What are the recommended first-line and second-line treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

First-Line and Second-Line Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis

Direct Answer

For relapsing-remitting MS, high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) including ocrelizumab, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ofatumumab should be initiated early in the disease course rather than starting with traditional first-line agents like interferons or glatiramer acetate. 1, 2 Current evidence strongly favors early escalation or induction strategies over the outdated stepwise approach. 1, 2

First-Line Treatment Strategy

High-Efficacy DMTs as Preferred Initial Therapy

  • High-efficacy DMTs (monoclonal antibodies including alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab) are most effective when initiated early in the disease course. 2

  • Patients with markers of aggressive disease—including frequent relapses, incomplete recovery from relapses, high frequency of new MRI lesions, and rapid onset of disability—should receive high-efficacy DMTs from the outset. 2, 3

  • The traditional stepwise approach has been replaced by early escalation and induction strategies based on current evidence from the European Academy of Neurology-ECTRIMS guidelines. 2

Traditional First-Line Agents (Now Secondary Options)

  • Interferon-beta (subcutaneous IFNβ-1b or IFNβ-1a given multiple times weekly) and glatiramer acetate remain valid options primarily due to their long-term safety profile and cost-effectiveness, though they are only modestly efficient in reducing annualized relapse rates. 4, 5

  • These agents reduce relapse rates by 29-68% compared to placebo but are less effective than high-efficacy DMTs. 6

  • Weekly intramuscular IFNβ-1a is inferior to subcutaneous formulations given multiple times per week and to glatiramer acetate. 7

Second-Line Treatment Strategy

When to Escalate Therapy

  • Treatment failure is defined as ≥1 clinical relapse occurring ≥3 months after DMT initiation, new MRI activity, or incomplete recovery from relapses. 1

  • When breakthrough disease activity occurs on first-line therapy, escalate to natalizumab if JC virus antibody-negative, or consider alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, or fingolimod. 3

Switching Between First-Line Agents

  • For patients failing initial interferon therapy, switching from one interferon to another interferon formulation can be effective, with 67% of patients remaining relapse-free at 24 months on the second interferon compared to 41% on the initial interferon. 8

  • Switching from glatiramer acetate to interferon-beta shows superior outcomes, with 87% relapse-free at 24 months on interferon versus 12% on glatiramer acetate. 8

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (AHSCT)

  • For aggressive relapsing-remitting MS refractory to high-efficacy DMTs, AHSCT using intermediate-intensity conditioning achieves superior disease control compared to continued DMT escalation. 9, 3

  • Optimal eligibility criteria for AHSCT include: age <45 years, disease duration <10 years, EDSS score <4.0 (or 0.0-6.0 per some guidelines), and high focal inflammation. 1, 3

  • In contemporary studies of relapsing-remitting MS patients treated with AHSCT, progression-free survival rates reach 80-100% with NEDA (no evidence of disease activity) rates of 70-80%. 9

  • Long-term outcomes show 87% progression-free survival at 10 years in relapsing-remitting MS patients, with no transplant-related mortality in recent Swedish case series. 9

  • AHSCT as first-line therapy should only be considered for patients with rapidly evolving, severe MS with poor prognosis, ideally within a clinical trial. 1

Treatment for Progressive Forms

Primary Progressive MS

  • Ocrelizumab is the specific indicated treatment for primary progressive MS, though its efficacy is primarily limited to slowing disability progression. 1, 2

Secondary Progressive MS

  • AHSCT may be considered for young patients (<45 years) with early secondary progressive MS of short duration and well-documented clinical and radiological evidence of active inflammatory disease. 1

  • AHSCT is not indicated for advanced progressive MS forms. 2

Monitoring Requirements

  • Brain MRI follow-up should be performed at least annually for stable patients, but patients at risk of serious treatment-related adverse events require monitoring every 3-4 months. 1, 2

  • MRI sequences must include T2/FLAIR and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images to detect new or expanding lesions. 1, 2

  • For natalizumab-treated patients at high risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, brain MRI every 3-4 months is recommended. 2

Critical Age and Disease Duration Considerations

  • Patients >55 years with stable disease should consider treatment discontinuation, as benefits of continuing immunosuppressive therapy may be outweighed by increased infection risk and other adverse effects. 1, 2

  • Young patients (<45 years) with disease duration <10 years or history of highly active disease before stabilization should continue current therapy even if stable. 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not unnecessarily prolong DMT withdrawal before AHSCT, as this increases relapse risk. 3

  • Do not underestimate carryover effects of alemtuzumab before AHSCT. 3

  • Do not mistake pseudoatrophy (excessive brain volume decrease within the first 6-12 months of treatment due to resolution of inflammation) for disease progression. 1

  • Rehabilitation should begin immediately post-AHSCT to exploit the brain's reorganizational capacity during complete inflammatory suppression, with a phased approach including pre-habilitation, early mobilization, intensive outpatient rehabilitation, and maintenance rehabilitation. 1, 3

References

Guideline

Traitement de la Sclérose en Plaques Récurrente-Rémittente

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Tratamiento Inicial para Pacientes con Esclerosis Múltiple

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Recent developments in interferon-based therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2018

Research

Comparing the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2017

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.