Research

To establish whether estradiol truly affects erectile function, specific study designs are needed.

  • Prospective cohort studies following men with varying estradiol levels over time to assess ED development 6

  • Randomized trials of aromatase inhibitors in men with elevated estradiol and ED to determine if lowering estradiol improves erectile function 6

  • Mechanistic studies using penile duplex ultrasonography to correlate estradiol levels with arterial and venous function 7

  • Stratified analyses of PDE5 inhibitor response by baseline estradiol levels to determine if estradiol predicts treatment failure 6

References

Research

Effect of estradiol on penile erection: a cross-sectional study.

Translational andrology and urology, 2019

Research

Testosterone/estradiol ratio, is it useful in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction and low sexual desire?

The aging male : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male, 2016

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pharmacological Penile Doppler Ultrasound Procedure for Erectile Dysfunction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.